Adams Papers
Documents filtered by: Author="Lovell, James" AND Period="Washington Presidency" AND Correspondent="Lovell, James" AND Correspondent="Adams, John"
sorted by: recipient
Permanent link for this document:
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Adams/06-20-02-0125

To John Adams from James Lovell, 19 December 1789

From James Lovell

Boston Decr 19th. 1789.

Sir

Though I know your extreme Delicacy as to any Interference in the executive Affairs of the U.Ss. yet to you I must apply; for, Heaven & Secretary Jackson know I may be chagrined in an Attempt to address the President.

I am in Dread least an Action should take Place which will renew the Vigour of the Opponents & damp the Spirit of the Friends of Government: And, it will be out of Time to await the Motions of a deliberate Legislature

The enclosed Copy of a Letter will explain my Dread.1 If it appears well-founded and of sufficient Importance to call for a speedy Remedy, a very mild but efficacious one may be suggested. The President may see the circular Instruction of Octr 31st. and advise that it be immediately followed by another stating the Point “to appear, upon Review, to be of such a Kind as to need, perhaps, Legislative Attention”; and therefore proposing to the Collectors to stay all Proceedings therein “till they hear again from the Treasury.[”]

I am totally rong in my Conceptions of the Business, or else it may be expected that one single Suit commenced in each of the States would produce a Multitude of News paper Suggestions of a very unpleasant Sort both respecting the General Government and its new Law Courts.

Am I consummately impudent in this Application? Whatever may be your Judgement of it, you may be assured I will attribute so much of that Charge to myself as to keep my Doings herein a profound Secret.

I am endeavouring to break the Neck of some Enemies to the french Consulate here. You must know I admire that Institution, because by the Kings Ordonnances it’s Chancery has all the Spirit & Essence of our Jury of Equals.

The Herald inclosed proclaims my first Onset, as the Printer of it did not feel my sly Knock at his Licentiousness so sensibly as to refuse me the Use of his Types.2

Here, I am aground: For, as your Lady has all my Regards, what have I left for You? The Jus Mariti3 must relieve me. Demand your Quantum from the Bone of your Bone or as RTP Esquire would quaintly gallicize it—from that Bonne of You Bon.

James Lovell

RC and enclosure (Adams Papers); internal address: “His Excellency / John Adams”; endorsed: “Mr Lovel 19. Decr. / 1789.”

1Lovell enclosed a copy of his 17 Dec. letter to Benjamin Lincoln, expressing reluctance to comply with the collector’s 16 Dec. request for a record of Boston imports from 1 to 10 August. Once the Tariff Act took effect on 1 Aug., importers were required to pay certain customs, but they were allowed a grace period until local collecting houses were established; in Boston, they were formally created on 10 August. Lovell argued that an interim collection was unfair to importers who had sold their goods and that it targeted ports with better records. Responding to critics, Alexander Hamilton sent a circular letter on 31 Oct. to the nation’s port collectors stipulating that while customs must be collected to fund the debt, moderation was key. The backlash continued, and on 30 Dec. Hamilton again issued a circular letter. There, the treasury secretary admitted that the new policy was problematic, and he recommended that Congress revise the plan in its second session (Hamilton, Papers description begins The Papers of Alexander Hamilton, ed. Harold C. Syrett, Jacob E. Cooke, and others, New York, 1961–1987; 27 vols. description ends , 5:478–479; 6:39, 290).

2Despite his lack of an appointment, Lovell continued to monitor the politics of the port. When Philippe André Joseph de Létombe, the French consul at Boston, was suspected of forcing a French intendant to sign for supplies that may not have been delivered, Lovell intervened in the press. He trained his criticism on Létombe’s accuser, Louis Baury de Bellerive. Originally from St. Domingue, Bellerive (1754–1807) was a French officer who fought in the Continental Army and aided in the suppression of Shays’ Rebellion. Claiming that the charge was “false in the groundwork,” Lovell issued a four-letter defense of Létombe, which began appearing in Edmund Freeman’s Herald of Freedom the day before Lovell wrote this letter to JA. Bellerive fired back via the same newspaper, replying that Lovell had “too much of my contempt to merit further notice” (vol. 14:159; Boston Herald of Freedom, 18, 22, 25 Dec. 1789, 5 Jan. 1790; Reports of Committees of the House of Representatives Made during the First Session of the Thirty-second Congress, Washington, D.C., 1852, 147:1; AFC description begins Adams Family Correspondence, ed. L. H. Butterfield, Marc Friedlaender, Richard Alan Ryerson, Margaret A. Hogan, Sara Martin, Hobson Woodward, and others, Cambridge, 1963–. description ends , 9:173). On the mounting significance of fraud in New England ports, see Stephen Higginson’s letter of 21 Dec. 1789, and note 1, below.

3The legal right of a husband to acquire his wife’s estate by virtue of marriage (Black, Law Dictionary description begins Henry Campbell Black, Black’s Law Dictionary: Definitions of the Terms and Phrases of American and English Jurisprudence, Ancient and Modern, St. Paul, Minn., 1979, 5th edn. description ends ).

Index Entries