John Jay Papers
Documents filtered by: Author="Jay, John" AND Period="Adams Presidency"
sorted by: date (descending)
Permanent link for this document:
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jay/01-07-02-0052

From John Jay to Theophilus Parsons, 1 July 1800

To Theophilus Parsons

Albany 1 July 1800

Sir

On my Return from New York; on Friday last, your obliging [letter of] the 5th. of May,1 which arrived here during my absence, was delivered to me. [I am] much gratified by the Information it contains, & thank you for it.—[Serio]us apprehensions were entertained that antifœderalism had [gained] considerable Ground in Massachusetts; but I am happy to find [from the] Facts you state, that appearances do not warrant the conclusions [which have] been drawn from them.—

[The] present aspect of our affairs is far from being agreable— Altho’ [peculiarly] blessed, and having abundant Reason for Content & Gratitude, [our nation] is permitting their Happiness to be put in Jeopardy by the [worst] passions inflamed and directed by the most reprehensible means. [Whether] the good Sense of the People will avert the Dangers which threaten [them] is yet to be seen— If the sound and leading Friends of their [count]ry could concur in opinion as to men and measures, their Efforts [would] probably be successful— but unfortunately there is too little [unani]mity in many points, and the want of it exposes us to the [hazard] of many Evils—

It really appears to me that the mission of our Envoys to France, [has] been treated with too much asperity. The President declared to the Cong[ress], that he would never send another Legation to Paris, untill he r[ecd.] assurances that it would be properly respected. As that [declaration seemed to imply that when he should recieve such [assur]ances, he would again send Envoys, it was not unnatural [that] he should concieve himself bound in Honor to do so. His [atta]chment to the Dictates of Honor and good Faith, even supposing it [to h]ave been too scrupulous, is amiable and praiseworthy—Whether that Declaration was advisable, and whether the [nomination of the] Envoys was made exactly in Season, are questions which[, like oth]ers of the same kind, may recieve different answers from [different] men. But having nominated the Envoys and recieved [the] requisite assurances, I for my part consider the sending [them] as a matter of Course; and do not concur in opinion with [those] Gentlemen, who think they should nevertheless have be[en] detained—2

I regret that my absence deprived me of the pleasure of seeing the Revd. Mr. Andrews—3 and the more so, as he would [have] answered my Inquiries respecting many of my friends [at] Boston, and informed me of your Health— With the best wishes that you may now and [long] enjoy that valuable Blessing I am Sir your most obt. Servt.

John Jay

Theops. Parsons Esqr.

ALS, PC (EJ: 13405). Dft, NNC (EJ: 09007); WJ, 2: 295–96; HPJ, 4: 274–75.

2For more on JJ’s views regarding the American envoys in France, see the editorial note “John Jay and the Response to the XYZ Affair in New York,” JJSP description begins Elizabeth M. Nuxoll et al., eds., The Selected Papers of John Jay (6 vols. to date; Charlottesville, Va., 2010–) description ends , 6: 655–60.

3John Andrews of Newburyport. See Parsons to JJ, 5 May 1800, note 1, above.

Index Entries