1To Alexander Hamilton from Daniel Delozier, 3 September 1791 (Hamilton Papers)
It appears by the books and Invoices of this Office, that Mr Thomas Fraser imported in the Ship Hope, Andrew English, Master, from Liverpool the 23 June 1790 five Cases hats marked and numbered from 9 to 13 inclusive. Cases, number 9, 10, 11 & 12 were assorted alike and cost £26..9..3 sterling each, and number 13 cost £54. 13..9 Sterling. Mr. Fraser avers that in his acco. of packages...
2To Alexander Hamilton from Daniel Delozier, [11 October 1792] (Hamilton Papers)
[ Baltimore, October 11, 1792. On October 16, 1792, Hamilton wrote to Otho H. Williams : “Mr Delozier mentions in his letter of the 11th instant.” Letter not found. ] For background concerning this letter, see Williams to H, December 16, 1791 ; H to Williams, September 7, 1792 .
3To Alexander Hamilton from Daniel Delozier, 13 April 1794 (Hamilton Papers)
[ Baltimore, April 13, 1794. On May 1, 1794, Hamilton wrote to Delozier : “I duly received your letter of the 13th of April.” Letter not found. ] Delozier was inspector of the revenue for the port of Baltimore and surveyor for the District of Baltimore.
4To Alexander Hamilton from Daniel Delozier, 15 April 1794 (Hamilton Papers)
[ Baltimore, April 15, 1794. On May 2, 1794, Hamilton wrote to Delozier : “I received your letter of the 15th ultimo.” Letter not found. ]
5From Alexander Hamilton to Daniel Delozier, 1 May 1794 (Hamilton Papers)
I duly received your letter of the 13th of April containing an extract of a Letter from General Williams to you. When any instructions are addressed to the Collector and he is not in a condition to execute it personally on account of absence or sickness, it is understood that the person who acts in his stead as Collector will take up the business and execute it. I request that this idea may be...
6From Alexander Hamilton to Daniel Delozier, 2 May 1794 (Hamilton Papers)
I received your letter of the 15th ultimo with sundry communications relatively to the Revenue Cutter. The rate of 2/2d per man proposed by Captn Porter in his letter of the 5th. of April is excessive beyond toleration & it appears to me from the nature of the case and what exists in every other port that it is impossible that rate can be a reasonable one for a reasonable supply of the seamen....