George Washington Papers
Documents filtered by: Correspondent="Washington, George" AND Correspondent="Board of War"
sorted by: editorial placement
Permanent link for this document:
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Washington/03-26-02-0394

From George Washington to the Board of War, 25 June 1780

To the Board of War

Whippeny [N.J.] June 25th 1780

Gentn

I have been honoured with Your several Letters of the 17th—19th & 20, which the constant movements of the Army have prevented me from answering till this time. With respect to the subject of the first and of the Letter it inclosed for General Howe—I beg leave to inform the Board it had long since claimed my particular attention and every measure had been taken by me that appeared practicable to obtain and forward Supplies of provision for the post at West point.1 The route by which that must go, which comes from the Southward must be governed from time to time as it has been, by the movements & situation of the Enemy, on which head the Commissary and Quarter Master & other persons employed in the transportation will be regularly advised that it may be secure. There are no unnecessary Stores at West point that I know of; so far from it, those which are there are less than they ought to be, if our circumstances would admit of a better supply. The Stores which were at Fish Kill and which possibly might have been exposed—on a serious movement by the Enemy, have been brought down to the River & embarked in Vessels provided for the purpose.2 A particular account of the provisions forwarded by the Associators will be kept by the receiving Commissary who will be directed to give receipts for it also. This exertion will contribute greatly to our relief—and reflects the highest honor on the Gentlemen concerned in it.3

The Board will be pleased to receive a confirmation of the sentences against Capn Coren & Lt Godfrey.4

With respect to the application in favor of Lt Conolly’s Son5 I do not conceive myself authorised to grant it. I have never in a single instance undertaken to give permission to an Officer to go beyond Sea—and whenever requests for the purpose have been made immediately to me—they have been refered to Congress or the parties applying informed that it was necessary. I return the Board Doctor Shield’s Letter on the subject—which they will if they think proper be pleased to lay before Congress.6 I should have been happy if it had been in my power to have obliged the Doctor, whose zeal & attachment to our cause seem to give him a claim to every consistent notice in his applications.7

I am informed that Lt Colo. Ramsay is desirous that Lt Colo. Connolly should be permitted to go to New York to endeavour to effect their exchange or to return in a limited number of days.8 and by a Letter of the 16th from Colo. Magaw to Colo. Harrison received yesterday that it is also the Board’s wish.9 I should be very happy in the final exchange of Colo. Ramsay, and as the State of Maryland who claim Colo. Conolly as their prisoner, have expressed their wish to appropriate him particularly to it, there can be no objection to his going to New York to endeavour to effect it.10 Lt Colo. Conolly’s exchange under the circumstances of his case should be particularly restricted to that of Lt Colo. Ramsays, or the Enemy may undertake to place it in favor of some other Officer & probably One of the Violators of parole. When he goes to New York, he should proceed immediately to Elizabeth Town.11 I have the Honor to be with great respect & esteem Gent. Yr Most Obedt st

G.W.

Df, in Robert Hanson Harrison’s writing, DLC:GW; copy (extract), DNA:PCC, item 147; Varick transcript, DLC:GW. The extract consists of the third paragraph only.

1For recent efforts to forward provisions to West Point, see GW to Robert Howe, 25 May, and 1 and 3 June.

5The word “Son” and the apostrophe and “s” in the previous word are written over the word “Coan.”

6On 20 June the board wrote GW: “The Board do themselves the honor to inclose you a letter from Dr Shiells, respecting an application of Lt Connolly Coan, to go to Ireland for the recovery of his health.

“They would not have troubled your Excy, at this time on such an occasion, if they had not been well inform’d, that this gentleman’s health is in such a situation as to admit of but little delay” (LS, DLC:GW). The enclosed letter from Hugh Shiell has not been identified.

7The board presented Congress with Shiell’s letter on 29 June, and a resolution passed the next day that permitted Lt. Conolly Coane to return to Ireland on parole for health reasons (see JCC description begins Worthington Chauncey Ford et al., eds. Journals of the Continental Congress, 1774-1789. 34 vols. Washington, D.C., 1904–37. description ends , 17:578).

8On 21 June, Charles Willson Peale wrote GW: “Knowing Colo: Ramseys oppinion of what would be the difficulties, and also what the most certain mode to obt⟨ai⟩n his Exchange, I had applyed to some Gentlemen of Congress and the board of War, to obtain Liberty for Lieut. Coll Conolley to go into New York on parole. I did not make my application to them as a Body, but Individually, and am Informed that the power of granting my request rests with your Excellency. You know how far the importunity of Conolley when on the spot will opperate towards effecting this Exchange. My Intention is only to lay the Matter before you, and if it is your pleasure to give the permission, I flatter myself that I shall be happy in having Coll Ramsey Relieved from Captivity” (ALS, PHi: Gratz Collection; ADfS, PPAmP; Sprague transcript, with cover and docket in Robert Hanson Harrison’s writing, DLC:GW; mutilated material is supplied in angle brackets from the Sprague transcript).

9This letter has not been identified.

10Maryland officials wanted to exchange Loyalist lieutenant colonel John Connolly for one of their own officers (see the Board of War to GW, 25 April, and n.1 to that document; see also Maryland Council to GW, 8 April).

11For Connolly’s exchange, see GW to Abraham Skinner, 7 Oct. (DLC:GW).

Index Entries