John Jay Papers
Documents filtered by: Author="Jay, John" AND Period="Confederation Period"
sorted by: author
Permanent link for this document:
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jay/01-04-02-0179

Report on Negotiations with Gardoqui, 3 August 1786

Report on Negotiations with Gardoqui

[N York 3 Augt. 1786]1

Sir

Every Person to whom ^is committed^ the Management of a Negociation, from which many good or ill Consequences will probably result, must find himself placed in a very delicate and responsible Situation. In that Point of Light I consider our present Negociations with Spain, and that my Sentiments on the Subject may be conveyed to Congress with Precision, and authentic Evidence of them preserved, I have reduced them to Writing as concisely and accurately as I could find Leisure to do since I received notice to attend this Day.—

It appears to me that a proper commercial Treaty with Spain, would be of more Importance to the United States, than any they have formed, or can form with any other Nation. I am led to entertain this Opinion from the Influence which Spain may, and will have, both on our Politics and our Commerce.—2

France whom we consider as our Ally, and to whom we shall naturally turn our Eyes for Aid in case of War &c: is strongly bound to Spain by the family Compact; and the Advantages she derives from it are so various and so great, that it is questionable whether she could even remain neuter in Case of a Rupture between us and his Catholic Majesty: Besides, we are well apprized of the Sentiments of France relative to our western Claims; in which I include that of freely navigating the River Missisipi. I take it for granted that while the Compact in Question exists, France will invariably think it her Interest to prefer the good Will of Spain to the good Will of America, and altho’ she would very reluctantly give Umbrage to either, yet if driven to take Part with one or the other, I think it would not be in our Favor. Unless we are Friends with Spain, her Influence whether more or less, on the Counsels of Versailles, will always be against us.—3

The Intermarriages between Spain and Portugal which have taken place in this and the late Reigns, have given the former a Degree of Influence at the Court of the latter, which she never before possessed; and leading Men in both those Kingdoms, seem disposed to bury former Jealousies and Apprehensions in mutual Confidence and good Offices. How far this System may be perfected, or how long continue, is uncertain; while it lasts, we must expect Good or Evil from it, according as we stand well or ill with Spain.—4

Britain would be rejoiced to find us at Variance with Spain on any Points—she remembers that we were once her Subjects, and loves us not—she perceives that we are her most important Rivals in the Spanish Trade, and that her Nursery of Seamen on the Banks of Newfoundland, will prosper or otherwise as ours of the like kind shall encrease or diminish; and it will encrease or diminish in Proportion as we may or may not undersell them at foreign Markets, among which that of Spain is the most advantageous.—

If Spain should be disposed to sink that Scale in Favor of Britain, there is little Reason to doubt but that the latter will offer her powerful Inducements to grant and perpetuate valuable Preferences to her.—

It is hard to say how far these Inducements may extend, or how far they might both think it their Interest to join in every Measure tending to impair our Strength, and thereby quiet those Fears with which uneasy Borderers and discontented Neighbours, usually inspire each other.—

Recent Transactions tell us that the Influence of Spain in Barbary is not contemptible. When Time shall have cast a thicker Veil over the Memory of past and long continued Hostilities—when the Convenience of Spanish Money and Spanish Favors shall become better known and more felt at Fez, Algiers &c: it is more than probable that those Powers will be little inclined to disoblige a Nation, whose Arms have given them much Trouble, and from whose Gratuities they derive more Wealth and Advantages than they have ever been able to reap from Depredations, and from Plunder often hardly gained.—

The Influence which the Catholic King will and must have, in greater of lesser Degrees in Italy, with several of whose Sovereigns he is allied by Blood as well as by Treaties, merits some Consideration. The Trade of the Mediterranean deserves our Notice, and Spain has convenient Ports in that Sea.—5

In various Ways therefore may Spain promote or oppose our political Interests with several other Countries—and we shall I think either find her in America a very convenient Neighbour, or a very troublesome one.—

They who are acquainted with the Commerce of that Country, can be at no Loss in perceiving or estimating its Value.—

It is well known that they consume more than they export, and consequently that the Balance of Trade is and must be against them—hence it is that the Millions they yearly bring from the Mines of America, so soon disappear, flying out of Spain by every Road and Port in it.—

Details would be tedious, and considering where I am, unnecessary—it is sufficient to observe, that there is scarcely a single Production of this Country but what may be advantageously exchanged in the Spanish European Ports for Gold and Silver. These Advantages however must depend on a Treaty—for Spain like other Nations, may admit Foreigners to trade with her or not, and on such terms only, as she may think proper.—

