Adams Papers
Documents filtered by: Recipient="King, Rufus" AND Period="Confederation Period"
sorted by: date (ascending)

From John Adams to Rufus King, 23 December 1785

To Rufus King

Grosvenor Square Decr 23. 1785

Sir

I am much obliged to you for your kind Letter of the 2d. of November,1 and hope that a Correspondence So agreably begun may be prosecuted, to the Benefit of the Country We have the Honour to serve. Although I may be not personally known to you,2 the Character uniformly given of your Talents, Application, and publick Spirit, leave me no room to doubt, that I Shall derive much necessary Information from your Letters, and if I am not always able to make an equivalent return, you will charge the Ballance in your Favour to the Publick.

Your Letter has given me great Light, and opened a field to view, of the highest Importance for me to look into.—

You will be amused I doubt not with Letters from this Country, which will hold up a Probability of a Treaty.— political Lies enough appear in the News Papers of my frequent Audiences of the King, of my Visits to Windsor, and of even the Prince of Wales’s Suppers at my house, to make me suspect that Such Allurements will be held out in America.3 These Paragraphs are made for the Stock Exchange, and are fabricated by ministerial Brokers as I suppose, without the least foundation.

There is indeed a Stir at present among some of the Merchants, occasioned by an Application of Lord Carmarthen to four Houses, for their Advice.4 But it is not the Intention of Ministers to make a Treaty, and my Proposal will be answered by an Act of Parliament, not however before the Spring. It is their Design, to regulate the Trade for themselves and they think themselves so necessary to Us, that We shall Submit to what they shall think proper to do.—

If the United States could Act with Unanimity And Spirit, it would be as much for our Advantage perhaps to remain unbound as to theirs and more. If the Eight States you Speak of, should pursue the Plan you mention, and the other five should only lay on heavy Duties upon British Tonnage and prohibit British ships from importing any Thing but the Productions of Great Britain this might answer. This would cutt off Hemp and Duck, Silesia Linnens, Irish Linnens and all East India Goods, and make this Country tingle in every vein.— Irish Productions should be carefully distinguished and confined to Irish Bottoms, or American. This is a great Point for immense quantities of Irish Linnens go now to America in British Bottoms.

Joseph Brant, was Yesterday at the Drawing Room the Ministerial Runners give out, that he is come to demand Compensation for the Indian hunting Ground ceded by the English at the Peace to the United States, and to get something for himself.—as half pay as a Colonel.

The inclosed Arrets of France, please to inclose to Mr Gerry or if you want them in Congress I must beg you to write him an Account of them.5

I hope sir to hear often from you and with the Freedom which becomes a Correspondence between Persons whose Aims are for the publick Good, and I pray you to consider me as your Friend & humble servt

John Adams

RC (NHi:Rufus King Papers) and enclosures with English translations by John Pintard (PCC, No. 80, II, f. 278–308); internal address: “The Honbl. Rufus King Esqr.”; notation on final page of the second enclosure: “For Mr Gerry / J.A.” LbC (Adams Papers description begins Manuscripts and other materials, 1639–1889, in the Adams Manuscript Trust collection given to the Massachusetts Historical Society in 1956 and enlarged by a few additions of family papers since then. Citations in the present edition are simply by date of the original document if the original is in the main chronological series of the Papers and therefore readily found in the microfilm edition of the Adams Papers (APM). description ends ); APM Reel 113.

1Vol. 17:562–564.

2JA may not have known Rufus King, but he knew King’s father, the loyalist Richard, whom he represented in 1774 in the case of King v. Stewart. The elder King sought damages from an incident at Scarborough, Maine, in 1766 when a patriot mob broke into his home and store and terrorized his wife and children, including ten-year-old Rufus (JA, Legal Papers description begins Legal Papers of John Adams, ed. L. Kinvin Wroth and Hiller B. Zobel, Cambridge, 1965; 3 vols. description ends , 1:106–140).

3These reports, which appeared in the London Chronicle of 6–8 Dec. 1785, were false; see also AA’s virtually identical comment in her 20 Dec. letter to Thomas Jefferson (AFC description begins Adams Family Correspondence, ed. L. H. Butterfield, Marc Friedlaender, Richard Alan Ryerson, Margaret A. Hogan, and others, Cambridge, 1963– . description ends , 6:496, 497).

4For further comments on the Pitt ministry’s consultations with merchants about Anglo-American commerce, see JA’s first letter to John Jay of 4 Jan. 1786, and note 3, below.

5These were the arrêts of 18 and 25 Sept. 1785 that JA originally intended to enclose with his 13 Dec. letter to Elbridge Gerry, for which see that letter and note 3, above. This letter and the arrêts went on the Jan. 1786 packet, the Duke of Cumberland, which reached New York City on 25 March (New York Packet, 27 March; from Rufus King, 4 May, below; Smith, Letters of Delegates description begins Letters of Delegates to Congress, 1774–1789, ed. Paul H. Smith and others, Washington, D.C., 1976–2000; 26 vols. description ends , 23:210). The final page of the printed copy of the arrêts received by King contained the notation “For Mr Gerry / J.A.” Although the notation indicated that they were to go to Gerry, he was at Boston when the letter arrived, so King gave the printed arrêts to Jay, who, after obtaining translations, submitted them to Congress on 27 April (PCC, No. 80, II, f. 275–276; JCC description begins Journals of the Continental Congress, 1774–1789, ed. Worthington Chauncey Ford, Gaillard Hunt, John C. Fitzpatrick, Roscoe R. Hill, and others, Washington, D.C., 1904–1937; 34 vols. description ends , 30:212). Gerry apparently wrote to King about the absence of the arrêts from his 13 Dec. 1785 letter from JA, to which King replied on 9 April 1786 with an explanation. King also wrote to the Boston merchant Jonathan Jackson on 22 April, informing him of the French decrees and promising to send him copies following their translation (Smith, Letters of Delegates description begins Letters of Delegates to Congress, 1774–1789, ed. Paul H. Smith and others, Washington, D.C., 1976–2000; 26 vols. description ends , 23:226, 248–249). For King’s comments on the arrêts, see the letter to Jackson and King’s letters to JA of 4 and 5 May, both below.

Index Entries