George Washington Papers
Documents filtered by: Date="1780-05-14"
sorted by: date (ascending)
Permanent link for this document:
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Washington/03-26-02-0011

From George Washington to James Duane, 14 May 1780

To James Duane

Morris Tow[n] May 14th 1780

Dr Sir

The arrival of the Marquis De La Fayette opens a prospect which offers the most important advantages to these states if proper measures are adopted to improve it. He announces an intention of his Court to send a fleet and army to cooperate effectually with us. In the present state of our finances, and in the total emptiness of our magazines, a plan must be concerted to bring out the resources of the country with vigour and decision. This I think you will agree with me cannot be effected, if the measures to be taken should Depend on the slow deliberations of a body so large as Congress; admitting the best disposition in every member to promote the objects in view. It appears to me of the greatest importance and even of absolute necessity, that a small Committee should be immediately appointed to reside near Head Quarters vested with all the powers which Congress have, so far as respects the purpose of a full cooperation with the French fleet and army on the Continent. Their authority should be plenipotentiary to draw out men and supplies of every kind and to give their sanction to any operations which The Commander in Chief may not think himself at liberty to undertake without it as well beyond as within the limits of these states. This Committee can act with dispatch and energy—by being on the spot it will be able to provide for exigences as they arise and the better to judge of their nature and urgency.1 The plans in contemplation may be opened to them with more freedom and confidence than to a numerous body—where secreccy is impossible, where the indiscretion of a single member, by disclosing may defeat the project.2

I need not enlarge on the advantages of such a measure as I flatter myself they will all occur to you and that you will be ready to propose and give it all your support. The conjuncture is one of the most critical and importante we have seen—all our prudence and exertions are requisite to give it a favourable issue—hesitancy and delay would in all probability ruin our affairs. Circumstanced as we are the greatest good or the greatest ill must result. We shall probably fix the independence of America if we succeed and if we fail the abilities3 of the state will have been so strained in the attempt, that a total relaxation and debility must ensue and the worst is to be apprehended.4 These consideratio⟨ns⟩ should determine Congress to forgo all inferior objects and unite with mutual confidence in those measures which seem best calculated to ensure success.

There is no man who can be more useful as a member of The Committee than General Schuyler. His perfect knowlege of the resources of the country—the activity of his temper his fruitfulness of expedients and his sound military sense make me wish above all things he may be appointed. I have also a very favourable opinion of Mr Mathews’ understanding and integrity, and I should be willing to trust every thing to the goodness of the others intentions, if I had not some doubts of his discretion. I wish The Chancellor or yourself could be in the appointment.5 A well composed committee is of primary importance—I need not hint that the delicacy of these intimations fits them only for your private ear.

The opinion I have of your friendship induces me thus freely and confidentially to impart my sentiments on the occasion and I shall be very happy you may agree with me in judgment.6 I am with the greatest esteem & regard Dr Sir Your most Obedt.

Df, in Alexander Hamilton’s writing, DLC:GW; Varick transcript, DLC:GW.

1The Committee at Headquarters, established in early April to confer with GW about supply issues, agreed that stronger measures would be necessary in anticipation of the French expeditionary force. On this day, the committee drafted a memorandum advising “the Gentleman [John Mathews] going to Congress to State the Necessity of delegating to a Small Committe or other persons to be appointed, with advice of the Commander in Chief, Ample Powers for Drawing forth the resources of the Country on this interesting ocasion—to make immediate applications to the Several States to repeal any Laws they may have made inhibiting Continental agents or officers from purchasing on this ocasion to invest for a limited time, in Congress or Such persons as Congress may appoint Dictatorial Powers—to pass Laws authorizg Congress or Such persons … to enable our Military force, and that of our ally to operate with Vigour” (Smith, Letters of Delegates description begins Paul H. Smith et al., eds. Letters of Delegates to Congress, 1774–1789. 26 vols. Washington, D.C., 1976–2000. description ends , 15:123–25).

Committee at Headquarters member Philip Schuyler already had written Duane from Morristown on 13 May to express his belief that supplies could be procured, “but not In the ordinary way.” To overcome congressional inertia, he proposed “dictatorial powers” for GW and a small congressional committee (Smith, Letters of Delegates description begins Paul H. Smith et al., eds. Letters of Delegates to Congress, 1774–1789. 26 vols. Washington, D.C., 1976–2000. description ends , 15:122–23). In his reply of 21 May, Duane advised Schuyler of “the obstacles” to such a committee, which he claimed were “deep seated” (Smith, Letters of Delegates description begins Paul H. Smith et al., eds. Letters of Delegates to Congress, 1774–1789. 26 vols. Washington, D.C., 1976–2000. description ends , 15:167–68).

Acting on 19 May, Congress gave additional powers for sixty days to the Committee at Headquarters, making that body ultimately responsible for drawing supplies from the states (see Samuel Huntington to GW, 20 May, and n.4 to that document, and JCC description begins Worthington Chauncey Ford et al., eds. Journals of the Continental Congress, 1774-1789. 34 vols. Washington, D.C., 1904–37. description ends , 17:437–41; see also Committee at Headquarters report, 15 May, and Robert R. Livingston to Schuyler, 21 May, in Smith, Letters of Delegates description begins Paul H. Smith et al., eds. Letters of Delegates to Congress, 1774–1789. 26 vols. Washington, D.C., 1976–2000. description ends , 15:127–28, 169–70).

2Hamilton wrote and then lined out at this point: “and their concurrence in particular points may give tend to give our military operations a ⟨illegible⟩ degree of boldness which they might otherwise want.”

3Hamilton inadvertently wrote “abilitities.”

4At this point, Hamilton wrote and then crossed out: “Our fate seems to hang on the cast of this die.”

5“The Chancellor” refers to Robert R. Livingston, the chancellor of New York since 1777.

6For a similar appeal, see GW to Joseph Jones, this date.

Index Entries