Adams Papers
Documents filtered by: Author="Jay, John" AND Period="Confederation Period"
sorted by: editorial placement
Permanent link for this document:
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Adams/06-19-02-0011

To John Adams from John Jay, 21 February 1787

From John Jay

New York 21st. February 1787

Dr Sir

I had the Pleasure of receiving two Days ago your Letter of the 30th. November by Mr. Mitchel1—it was the next Morning laid before Congress.—

Nine States are now represented, but as yet little Progress has been made in the Business before them. My Report on the Infractions of the Treaty complained of by Britain, has been referred to a new Committee, and I think a very good one; various Opinions prevail on the Subject and I cannot conjecture what the ultimate Decision of Congress on it will be.—

The Insurrection in Massachusetts seems to be suppressed, and I herewith enclose the Papers containing the Details we have received since the 6th. Instant, when I wrote to you by the Packet.2 Your Sentiments on that Business prove to have been just. I ought to write to you fully on many Subjects, but I am not yet enabled—when I shall be cannot be predicted. Our Government is unequal to the Task assigned it, and the People begin also to perceive its Inefficiency. The Convention gains Ground— New York has instructed her Delegates to move in Congress for a Recommendation to the States to form a Convention; for this State dislikes the Idea of a Convention unless countenanced by Congress.3 I do not promise myself much further immediate Good from the Measure than that it will tend to approximate the public Mind to the Changes which ought to take place. It is hard to say what those Changes should be exactly—there is one however which I think would be much for the better, Vizt. to distribute the fœderal Sovereignty into its three proper Departments of executive, legislative and judicial; for that Congress should act in these different Capacities was I think a great Mistake in our Policy.—

This State in their present Session has greatly moderated their Severities to the Tories; a Law having been passed to restore a very great Majority of those resident here to the Rights of Citizens. I hope all Discriminations inconsistent with the Treaty of Peace will gradually be abolished, as Resentment gives place to Reason and good Faith. But, my Dear Sir, we labour under one sad Evil, the Treasury is empty though the Country abounds in Resources, and our People are far more unwilling than unable to pay Taxes.— Hence result Disappointment to our Creditors, Disgrace to our Country, and I fear Disinclination in too many to any Mode of Government than can easily and irresistably open their Purses. Much is to be done, and the Patriots must have Perseverance as well as Patience.—

I am, Dr Sir, / Your afft. Friend and Servt:

John Jay—

RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “The Honorable John Adams Esqr: / Minister Plenipo: of the Ud. States / at the Court of London—”; endorsed by AA: “Mr Jay 21 Febry / 1787.”

1Vol. 18:512–513. Possibly Michael Mitchel, who left Boston in Jan. 1783 to “establish an American House” in Bordeaux, according to AA (AFC description begins Adams Family Correspondence, ed. L. H. Butterfield, Marc Friedlaender, Richard Alan Ryerson, Margaret A. Hogan, Sara Martin, and others, Cambridge, 1963– . description ends , 5:64, 66–67; 6:index).

2Not found, but Jay likely referred to newspaper reports regarding the final suppression of Shays’ Rebellion on 4 Feb. 1787 (vol. 18:552).

3On 21 Feb., Congress resolved that “on the second Monday in May next a Convention of delegates who shall have been appointed by the several States be held at Philadelphia for the sole and express purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation,” thereby sustaining “the preservation of the Union” (JCC description begins Journals of the Continental Congress, 1774–1789, ed. Worthington Chauncey Ford, Gaillard Hunt, John C. Fitzpatrick, Roscoe R. Hill, and others, Washington, D.C., 1904–1937; 34 vols. description ends , 32:74). Jay’s mention of it here marked JA’s first confirmed news of what soon became the Constitutional Convention, which Samuel Osgood had raised as a possibility several months earlier (vol. 18:507).

Index Entries