The Conclusion I draw from what has been said is, that on general Principles of Policy and Commerce, it is the Interest of the United States to be on the best Terms with Spain. This Conclusion would be greatly strengthened by a Review of our present local and other Circumstances—but they are well known, and their Language is strong and intelligible.—

Sir, I do really believe that Spain is at present sincerely disposed to make Friends of us—I believe this, not because they have repeatedly told us so—for in my Opinion little Reliance is to be made on the Professions of Courts or Courtiers—they will say what they may think convenient, but they will act according to what they may think their Interest.—

It appears to me that the Independence, Situation, Temper, Resources and other Circumstances of the United States, lead the Court of Spain to regard them with much Attention, & I may add, with Jealousy and Apprehension.—

Their Conduct induces me to think that their present Policy and Design is, to cultivate our Friendship, and ensure the Continuance of it, by such Advantages in a Treaty, as may prevent its becoming our Interest to break with them.6

To this Cause I ascribe the Civilities shewn to the United States, by the Release of their Citizens at the Havanna,7 and by the Interposition of his Catholic Majesty in their Favor at Morocco &c:—

To the same Cause I ascribe the very liberal and beneficial Articles which their Plenipotentiary here is willing to have inserted in the Treaty I am now negociating with him, and which are specified in the following Notes of them Vizt.—

1. That all commercial Regulations affecting each other shall be founded in perfect Reciprocity. Spanish Merchants shall enjoy all the commercial Privileges of native Merchants in the United States; and American Merchants shall enjoy all the commercial Privileges of native Merchants in the Kingdom of Spain and in the Canaries and other Islands belonging and adjacent thereto. The same Privileges shall extend to their respective Vessels, and Merchandize consisting of the Manufactures and Productions of their respective Countries.—

2. Each Party may establish Consuls in the Countries of the other (excepting such Provinces in Spain, into which none have heretofore been admitted, Vizt. Bilboa and Guipusca) with such Powers and Privileges as shall be ascertained by a particular Convention.—

3. That the bona fide Manufactures and Productions of the United States (Tobacco only excepted, which shall continue under its present Regulations) may be imported in American or Spanish Vessels, into any Parts of his Majesty’s European Dominions and Islands aforesaid in like Manner as if they were the Productions of Spain. And on the other Hand, that the bona fide Manufactures and Productions of his Majesty’s Dominions may be imported into the United States, in spanish or american Vessels in like Manner as if they were the Manufactures and Productions of the said States. And further that all such Duties and Imposts as may mutually be thought necessary to lay on them, by either Party, shall be ascertained and regulated on Principles of exact Reciprocity, by a Tariff to be formed by a Convention for that Purpose to be negociated and made, within one Year after the Exchange of the Ratification of this Treaty; and in the mean Time, that no other Duties or Imposts shall be exacted from each others Merchants and Ships, than such as many be payable by Natives in like Cases.

4. That inasmuch as the United States, from not having, Mines of Gold and Silver, may often want Supplies of Specie for a circulating Medium, his Catholic Majesty as a Proof of his good Will, agrees to order the Masts & Timber which may from time to time be wanted for his royal Navy, to be purchased, and paid for in Specie, in the United States Provided the said Masts & Timber shall be of equal Quality, and when brought to Spain, shall not cost more than the like may there be had from other Countries.—

5. It is agreed that the Articles commonly inserted in other Treaties of Commerce for mutual and reciprocal Convenience shall be inserted in this, and that this Treaty and every Article and Stipulation therein shall continue in full Force for  8 Years to be computed from the Day of the Date thereof.—

These Articles need no Comment—It is easy to perceive that by them we gain much, and sacrifice or give up nothing. They will not indeed permit our Tobacco to be vended in their Country—but that Prohibition now exists, and will probably continue, whether we do or do not make a Treaty with Spain.—

It is also certain that by Means of the Canaries, our Flour and other Commodities will find the Way to Spanish America; and the Supply of that Market even by a circuitous Route, cannot fail of affording a very lucrative Vent for those Articles.—9

Mr. Gardoqui is not personally averse to our visiting the Phillipines, but his Instructions do not reach that Point.—

I have Hopes that this may be carried, and in that Case it is obvious we should be the better for the Acapulco Trade.—10

I forbear to dwell minutely on these commercial Subjects, because nothing I could say respecting them would be new.—

My Attention is chiefly fixed on two Obstacles which at present divide us Vizt. the Navigation of the Missisippi and the territorial Limits between them & us.

