Thomas Jefferson Papers
Documents filtered by: Author="Madison, James" AND Recipient="Jefferson, Thomas"
sorted by: recipient
Permanent link for this document:
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jefferson/03-05-02-0260

James Madison to Thomas Jefferson, 17 August 1812

From James Madison

Washington Aug. 17. 1812.

Dear Sir

I have recd yours of the 10th and return as you request, the letter of Mr Higginbotham. He will probably have understood from Col: Monroe that the Consulate of Lisbon is the object of numerous & respectable candidates.

The seditious opposition in Mass. & Cont with the intrigues elsewhere insidiously co-operating with it, have so clogged the wheels of the war, that I fear the campaign will not accomplish the object of it. With the most united efforts in stimulating volunteers, they would have probably fallen much short of the number required by the deficiency of regular enlistments. But under the discouragements substituted, and the little attraction contained in the volunteer act, the two classes together, leave us dependent, for every primary operation, on militia, either as volunteers or draughts for six months. We are nevertheless doing as well1 as we can, in securing the maritime frontier, and in providing for an effective penetration into upper Canada. It would probably have been best, if it had been practicable in time, to have concentrated a force which could have seized on Montreal & then at one stroke, have secured the upper Province, and cut off the sap that nourished Indian hostilities. But this could not be attempted, without sacrificing the Western & N. W. Frontier, threated with inundation of savages under the influence of the British establishment near Detroit. Another reason for the expedition of Hull was that the unanimity and ardor of Kentucky & Ohio, promised the requisite force at once for that service, whilst it was too distant from the other points to be assailed. We just learn, but from what cause2 remains to be known, that the important post at Machilimackinac has fallen into the hands of the Enemy. If the re-inforcement of about 2000 ordered from the Ohio, and on the way to Hull, should not enable him to take Malden, and awe the Savages emboldened by the British success, his situation will be very ineligible. It is hoped that he will either be strong eno’, as he has cannon & mortars, to reduce that Fort, or to have a force that will justify him in passing on towards the other end of Lake Erie, and place the British troops there, between him, and those embodied under arrangements of Dearborn & Tomkins at Niagara, for the purpose of occupying the central part of Upper Canada. In the mean time the preparations agst Montreal are going on, and perhaps may furnish a feint towards it, that may conspire with the other plan. I find that Kingston at the East End of L. Ontario is an object with Genl D. The multiplication of these offensive measures have grown out of the defensive precautions for the Frontier of N. York.

We have no information from England since the war was known there, or even, seriously suspected, by the public. I think it not improbable that the sudden change in relation to the O.3 in Council, first in yielding to a qualified suspension, & then a repeal, was the effect of apprehensions in the Cabinet that the deliberations of Cong: would have that issue, and that the Ministry could not stand agst the popular torrent agst the Orders in Council, swelled as it would be by the addition of a war with the U.S. to the pressure of the non-importation act. What course will be taken, when the declaration here, shall be known, is uncertain, both in reference to the American shipments instituted under the repeal of the Orders, and to the question between,4 vindictive efforts for pushing the war agst us, and early advances for terminating it. A very informal, & as it has turned out erronious communication of the intended change in the Orders, was hurried over, evidently with a view to prevent a declaration of war, if it should arrive in time. And the communication was accompanied by a proposal from the local authorities at Halifax sanctioned by Foster, to suspend hostilities both at sea & on land. The late message of Prevost to Dearborn, noticed in the newspapers has this for its object. The insuperable objections to a concurrence of the Executive in the project are obvious. Without alluding to others, drawn from a limited authority, & from the effect on patriotic ardor,5 the advantage over us in captures, wd be past, before it could take effect. As we do not apprehend invasion by land, and preparations on each side were to be unrestrained, nothing could be gained by us, whilst arrangements & reenforcements adverse to Hull, might be decisive; and on every supposition, the Indians wd6 continue to be active agst our frontiers, the more so in consequence of the fall of Machilimackinac. Nothing but triumphant operations on the Theatre which forms their connection with the Enemy, will controul their bloody inroads.

I have been indulging hopes of getting away from this place, in the course of this present week. It is quite possible however that my stay here may be indispensible. As yet I have less of bilious sensations than I could have expected.

Your two letters to Kosciuzco have been duly attended to. Affectionately yours

James Madison

RC (DLC: Madison Papers); endorsed by TJ as received 19 Aug. 1812 and so recorded in SJL. For enclosure, see note to TJ to Madison, 10 Aug. 1812 (second letter).

Volunteers from kentucky & ohio were ordered to reinforce General William Hull on 22 June 1812. British forces aided by almost a thousand Indian warriors captured the post at Michilimackinac (machilimackinac) on 17 July (Madison, Papers description begins William T. Hutchinson, Robert A. Rutland, John C. A. Stagg, and others, eds., The Papers of James Madison, 1962– , 31 vols.  Congress. Ser., 17 vols.  Pres. Ser., 6 vols.  Sec. of State Ser., 8 vols description ends , Pres. Ser., 5:129, 130n, 152n). Fort malden, located at Amherstburg along the Detroit River in Upper Canada, defended a British navy yard and a strategically important locus of trade and traffic. News of an armistice proposal by Sir George prevost, governor in chief of British North America, appeared in the Baltimore American and Commercial Daily Advertiser, 17 Aug. 1812, and other newspapers.

1Manuscript: “will.”

2Word interlined.

3At a later date Madison expanded this to “Orders.”

4Word interlined in place of what appears to be “whether.”

5Sentence to this point interlined.

6Word interlined.

Index Entries

  • Army, U.S.; volunteer act search
  • Canada; Upper search
  • Dearborn, Henry; and N.Y. campaign search
  • Fort Malden (Upper Canada) search
  • Foster, Augustus John; and armistice proposals search
  • Great Britain; J. Madison on war with search
  • Great Britain; Orders in Council (1807) search
  • Higginbotham, David; seeks consulship at Lisbon search
  • Hull, William; J. Madison on search
  • Indians; as British allies search
  • Kentucky; troops from search
  • Kingston, Upper Canada search
  • Kosciuszko, Tadeusz (Thaddeus) Andrzej Bonawentura; letters delivered to search
  • Lisbon; U.S. consulship at search
  • Madison, James; and appointments search
  • Madison, James; and war with Great Britain search
  • Madison, James; letters from search
  • Michigan Territory; and War of1812 search
  • Michilimackinac (Mich. Territory); surrender at search
  • Monroe, James; as secretary of state search
  • Montreal search
  • Non-Intercourse Act; reimposed on Great Britain search
  • Ohio; troops from search
  • Prevost, George; governor-in-chief of British North America search
  • Tompkins, Daniel D.; governor of N.Y. search
  • Virginia; volunteer troops from search