Thomas Jefferson Papers
Documents filtered by: Date="1797-08-05"
sorted by: date (ascending)

To Thomas Jefferson from James Madison, 5 August 1797

From James Madison

Orange Aug. 5. 1797

Dear Sir

Yours of the 3d. arrived safe yesterday. I will converse with Col. Monroe, as you desire, on the subject of his letter to you, and listen to all his reasons for the opinion he gives. My present conviction is opposed to it. I have viewed the subject pretty much in the light you do. I consider it moreover as a ticklish experiment to say publickly yes or no to the interrogatories of party spirit. It may bring on dilemmas, not to be particularly foreseen, of disagreeable explanations, or tacit confessions. Hitherto the Precedents have been the other way. The late President was silent for many years as to the letters imputed to him, and it would seem, deposited in the office of State only, the answer which the zeal of the Secretary communicated to the public. Mr. Adams has followed the example with respect to Callendar’s charge, probably well founded, of advising the extermination of the Tories. Col. M. thinks that honest men would be encouraged by your owning and justifying the letter to Mazzei. I rather suspect it would be a gratification and triumph to their opponents; and that out of the unfixed part of the Community more converts would be gained by the popularity of Gen: Washington, than by the kind of proof that must be relied on against it.

Wishing to return the “Petition &c” to your Court as you recommend, I must be brief on that subject. It is certainly of great importance to set the public opinion right with regard to the functions of grand juries, and the dangerous abuse of them in the federal Courts: nor could a better occasion occur. If there be any doubts in the case, they must flow from the uncertainty of getting a numerous subscription, or of embarking the Legislature in the business. On these points the two gentlemen you mean to consult can judge much better than I can do. The Petition in its tenor, cannot certainly be mended. I have noted with a pencil, the passages which may perhaps be better guarded against cavil.

  • (1) The term “appoint,” strictly taken includes the Senate, as well as, Executive.
  • (2) Is it true that the foreign members of the late Grand-jury, lie under all the defects ascribed to them? I am a stranger even to their names.
  • (3) “within the same” Does not impeachment extend to crimes committed elsewhere, by those amenable to our laws?
  • (4) “such as resided within the American lines during the whole war.” Would not this apply to persons who came here during the war, and were faithful, to the end of it. Gallatin is an example. Would such a partial disfranchisement of persons already naturalized be a proper precedent? The benefit of stating the evil to the public might be preserved and the difficulty avoided, by confining the remedy to future naturalizations, or by a general reference of it to the wisdom of the Legislature. This last may be a good expedient throughout the Petition, in case the assembly cannot be relied on to adopt the specific remedies prayed for.
  • (5) This change is, to avoid the term “expressly” which has been a subject of controversy, and rather decided against by the public opinion.

Your letter of the 24 has come to hand since mine by Mr. B. It is so much our inclination to comply with its invitations that you may be assured it will be done if any wise practicable. I have engagements, however, on hand of sundry kinds which forbid a promise to myself on that head. The situation of my health may be another obstacle. I was attacked the night before last, very severely by something like a cholera morbus or bilious cholic, of which, tho’ much relieved, I still feel the effects, and it is not quite certain what turn the complaint may take. Adieu affecly,

Js. Madison Jr

RC (DLC: Madison Papers); endorsed by TJ as received 7 Aug. 1797 and so recorded in SJL.

His letter to you: Monroe to TJ, 12 July 1797.

Washington remained silent concerning the letters imputed to him that were published in London in 1777 and in New York in 1778. When the forged letters reappeared in pamphlet form in 1795 and 1796 and in the Philadelphia Aurora, Washington, on his final day in office, wrote a letter to Timothy Pickering, describing the forgeries and instructing him to deposit the letter in the State Department records. On 9 Mch. Pickering sent Washington’s letter to the Gazette of the United States where it was published the next day and subsequently printed in other newspapers, including the Aurora on 11 Mch. (Fitzpatrick, Writings, description begins John C. Fitzpatrick, ed., The Writings of George Washington, Washington, D.C., 1931–44, 39 vols. description ends xxxv, 350, 363–5, 414–16; Letters from General Washington to Several of His Friends, in June and July, 1776 [Philadelphia, 1795]; Epistles Domestic, Confidential, and Official, from General Washington, Written about the Commencement of the American Contest, When He Entered on the Command of the Army of the United States… [New York, 1796], 1-66; Freeman, Washington, description begins Douglas Southall Freeman, George Washington, New York, 1948–57, 7 vols.; 7th volume by J. A. Carroll and M. W. Ashworth description ends vii, 435–6).

James T. Callender’s charge was that John Adams, while in Amsterdam as minister to the Netherlands, wrote Lieutenant Governor Thomas Cushing of Massachusetts on 15 Dec. 1780, asserting that he had advocated fines, imprisonment, and hanging for those Americans who collaborated with the British. In the letter, which according to the account was found in a prize vessel and published in The Annual Register for 1781, Adams exclaimed that he would have hanged his own brother “if he had took a part with our enemy in this contest” (The American Annual Register, or, Historical Memoirs of the United States, for the Year 1796 [Philadelphia, 1797], 234–5; The Annual Register, or a View of the History, Politics, and Literature, For the Year 1781, 2d ed. [London, 1791], pt. 1, 258–61). When Adams brought this letter to John Marshall’s attention in early 1801 after it was once again published, Adams declared it to be a British forgery and insisted that he “never wrote any Letter in the least degree resembling it” to Cushing or to any one else. He asked Marshall to file his declaration and gave him permission to publish it if he thought fit (Marshall, Papers, description begins Herbert A. Johnson, Charles T. Cullen, Charles F. Hobson, and others, eds., The Papers of John Marshall, Chapel Hill, 1974–2006, 12 vols. description ends vi, 76–7).

I have noted with a pencil: see Petition to Virginia House of Delegates, at 3 Aug. 1797.

Index Entries