My Letters written from Spain, when our Affairs were the least promising, evince my Opinion respecting the Missisippi, and oppose every Idea of relinquishing our Right to navigate it. I entertain the same Sentiments of that Right, and of the Importance of retaining it, which I then did.—11

Mr. Gardoqui strongly insists on our relinquishing it. We have had many Conferences and much Reasoning on the Subject, not necessary now to detail—His concluding Answer to all my Arguments has steadily been, that the King will never yield that Point, nor consent to any Compromise about it—for that it always has been and continues to be one of their Maxims of Policy, to exclude all Mankind from their American Shores.—

I have often reminded him that the adjacent Country was filling fast with People, and that the Time must and would come, when they would not submit to seeing a fine River flow before their Doors without using it as a Highway to the Sea for the Transportation of their Productions—that it would therefore be wise to look forward to that Event, and take Care not to sow in the Treaty any Seeds of future Discord—He said that the Time alluded to was far distant, and that Treaties were not to provide for Contingencies so remote and future—for his Part he considered the rapid Settlement of that Country as injurious to the States, and that they would find it necessary to check it. Many fruitless Arguments passed between us, and tho’ he would admit that the only way to make Treaties and Friendship permanent, was for neither Party to leave the other any Thing to complain of; yet he would still insist, that the Missisippi must be shut against us. The truth is, that Courts never admit the Force of any Reasoning or Arguments but such as apply in their Favor; and it is equally true, that even if our Right to that Navigation, or to any Thing else, was expressly declared in Holy Writ, we should be able to provide for the Enjoyment of it no otherwise than by being in Capacity to repel force by force.—

Circumstanced as we are, I think it would be expedient to agree that the Treaty should be limited to twenty five or thirty Years, and that one of the Articles should stipulate that the United States would forbear to use the Navigation of that River below their Territories to the Ocean. Thus the Duration of the Treaty and of the Forbearance in Question, would be limited to the same Periods.—

Whether Mr. Gardoqui would be content with such an Article I cannot determine, my Instructions restraining me from even sounding him respecting it—I nevertheless think the Experiment worth trying for several Reasons—

  • 1. Because unless that Matter can in some way or other be settled, the Treaty however advantageous will not be concluded.—
  • 2. As that Navigation is not at present important, nor will probably become much so, in less than twenty five or thirty Years, a Forbearance to use it while we do not want it, is no great Sacrifice.—
  • 3. Spain now excludes us from that Navigation, and with a strong Hand holds it against us—she will not yield it peaceably, and therefore we can only acquire it by War—now as we are not prepared for a War with any Power, as many of the States would be little inclined to a War with Spain for that Object, at this Day; and as such a War would for those and a variety of obvious Reasons be inexpedient, it follows, that Spain will for a long Space of Time yet to come exclude us from that Navigation. Why therefore should we not (for a valuable Consideration too) consent to forbear to use, what we know is not in our Power to use.—
  • 4. If Spain and the United States should part on this Point—what are the latter to do? Will it after that be consistent with their Dignity to permit Spain forceably to exclude them from a Right, which at the Expense of a beneficial Treaty, they have asserted? They will find themselves obliged either to do this and be humiliated, or they must attack Spain. Are they ripe and prepared for this? I wish I could say they are.—

It is possible that such an Article if agreed to might lessen one of the Arguments urged to enhance the Value of western Lands: but would not the Spaniards continuing by Force to exclude us from the Navigation, soon have the same Effect? In either Case that Argument must lose some of its Force, but in the one Case America would also lose some of its Dignity—it can be no Question therefore which of the two Cases would be least desirable.—

If such a Compromise should be attempted and not succeed, we shall lose nothing by it—for they who take a Lease admit the Right of the Lessor.—

I have some Hope that it would succeed, for I suspect Spain would argue that as we are tempted to this Forbearance now by other Articles in the Treaty, the like Temptations will again induce us to prolong it—besides I much doubt whether the Minister extends his Views far beyond the Limits of his own Life or Administration—if he can render that easy and satisfactory, he may perhaps without much Reluctance, leave future Disputes to be settled by future Ministers. It is hard to say whether this will or will not be the Case—I am for trying the Experiment, because it can in my Opinion do us no Injury and may produce much Good.—

