You
have
selected

  • Author

    • Jay, Peter

Recipient

Sort: Frequency / Alphabetical

Show: Top 4

Period

Dates From

Dates To

Search help
Documents filtered by: Author="Jay, Peter"
Results 1-10 of 15 sorted by date (ascending)
  • |<
  • <<
  • <
  • Page 1
  • >
  • >>
  • >|
No. Author Recipient Title Date Context
1 Jay, Peter Peloquin, David Peter Jay to David Peloquin, 16 May 1762 1762-05-16 I had the honour of writing to you the 12 Decemb: & 6 feb. last, and have since received your...
2 Jay, Peter Jay, John To John Jay from Peter Jay, early 1763 ≈1763-01-01 You may read my Letter that covers this, to your Aunts Depeyster & Chambers, to prevent any...
3 Jay, Peter Jay, James Peter Jay to James Jay, 15 February 1763 1763-02-15 My last was the 15 ult o ., and have since received your letters of the 30 Sept., 5 Octob: & 6...
4 Jay, Peter Jay, James Peter Jay to James Jay, 14 April 1763 1763-04-14 Since my last of the 15 th . Feb:, I have received your Letters of the 28 Nov r & 8 January— the...
5 Jay, Peter Peloquin, David Peter Jay to David Peloquin, 14 April 1763 1763-04-14 My last was the 15 th February and I have now before me your kind favours of the 18 th . Novemb r...
6 Jay, Peter Jay, John To John Jay from Peter Jay, 9 August 1763 1763-08-09 it’s very long since I’ve recd: any Letters from you. I recd: last Post a Letter from Doctr:...
7 Jay, Peter Jay, John To John Jay from Peter Jay, 23 August 1763 1763-08-23 Your Letter and Box p r . Barker is received—y r Letter p r . Alley was deliver’d me since Fady...
8 Jay, Peter Peloquin, David Peter Jay to David Peloquin, 15 November 1763 1763-11-15 Your kind favours of the 26 July 6 & 10 Aug t together with the Magazines are come to hand by...
9 Jay, Peter Jay, John To John Jay from Peter Jay, 16 January 1764 1764-01-16 Your letter and the Boy were immediately sent to M r . Punderson, who I’ve not seen since but am...
10 Jay, Peter Jay, John To John Jay from Peter Jay, 28 February 1764 1764-02-28 I have recd: your Letter of last Friday.— I’m of your oppinion that M r . Ernest’s Terms are too...