Adams Papers
Documents filtered by: Author="Willink, Van Staphorst, and De la Lande & Fynje"
sorted by: date (ascending)
Permanent link for this document:
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Adams/06-16-02-0045

Wilhem & Jan Willink, Nicolaas & Jacob van Staphorst, and De la Lande & Fynje to John Adams, 4 March 1784

From Wilhem & Jan Willink, Nicolaas & Jacob
van Staphorst, and De la Lande & Fynje

Amsterdam 4 March 1784.

Sir

We take the Liberty of sending herewith the General Bond of the new Loan with the Dutch Translation of it, and beg you’ll be so kind as to pass this Act before an English Notary in the Hague and to send us the Gross together with the Dutch Translation as soon as possible back.1 It will be necessary also to make different Copies to send ’em to Congress for its Ratification. Your Excellency will observe we have made the Form of the Bond in such a Manner that your Excellency might be saved the Trouble of signing all the Copies, as was before done, the which Alteration will we hope be acceptable to your Excellency.2

The Loan goes tolerably well. We have already collected almost as much Money as is sufficient to pay the Bills, which are now due, and we have some good Expectations that we shall be able in a short Time to accept also the remaining Drafts of Mr Morris.

We have the Honor to remain with due Respect / Sir / Your Excellency’s / Most humble and obedt Servts.

Wilhem & Jan Willink
Nics. & Jacob van Staphorst
de la Lande & fynje

RC (Adams Papers).

1That is, the consortium was enclosing English and Dutch language versions of the loan contract. JA was to return the engrossed (grosse in Dutch), notarized copies of the contract. See the notarized English version of the contract for the second Dutch loan at 9 March, the day on which it was notarized, below. The engrossed Dutch copy has not been found.

2That is, the contract provided that the obligations for the loan could be sold over the signature of the consortium’s members. For the provision in the first Dutch loan of [11 June 1782] requiring JA’s signature on the obligations, see vol. 13:112.

Index Entries