James Madison Papers
Documents filtered by: Author="Johnson, Richard M." AND Period="Madison Presidency" AND Period="Madison Presidency"
sorted by: relevance
Permanent link for this document:
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Madison/03-11-02-0454

To James Madison from Richard M. Johnson, 10 October 1816

From Richard M. Johnson

Great Crossing 10th Oct. [1816]

Sir,

The judicial vancancy occasioned by the death of Judge Innis will no doubt place before you a number of persons to fill it. Among the persons Spoken of here I have understood that James B. January, Silas M. Noel, Robert Trimble & John T. Mason will be Candi-dates. I shall confine myself to the two prominent characters Trimble & Mason altho all are men of Standing. I am intimately acquainted with both of these Gentlemen. I Know their respective merits. To look at the office merely I Could not make a selection without difficulty so equally ballaced in qualifications—and what Mr Trimble has gained by practical Knowledge is balanced by other considerations in favour of Mr Mason & in less than two years; no man in the western Country would be better qualified that [sic] Mr Mason on account of his extensive law reading, S[illegible] education & his character as a man of business & industry.

The honors which Mr Trimble has rcd. from this State at once Shows that no man Stands higher as a judge & also that it is very uncertain how long he would remain judge if appointed Indeed I am sure the event will prove it if he is appointed, that it is only a temporary arrangement a policy that has almost ruined this State & will injure any Country. I am as certain, that Mr Mason contemplates this Station as a most permanent appointment. To Mr Trimble it will be a real disadvantage as his practice must be double the Salary, & Mr Mason would be benefited & the Country equally Served for Mr Mason is excluded from the Barr & State promotion on acct of his conflicts with some leading federalists in this State & by which contests the republican cause has been strengthed & to his disadvantage & disqualification. I am very certain that with the Republican party Mr Mason’s appointment would be as well rcd as any other in this State & on the subject of active exertions During the war & since the war, Mr Mason’s Claims are far Superior to any that will be before you for this Situation. It may be said the long residence of Mr Tremble gives him a preference It can not give him any claim over Mr Mason who is now a permanent resident & Citizen of this Country, & Mr Mason is as well Known to us as Mr Tremble; as to politics one has been active the other indifferent; one is the lawyer, the other the Lawer & Politician. To give you an idea of the Standing of Mr Mason I will observe that when it was Supposed Mr Clay would be offered some Situation in the Executive Govt Mason & Breckenridge were the only men Who it was Supposed Could be Elected in Mr Clays district against Mr Pope, and Mr Mason would have been fixed upon as the Candidate. With great respect

Rh. M Johnson

RC (DLC). Cover docketed by JM.

Index Entries