George Washington Papers
Documents filtered by: Period="Revolutionary War" AND Correspondent="Huntington, Samuel" AND Correspondent="Washington, George"
sorted by: date (ascending)
Permanent link for this document:
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Washington/03-25-02-0118

From George Washington to Samuel Huntington, 26 March 1780

To Samuel Huntington

Head Qrs Morris Town March 26 1780

Sir

I beg leave to inform Congress, that from the importance of the subject and the difficulties we have experienced in our provision and Forage supplies, I have been induced in the course of a few days past, with the assistance of the Quarter Master General and the Commissary Generals of Provision & forage to make an Estimate of the quantity of each of these Articles, which would be necessary under our circumstances, for Thirty Thousand Men for Twelve Months. From a view of our past expenditures and supposing our means of transportation will be nearly the same they have been, it appears that Two Hundred Thousand Barrels of flour & Forty Millions of pounds of meat would be requisite to be provided—and a much greater quantity of Hay & Grain forage, as will be seen by the inclosed Estimate, than Congress have been pleased to require of the States, by their Resolution of the 25th of last month.1 I should have deemed a communication essential in the case of any specific requisition, which should have seemed too short in the supplies required, lest the States, after providing for the quantities called for, might have permitted the remaining the surplus of provisions to be exported, and from thence placed the subsistence of the Army on too precarious a footing. In the present one however, the communication appears the more essential, as, besides the inconvenience suggested & admitting it should never happen, the Act makes no certain provision for obtaining any Supplies beyond those required by it, although they should prove deficient. With all deference I would take the liberty to observe, that it appears to me, we cannot be too secure & guarded with respect to our supplies of provision & forage, as a failure in either would involve the most distressing consequences—and therefore that our requisitions should be full and ample in the first instance; and also, even where this is the case, that there should reside a power either in the Commissary General or in one or more persons appointed by Congress or in the Superintending agents to be nominated by the States to provide for contingencies. Upon the present occasion this power seems to me indispensible, as the Supplies requested by the Resolution of the 25th of February appear to be so materially deficient, and it may be absolutely necessary in many cases, both for the sake of public economy and because the Articles of supply may not be procurable elsewhere or at least not in due time or without great difficulty, to obtain large quantities of provision & Forage in a State, after it has actually furnished the quota required of it in the General Assessment. If this should not be allowable the public service may & will certainly suffer—and yet under the present arrangement of the business in this State, which, as I am informed, has undertaken to furnish it’s quota agreeable to the requisition, there is no provision which authorises it’s own Superintendent or Contractors to go farther than this, while the Law prohibits the Staff in the Continental line from purchasing any article of provision or Forage on public account, under a severe penalty; which System may be adopted by Others.2 With respect to the article of Hay for instance—the quantity heretofore purchased in this State, and which was essential for the army, has been more than double what is apportioned on it by the Act of the 25th of February; and should circumstances make as great an Expenditure material in future, and the State should be capable of affording a supply—the public interest would certainly require that it should be procured, in preference to drawing it from another, supposing it could be done. The propriety, and indeed necessity of the measure holds equally with respect to Other Articles and to every State. I do not mean to convey an Idea, that it is not necessary in our present circumstances to make specific requisitions of supplies in these instances, of the states; or that a System could be, or should be formed on any principle of apportionment—to oblige any One to furnish in this way—more than it’s proportion; but only that there should be a power somewhere, through which the public may avail themslves of the resources occasionally, of which each State may be capable. And indeed, as it may be unnecessa⟨ry⟩ and impossible in many instances to use th⟨e⟩ supplies apportioned on particular States, for the local operations of the Army—it seems [to] me, that there should be occasional sales of the articles laid up, particularly of Forage, whenever it shall appear from the circumstances of the War that they will not be wanted.