With respect to territorial Limits, it is clear to me, that Spain can justly claim nothing East of the Missisippi but what may be comprehended within the Bounds of the Floridas. How far those Bounds extend, or ought to extend, may prove a Question of more Difficulty to negociate than to decide. Pains I think should be taken to conciliate and settle all such Matters amicably, and it would be better even to yield a few Acres, than to part in ill Humour. If their Demands when ascertained, should prove too extravagant, and too pertinaciously adhered to, one Mode of avoiding a Rupture will still be left Vizt. referring that Dispute to impartial Commissioners. I do not mean by this, that any third Sovereign should be called in to mediate or arbitrate about the Matter—They make troublesome Arbitrators, and not always the most impartial—I mean private Men for Commissioners—and to me there appears little Difficulty in finding proper ones—for not being prepared for War, I think it much our Interest to avoid placing ourselves in such a Situation, as that our forbearing Hostilities may expose us to Indignities.—

It is much to be wished that all these Matters had lain dormant for Years yet to come—but such Wishes are vain—these Disputes are agitating—they press themselves upon us, and must terminate in Accommodation, or War, or Disgrace. The last is the worst that can happen, the second we are unprepared for, and therefore our Attention and Endeavours should be bent to the first.—

Permit me, Sir, to make one or two Observations more. If the System of Spain respecting us, really is, what I suppose it to be, then it follows that this is the best Season for making a Treaty with her that can be expected.

The late War has left her new commercial Engagements to make, particularly with Britain, whose Attention to Commerce leaves us no Room to suppose her indifferent to that with Spain—She is now able & willing to grant us Favors—other Treaties and other Dispositions and Views may render her in future both unable and unwilling to do the like.—

At a Time when other Nations are shewing us no extraordinary Marks of Respect; the Court of Spain is even courting our Friendship by strong Marks not merely of polite and friendly Attention, but by offering us Favors not common for her to hold out or bestow—for I consider the Terms she proposes as far more advantageous than any to be found in her commercial Treaties with other Nations—

If after all her Endeavours to take us by the Hand, we should hold it back, every Disposition and Passion opposite to kind and friendly ones, will undoubtedly influence her future Conduct. Disappointed in her Views, and mortified by Repulse, and that in the Sight of Europe, we may easily judge what her Feelings would be—nor is it difficult to forsee that those Feelings stimulated by the Jealousies and Apprehensions beforementioned, will naturally precipitate and keep her in a System of Politics, from which the United States cannot expect to derive Advantage.—

The Missisippi would continue shut—France would tell us our Claim to it was ill-founded—the Spanish Posts on its Banks, and even those out of Florida in our Country, would be strengthened, and that Nation would there bid us Defiance with Impunity—at least until the American Nation shall become more really and truly a Nation than it at present is. For unblessed with an efficient Government, destitute of Funds and without public Credit either at Home or abroad, we should be obliged to wait in Patience for better Days, or plunge into an unpopular and dangerous War, with very little Prospect of terminating it by a Peace either advantageous or glorious. Supposing this Spanish Business out of Question, yet the Situation of the United States appears to me to be seriously delicate and to call for great Circumspection both at Home and abroad—nor in my Opinion will this cease to be the Case, until a vigorous national Government be formed and public Credit and Confidence established.—

These, Sir, are my Sentiments on these important Subjects: and whether they accord with, or vary from those which may here prevail, yet I shall always remember that I am to be governed by the Instructions, and that it is my Duty faithfully to execute the Orders of Congress.

John Jay

DS, DNA: PCC, item 81, 2: 193–211 (EJ: 3913). Endorsed: “Speech of Secretary for / Foreign Affairs Aug. 3. 1786”. C, Secret Foreign Journal, DNA: PCC, item 5, 3: 1131–50. LbkCs, DNA: PCC, item 124, 2: 167–85; DNA: PCC, item 125, 40–56 (EJ: 3707). Es, DLC: Jefferson (EJ: 10102); TxAuHRH (EJ: 63). JCC, description begins Worthington C. Ford et al., eds., Journals of the Continental Congress, 1774–1789 (34 vols.; Washington, D.C., 1904–37) description ends 31: 467–84.

1In the Secret Foreign Journal (DNA: PCC, item 5, 3: 1131) this report is preceded by the following in the hand of CT:

“According to Order the Secretary for foreign Affairs attended & being called upon to state the difficulties mentioned in his letter of the 29 & explain himself on the subject of that letter.

The Secretary ^for foreign Affairs^ informed Congress that he had some time since received from Mr Gardoqui an unofficial & unsigned paper & afterwards a letter, dated 25 May 1786, which he laid before Congress & the same being read He then delivered himself as follows:”

See also OFA Journal description begins Daily Journals, Office of Foreign Affairs, 1784–1790, 2 vols., Papers of the Continental Congress, RG 360, item 127, National Archives (M247). Accessed Fold3.com. description ends , entry for 3 Aug. 1786 (EJ: 3766); and Gardoqui to JJ, 25 May 1786, above.

