Adams Papers
Documents filtered by: Date="1785-11-18"
sorted by: date (ascending)

To John Adams from Wilhem & Jan Willink and Nicolaas & Jacob van Staphorst, [1]8 November 1785

From Wilhem & Jan Willink and Nicolaas & Jacob van Staphorst

Amsterdam Novem [1]8 1785.1


We acknowledge the Receit of Your Esteemed Favoúr of the 12th. Instt. advising ús your further acceptances of

£100.– }
″100.– drawn by Mr. Barclay Order Mr Grand
″150.– } drawn by Mr. John Lamb Order Mr Grand.

Which Will duely be discharged When dúe by Mess: C & R Puller in London—2

Mr. Jefferson has in Consequence of a Credit of £1000— Stg. Lodged by yoú in his Favoúr dated 19 May 1785. drawn on Messrs. Van den Yver £6500lt3 & Shall undoubtedly dispose of the Whole Credit on them; as yoúr Excelly. has not given ús the least notice of this Credit, We have not been able to advice Sd. Gentlemen thereof, Whereby Such drafts might Run great hazard not to be paid, to prevent Such mistakes, We must beg your Excelly. to favoúr ús With an Exact and timely Notice of all his transactions.4

We have the Honoúr to Remain Very Respectfully. / Sir / Your Excelly. mot Obedt. / Humble Servants.

Wilhem & Jan Willink
Nichs. & Jacob van Staphorst

RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “To His Excelly. John Adams Esqr. / London.”

1The date is derived from this being a response to JA’s 12 Nov. letter, for which see note 2.

2In his 12 Nov. letter JA indicated that he had accepted five bills, totaling £600, drawn by Thomas Barclay and John Lamb on Richard & Charles Puller to the account of the United States. The same day JA informed the Pullers that he had accepted the bills and that they would be paid by the consortium (both LbC’s, APM Reel 111).

3Despite the English pound sign, the figure given is, as the consortium indicates, in livres tournois.

4In his 13 Dec. reply (LbC, APM Reel 111) JA took issue with the consortium’s account of the transaction and his failure to inform them of it. There he wrote that he could not have given “Notice of a Credit which I never gave” and attributed the bankers’ comments to “some mistake in your figures.” JA noted that he had drawn “once for 6 or 7000 thousand Guilders for Mr. Jefferson & gave a Credit to Coll Humphry’s for £1000 stg: to pay for honorary swords & medals for our Generals &c But I have never given any other Credit.” For the credit of ƒ6,000 that JA drew on the consortium in Thomas Jefferson’s favor, see JA’s 10 Oct. 1784 letter to the consortium, vol. 16:339–340, wherein he also inquired whether there was sufficient money in the consortium’s hands to pay “about a Thousand Pounds sterling” to David Humphreys to enable him to “execute Some orders of Congress.” The consortium replied that there were sufficient funds, but JA did not then draw on it for the sum (same, p. 359). Then, seven months later, on 19 May 1785, he wrote to Jefferson (Jefferson, Papers description begins The Papers of Thomas Jefferson, ed. Julian P. Boyd, Charles T. Cullen, John Catanzariti, Barbara B. Oberg, and others, Princeton, N.J., 1950–. description ends , 8:157) and to Van den Yver Frères & Co. (private owner, 2008) that the draft for Humphreys would be honored, but he apparently never informed the consortium.

Index Entries