Adams Papers
Documents filtered by: Recipient="Adams, Thomas Boylston" AND Period="Jefferson Presidency"
sorted by: date (ascending)
Permanent link for this document:
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Adams/04-15-02-0062

John Quincy Adams to Thomas Boylston Adams, 16 September 1801

John Quincy Adams to Thomas Boylston Adams

New York 16. Septr: 1801.

My dear brother.

On Sunday morning, after a cold and somewhat tedious ride all the preceding night I reached Newark— Pass’d the day and next night there, and on Monday, your sister took me into town with her. I have bespoke my passage for Providence, and am waiting only for a wind. Old Mrs: Smith and her daughter Nancy were very obliging, and the Coll: is friendly and hospitable as usual.— He has introduced me into the republican circles—yesterday we dined at Mr: Brockholst Livingston’s— Tomorrow, if our packet does not sail I am to dine at Mr: Burr’s—and I have exchanged visits with the Mayor1 So you see what good company I am getting into, and may expect a proportionable improvement in my republican principles—

In the meantime the republican practices, are undergoing some of those severe lacerations, to which the man of the People so feelingly describes the necessity of submitting— A pamphlet, under the title of an Examination of the answer to the New-Haven remonstrance has just appeared here— So well written that it has been plausibly though erroneously attributed to Hamilton— He disavows it—and there is such a flaming compliment to him in it, as he certainly would not have ventured under the risque of detection, to pay himself— The writer however is of his sect, and affects to pronounce a sentence of condemnation upon the policy of the late President, for the sake of blazoning Hamilton’s just views and splendid talents.2

It is an easy thing to find fault; and the Man of the People has laid himself so bare to the shaft of censure, that a hand even of small dexterity cannot miss hitting when he is the aim— But when the pamphleteer once departs from that point he appears very deficient in address— Thus he calls upon all parties to unite in the same breath that he insults every party but Hamilton’s— He calls upon the Senate at their meeting to reject the provisional appointments— But he should have known that from the complection of the Senate, his advice to reject could have no other influence upon them than to make them more staunch to confirm.— He threatens repeatedly that the people will resist otherwise than with the pen the system of the New Administration— Old Frederic used to say that a man should never threaten untill prepared to strike— Threats of insurrection for so small an affair as subaltern displacements and placements are absurd and shew ignorance of the character of this people— As far as experience can lead to an opinion there is every reason to suppose that these official revolutions, will for a time strengthen instead of weakening the President’s party among the people— To talk of popular resistance therefore would be folly, even if it were not jacobinism.

But I forbear political topics— If you find your dog Tartar troublesome, Coll: Smith will be much obliged to you to send him on to him— Either by Mr: Wollstonecraft, or by any officer of the army coming from Philadelphia here—3 The Coll: has taken such a fancy to Blanch, that he almost thought it unkind I did not keep one of her pups for him— So I told him I believed you had taken yours more out of complaisance than from inclination, and that you would probably thank him to take it off your hands.— You will therefore keep or send it, as you find most agreeable.— If the latter, perhaps this will come to you time enough to send it on by Whitcomb.

You remember the conversation I had with you a day or two before I left Philadelphia, concerning my property, and the determination I express’d to change what I have in the funds, for something more stable— Let me again recommend to your vigilance to seize any good opportunity that occurs to you for that purpose; and particularly with regard to the 8 per cents— They stand very well now, and now is the time to make a good market for them— But every hour I spend, and every step I proceed in this country, I feel the distrust of all former pledges in support of the national faith growing upon me— Send me a little minute of the monies you paid for me at Philadelphia while we were there and since— I came away without knowing what Mrs: Roberts’s bill will amounted to.

When my wife returns from Washington, if you have spare time, I hope you will escort her on as far as this— I shall probably come on here to meet her myself.

Your affectionate brother

J. Q. A.

RC (private owner, 2007); internal address: “T. B. Adams Esqr.”; endorsed: “J Q Adams Esqr: / 16th: Septr: 1801 / 18th: Do: Recd: / Do Answd:.”

1On his way to Quincy, JQA spent four days in New York City. On 14 Sept. he met with Aaron Burr but found Edward Livingston not at home and was himself out when the mayor returned the visit. On the 15th he and WSS dined with Brockholst Livingston in “a company of fifteen persons, apparently of various political opinions.” On 17 Sept. JQA dined with a large party at Burr’s residence (D/JQA/24, APM Reel 27).

2On 11 Sept. William Coleman pseudonymously published An Examination of the President’s Reply to the New-Haven Remonstrance, N.Y., 1801, Shaw-Shoemaker description begins Ralph R. Shaw and Richard H. Shoemaker, American Bibliography: A Preliminary Checklist for 1801–1819, New York, 1958–1966; 22 vols.; supplemental edn., Early American Imprints, www.readex.com. description ends , No. 326. Writing as Lucius Junius Brutus, Coleman criticized Thomas Jefferson’s appointments, alleging that he had established a “system of removal” in favor of Democratic-Republicans. The pamphlet was written in response to the 23 May removal of Federalist and former congressman Elizur Goodrich as customs collector of the port of New Haven in favor of Samuel Bishop, which prompted an [18 June] remonstrance to Jefferson from eighty New Haven merchants. Jefferson responded on 12 July, writing that his call for national unity in his 4 March inaugural address had been misconstrued as a pledge that officeholders of the opposing party would retain their positions (New York Commercial Advertiser, 11 Sept.; Hamilton, Papers description begins The Papers of Alexander Hamilton, ed. Harold C. Syrett, Jacob E. Cooke, and others, New York, 1961–1987; 27 vols. description ends , 25:419; Jefferson, Papers description begins The Papers of Thomas Jefferson, ed. Julian P. Boyd, Charles T. Cullen, John Catanzariti, Barbara B. Oberg, James P. McClure, and others, Princeton, N.J., 1950– . description ends , 34:vii–viii, 381–384, 554–558; 35:460; Lucius Junius Brutus, An Examination, p. 12, 54).

3Lt. Charles Wollstonecraft (1770–1817) was British writer Mary Wollstonecraft’s brother. He immigrated to the United States in 1792 and served in the Second Regiment of Artillerists and Engineers (Jackson, Papers description begins The Papers of Andrew Jackson, ed. Sam B. Smith, Harriet Chappell Owsley, Harold D. Moser, Daniel Feller, Michael E. Woods, and others, Knoxville, Tenn., 1980– . description ends , 3:136; Hamilton, Papers description begins The Papers of Alexander Hamilton, ed. Harold C. Syrett, Jacob E. Cooke, and others, New York, 1961–1987; 27 vols. description ends , 24:520).

Index Entries