George Washington Papers
Documents filtered by: Recipient="Johnson, Thomas" AND Period="Washington Presidency"
sorted by: date (descending)
Permanent link for this document:
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Washington/05-18-02-0222

From George Washington to Thomas Johnson, 5–6 July 1795

To Thomas Johnson

Philadelphia 5[–6]th July 17951

Dear Sir,

Your favor of the 15th Ulto, came to my hands at a time when my attention was much occupied on some matters of importance. To this circumstance, and to my knowledge (as you will perceive by the enclosed extract of a letter from the Secretary of State to the Commissioners of the federal city) that one of your requests had been anticipated;2 and to the expression of your apprehension, that another would probably come too late; is to be ascribed my silence ’till now. I have, however, desired the Secretary of State to give it as my opinion to the Commissioners, that all transactions respecting the square which is in dispute between you, and them (in behalf of the public) ought to be suspended until the pending adjudication is terminated, unless they can assign reasons to the contrary which do not occur to me:3 and I can but again, and again, express my regret, that so unpleasant a dispute should have arisen. But unless the Commissioners are impeached for malpractice in office; or are specifically charged with incapacity and unfitness to discharge the several duties entrusted to them; I do not see on what ground, or with what propriety I could institute an enquiry into their conduct: beyond this, I am sure I should have no right to proceed.

The answer which I gave Mr D. Carroll to a request not dissimilar to the one made by you, but more limited in its object, is herewith inclosed,4 as a just statement (as far as I have recollection) of all the transactions respecting this dispute, that passed between yourself, Messrs Scott and Thornton and me, in the course of my journey to—from—and at Mount Vernon in April last. The letter of those Gentlem. which came to me at that place, did not, even at the moment of its reception, strike me as an official act of the board; but rather as a comment on the existing dispute, and explanatory of the motives which had actuated their conduct.5 In this view, the propriety of ordering a copy to be furnished might be questioned. If it be of record in the office it is already comprehended in the direction they have received in the letter of the 23d Ulto from the Secretary of State to them, a copy of which (instead of an extract) I have this moment received from that office. With the greatest esteem & regard I am—Dear Sir Your obedt and Affecte Servant

Go: Washington

ALS, MdFre; ADfS, DLC:GW; LB, DLC:GW.

1The draft indicates that GW added to the letter on 6 July based on information he had received from Secretary of State Edmund Randolph that day.

2Randolph informed the Commissioners for the District of Columbia on 23 June: “Whatsoever depends upon a legal question, which may arise upon the contest already stirred between yourselves and Mr Johnson, the President does not mean in any manner to regulate. If in aid of your Maryland Counsel you wish the opinion of our Attorney General, I will obtain it for you, upon a statement of the case being transmitted to me. At the same time he is persuaded, that you will not furnish grounds of irritation to those who deal with you, until you shall have fully explored each case, and are satisfied, that the public service will be injured by the omission of the measures, which produce warmth.”

In a section added on 30 June, Randolph wrote: “It is the opinion of the President that Mr Johnson ought to be permitted to have copies of all the entries on your books, containing proceedings of the Board. He is informed that the rules of a Court of equity would probably compel you to this. He however, gives only his private judgment; not meaning to interfere in the management of the suit; nor to substitute his advice for the advice of your counsel” (DNA: RG 59, Domestic Letters).

3Randolph conveyed that message to the commissioners in his letter of 6 July and added that GW “is of opinion, that prudence recommends this step” (DNA: RG 59, Domestic Letters).

4GW referred to his letter to Daniel Carroll of 17 May in answer to Carroll’s letter to him of 10 May. At this point in the draft, GW apparently added the following section after he received Randolph’s comments of 6 July concerning GW’s letter to Johnson.

5GW was referring to the letter and enclosures sent to him by the D.C. commissioners on 20 April.

Index Entries