Adams Papers
Documents filtered by: Correspondent="Shaw, William Smith"
sorted by: date (ascending)
Permanent link for this document:
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Adams/04-13-02-0154

Abigail Adams to William Smith Shaw, 20 December 1798

Abigail Adams to William Smith Shaw

Quincy Decbr 20th 1798

you are very good dear William in your attentions towards me, and I receive the papers regularly which will now become more interesting as Congress proceed in buisness. yours of the 10 & 12 of december I have received this week.1 the Aurora shows that tho Bache is dead, he yet speaketh, or rather that the party which supported him, are determined to have a press devoted to them. whether the influence is foreign or domestick, or both together it is of concequence that it should be made to keep within the bounds of decorum, and if we had not a milk and water A   T G—ll the Rasscalls should yeald to the Laws—2 I expect we shall have to use some of the tribute due to Tallyrand before the daring Spirit, of Kentucky, and its Mother state will be quiet.3 I have no great opinion of more decisive measures being adopted by Congress than have been, at least I fear so. some of our warm Spirits think the Presidents speech tho firm, very cool & moderate to what they expected. even Jarvis says it is mild— it is what it ought to be, not a personal feeling in it, but as connected with the honour and dignity of the Nation.

I am rejoiced to hear you are so well pleased, and happy, and that mr Brisler has a Good servant in lieu of John but if he is a Foreigner, however he may understand his buisness I am certain, judging from the experience I have had from my first going to Philadelphia, a few months will prove him either intemperate or dishonest, perhaps both, such have been every one which we have yet had. I therefore more highly prize an American whose Character has stood Eleven years trial and whose countanance looks like temperance, and whose manners are civil decent and becomeing— I believe mr Brisler will find him to wear better, than any of the foreign servants. I should therefore wish to have him Confided in, if he is found deserving—

I heard from your Mother this week.4 she is well. I have been much better for these three last weeks, than for four months before. I have had good rest, all but one Night, and that was when I read in the paper, that the President was so indisposed as not to be able to attend Congress, to deliver his speech: my dear doctor used to say, I do not want to ask you how you do. I met the President, and I saw by his looks how you were— I hope he will keep up his spirits, and that we shall meet again with more agreable prospects of Health, than the last summer afforded; your uncle Cranch rode out yesterday, and made me a visit. he is better— I am anxious; very much so, for my dear Thomas—a dreadfull coast, & a cold threatning winter, the worst of seasons to come Home in, but I must commit him to a kind providence which has Singularly favourd my Family, in all their various voyages why should I distrust?

Louissa says I may send her Love to you, tho it is not of that nature which mrs Willing described If it was mrs George Willing, I do not think she has ever recoverd from her dizziness—

I believe by your annecdote of dr Logan, that the Chronical told truth for once!!— I know not why he should regreet, words of course— a poor creature! my Love to mrs otis I will write to her soon— my pens are bad; Bobby does not come often enough to keep them in good order— I am your affectionate

Aunt A A

RC (DLC:Shaw Family Papers); addressed: “Mr William S Shaw / Philadelphia”; endorsed: “Mrs Adams / received 29th Dec / Answered 30th Dec / 1798”; docketed: “1798 / Decr 10.”

1Shaw’s brief letter of [10 Dec.] commented on JA’s 8 Dec. address to Congress and also JA’s health (Adams Papers).

2That is, U.S. attorney general Charles Lee.

3AA was referring to the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions, which were political resolves drafted in secret by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, respectively, in opposition to the Alien and Sedition Acts. Together, they questioned the nature of federalism within the United States prior to the formation of an institutionalized party system. The Kentucky Resolutions stated in unwavering language that the federal government had exceeded its constitutional powers, arguing that the Alien and Sedition Acts were “unauthoritative, void, and of no force” and claiming that if the acts were not repealed they might “drive these states into revolution and blood.” John Breckinridge introduced the resolutions in the Ky. house of representatives on 8 November. They passed the house on 10 Nov., the senate three days later, and were approved by Gov. James Garrard on 16 November. In the Virginia Resolutions, Madison affirmed his support for the Constitution and the “Union of the States” but argued that the Alien and Sedition Acts were unconstitutional. He criticized the government’s interpretation of the Constitution, alleging that it had attempted “to enlarge its powers by forced constructions of the constitutional charter which defines them.” But whereas Jefferson declared the acts were illegitimate, Madison left it to the states “to interpose for arresting the progress of the evil.” John Taylor introduced the resolutions in the Va. House of Delegates on 10 Dec., but they were successfully challenged by Federalists George Keith Taylor and Henry Lee, resulting in the incorporation of more temperate language. The resolutions passed the lower house on 21 Dec. and the senate on 24 Dec., after which Gov. James Wood signed them (Jefferson, Papers description begins The Papers of Thomas Jefferson, ed. Julian P. Boyd, Charles T. Cullen, John Catanzariti, Barbara B. Oberg, James P. McClure, and others, Princeton, N.J., 1950–. description ends , 30:529–556; Madison, Papers, Congressional Series description begins The Papers of James Madison: Congressional Series, ed. William T. Hutchinson, William M. E. Rachal, and Robert Allen Rutland, Chicago and Charlottesville, Va., 1962–1991; 17 vols. description ends , 17:185–191; Douglas Bradburn, “A Clamor in the Public Mind: Opposition to the Alien and Sedition Acts,” WMQ description begins William and Mary Quarterly. description ends , 3d ser., 65:565–600 [July 2008]).

4Not found.

Index Entries