To the observations I have taken the liberty to make, I would beg leave to add, from the frequent occasions we are under, of bringing supplies from the Eastward, it appears essential that there should be a quantity of Hay provided in the Massachusetts’ State, probably about Two thousand Five Hundred Tons & from Two Thousand five hundred to Three Thousand Tons in Connecticut, as without a supply the Cattle employed in the business of transportation, will be supported with more difficulty & more expensively. The quantity called for from Rhode Island, from the present face of Military affairs, it seems probable will greatly exceed the Demand we shall have for it.

The Commissary General is of opinion, that it will be necessary for Nine Thousand Bushells of Salt to be deposited in Connecticut, more than is mentioned in the Resolution, as it is from thence that we must receive a great proportion of the Salt-provision he lays up; and likewise that he apprehends the quantity to be provided in the Southern States to [be] short by Five thousand Bushells. As the places from whence we draw supplies must depend on the abilities of the Individual States to afford them and on the local situation of the Army, it is difficult to frame any fixed and certain System in the case—and it will be found necessary according to these—I am persuaded in many instances, almost wholly to govern our conduct. For should we operate on the North River we must receive from the States of New York & Connecticut, infinitely greater quantities of Forage & flour than what are contained in the Act of requisition. I will only take the liberty to subjoin on this occasion, that the Quarter Master General—Commissary General and Forage Master General are now at philadelphia on business of their respective departments, and that they will be able, if it should be the pleasure of Congress—to satisfy them in many particulars with respect to the subjects of my Letters, and which cannot be so well detailed.3

The Estimate above is made on a number, which greatly exceeds that of our arm bearing Men; but it is considerably short of the Levies required by Congress including the force we at present have, and when we take into view the Officers, Staff, Artificers, the Numerous dependents on & connected with the Army—the Contingent and occasional Drafts of Militia we may stand in need of, it will be found to be sufficiently low.

There is another matter to which I would solicit the attention of Congress & could wish they would recommend it to the consideration of the States—It is their providing by some means, that Green pasturage may be had for the Horses of the Army on Marches and in Camp, before the season for dry Hay comes on, in some easy & summary way. The necessity of pasturage is evident & yet we have found great difficulty in obtaining it, and without the States take the matter up and make provision for it, I fear the service will suffer greatly, and that there will be besides constant complaints and Law-suits against the Officers in the Staff and other line of the Army. I have the Honor to be with the greatest respect & esteem Yr Excellency’s Most Obedt servt

Go: Washington

LS, in Robert Hanson Harrison’s writing, DNA:PCC, item 152; Df, DLC:GW; copy, DNA:PCC, item 169; Varick transcript, DLC:GW. Congress read GW’s letter on 29 March and referred it to a three-member committee, which consisted of Connecticut delegate Roger Sherman, North Carolina delegate Thomas Burke, and Pennsylvania delegate James Searle (JCC description begins Worthington Chauncey Ford et al., eds. Journals of the Continental Congress, 1774-1789. 34 vols. Washington, D.C., 1904–37. description ends , 16:313).

1The enclosure was a copy of undated memoranda in the writing of GW’s aide-de-camp Tench Tilghman calculating an “Estimate of Forage necessary for 19190 public Horses for an Army of 30,000 Infantry 4 Regiments and 2 Corps of Cavalry and 5 Regts of Artillery with Artificers—Staff &ca” (DNA:PCC, item 152). These horses were estimated to require per annum more than 43,777 tons of hay and over 1,751,087 bushels of grain. Even after deducting the use of “Green Forage,” there remained a projected need for more than 20,915 tons of hay and over 1,451,087 bushels of grain. A congressional resolution adopted on 25 Feb. requisitioned from the states 9,300 tons of hay and 694,814 bushels of grain, leaving a “Deficiency” of slightly more than 11,615 tons of hay and over 756,273 bushels of grain. For the congressional resolution, see JCC description begins Worthington Chauncey Ford et al., eds. Journals of the Continental Congress, 1774-1789. 34 vols. Washington, D.C., 1904–37. description ends , 16:196–201; see also Samuel Huntington to GW, 29 Feb., n.2, and Circular to the States, this date.

2GW is referring to legislation adopted on 18 March titled “A supplemental ACT to the Act, intitled, An Act for procuring Provisions for the Use of the Army, and other Supplies for carrying on the War; and for settling the publick Accounts of this State” (N.J. Acts 1779, second Sitting description begins Acts of the General Assembly of the State of New-Jersey, At a Session begun at Trenton on the 26th Day of October, 1779, and continued by Adjournments. Being the second Sitting of the fourth Assembly. Trenton, 1780. description ends , 69–73; see also Livingston to Joseph Reed, 1 March, in Prince, Livingston Papers description begins Carl E. Prince et al., eds. The Papers of William Livingston. 5 vols. Trenton and New Brunswick, N.J., 1979–88. description ends , 3:311).

3Ephraim Blaine, commissary general of purchases, wrote Huntington from Philadelphia on 29 March: “My duty to the Public require that I shou’d report to the Honorable the Congress, the State of Supplies as well at Head Quarters as in the Eastern States, the Provisions collected in Jersey in pursuance to the late Requisition of his Excellency General Washington, & the other Supplies collected are nearly expended, not a single Bullock now in Camp, & only Salt provisions equal to twelve Days remain’d in the Magazine there, the Magazine at Westpoint affords but a Temporary supply, & twenty five or thirty fat Cattle ⅌ Week will be wanting otherwise the Garrisson will certainly be distress’d in a short time . …

“The Magazines of Salt Provisions in the Eastern States very inconsiderable—the whole in the Middle Department with about four hundred head of Fat Cattle which I have had fed thro the Winter will about feed the Army with Meat up to the 10th of May, & if the Contracts my People have made for Flour are comply’d with (which I have reason to think the disappointment of Mon[e]y has induced some people to hold back) there will be sufficient of Flour & Indian Meal to serve the Army up to the middle of June. It therefore requires the speedy & serious attention of Congress to enable me to keep up the Supplies for the Army, the Laws of this State & New Jersey will prevent my former Deputies or Assistants from making any Contracts in future, & the pressing demands for Mon[e]y to fulfil those already made are numerous & in many cases really distressing.

“The Vicinity of this State, Delaware & Eastern Shore Maryland to the grand Army will require instant exertions from the new Commissioners to furnish the Quot[a]s required by Congress, on the speedy Collection & Delivery of which (I think) the very existance of our Army depends & the forwardg it to Camp is a matter of great importance” (DLC: Ephraim Blaine Letterbook; see also Circular to the New Jersey Magistrates, 7 Jan.). Congress read Blaine’s letter on 30 March and referred it to a three-member committee with directions “to confer with Mr. Blaine” (JCC description begins Worthington Chauncey Ford et al., eds. Journals of the Continental Congress, 1774-1789. 34 vols. Washington, D.C., 1904–37. description ends , 16:317).

For Q.M. Gen. Nathanael Greene’s imploring communications to Congress, see his letter to Jeremiah Wadsworth written on 2 April, found at Greene to GW, 31 March, n.7, and his letter to Huntington written on 3 April, found at Greene to GW, same date, n.2.

Clement Biddle, commissary general of forage, presumably communicated the troubles of his department to Congress, because he wrote Greene from Philadelphia on 7 April: “The supplies of Forage Could be continued for some time especialy in the Article of Grain if we could be Enabled to transport the same and on this in a great measure depends the Conveying the necessary supplies of Provisions for the Army which I am inform’d is now in great want and that the worst Consequences must ensue unless some immediate and effectual measures are taken to aid Transportation.

“I have in my department received the most Alarming Accounts from almost every district. …

“At [Head of] Elk the Vessels which bring up Forage from Virginia are detaind for want of money to pay their Freights . … In short from a total stop to the business of Transportation, we Can give the Army no support and it becomes my Duty to declare that I cannot answer for the defeciencies that we shall find and the bad Consequences that will follow unless I have a reasonable and immediate supply of money” (Greene Papers description begins Richard K. Showman et al., eds. The Papers of General Nathanael Greene. 13 vols. Chapel Hill, N.C., 1976–2005. description ends , 5:509–10).

Index Entries