In the Secret Foreign Journal (DNA: PCC, item 5, 3: 1131–32) the text of the unofficial, unsigned, and undated note from Gardoqui is presented as follows:

“Spain being by far the greatest Consumer of all the European Kingdoms, and having besides extensive territories of Consume in her West Indies, it is of course of the greatest importance to any foreign nation in all Commercial interests—

England is very conscious of the advantages that may be gott by a friendly Commercial treaty, and leaves no pains to bring it to a happy conclusion as soon as possible.—She well knows that Spain’s annual consume of Cod-fish, brings her in from 4 to 5 Millions of dollars, by which she employs between 5 or 6000 Seamen.

That great quantities of pickled Salmon and Train Oil are besides pouring annually into the Spanish Markets from her ports.

To this must be added, her great woolen Manufactures, but as Spain is advancing fast in the latter, and will probably stop the importation of them, England wants to secure the fisheries which sees no prospect of Spain’s having any at all—

Under the above principles, England exerts to the utmost to prevent that American States should come to a friendly good understanding with Spain, fully assur’d that no other Nation can outrival them in the valuable branches of fisheries—

She well knows that the local situation of the United States and other advantages render a much better fish than that of Newfoundland, and that the Spanish Markets afford 1 to 1½ dollars per quintal more to the former. She is besides, fully persuaded that the trade of the States with Spain must rise them amazingly, as their Flour, grain, rice, Tobacco and several other smaller Articles, such as Lumber, Masts, Yards, Bees wax &c: are valuable.—If it be added to this, the consideration that Spain and the States, are the almost only Masters of this vast Continent, who if well join’d may defy the other powers or at least keep them in eternal peace, there can be no doubt of it’s being a mutual interest—“

Another copy of Gardoqui’s undated note appears in DNA: PCC, item 124, 2: 198–200.

2JM responded to JJ’s claim that Spain exercised considerable weight in international affairs by arguing that the United States would be offering precious sacrifices to an impotent nation, made unfit by its government and religion, in return for an exchange of commercial privileges that favored Spain and not the United States. See PJM, description begins William T. Hutchinson, William M. E. Rachal, Robert A. Rutland et al., eds., The Papers of James Madison, Congressional Series (17 vols.; Chicago and Charlottesville, Va., 1962–91) description ends 9: 82–83.

3A letter from the President of Congress to JJ of 17 Oct. 1780, drafted by JM to provide arguments to strengthen its claim to navigate the Mississippi and to the territory east of it, argued that France had guaranteed the United States’ possessions effective the moment France entered the war under Articles 11 and 12 of the treaty of 1778. In his responses, JJ had informed Congress that he suspected that the French did not consider that the treaty guarantee covered these American claims. His suspicions were reinforced when he met with Rayneval in Paris in 1782. See JJSP, description begins Elizabeth M. Nuxoll et al., eds., The Selected Papers of John Jay (3 vols. to date; Charlottesville, Va., 2010—) description ends 2: 306–7, 438; 3: 102–8, 237–45, 247.

JJ’s replies led Congress to order him to report immediately any information he had on France’s position on the matter and to state Spain’s claims to the lands east of the river. JJ replied that it would be “rash” for him to respond from memory, but that he would address the matter immediately and transmit his report as soon as it was finished. See his report of 17 Aug., below, which Congress read on 22 Aug.; JCC, description begins Worthington C. Ford et al., eds., Journals of the Continental Congress, 1774–1789 (34 vols.; Washington, D.C., 1904–37) description ends 31: 509–10, 537–52; CT to JJ, 10 Aug. 1786, C, DNA: PCC, item 125, 56 (EJ: 3708); LDC, description begins Paul H. Smith et al., eds., Letters of Delegates to the Continental Congress, 1774–1789 (26 vols.; Washington, D.C., 1976–98) description ends 23: 460; and JJ to the President of Congress, 10 Aug. 1786, C, DNA: PCC, item 125, 57–58 (EJ: 3709).

4Fernando VI of Spain (1746–59) married Barbara de Bragança of Portugal. Prince Gabriel (1752–88), whom Charles III had considered designating as his heir, married Infanta Mariana Vitoria of Portugal in April 1785. See Stanley G. Payne, A History of Spain and Portugal (Madison, Wis., 1979), 2: 359; PTJ, description begins Julian T. Boyd, Charles T. Cullen et al., eds., The Papers of Thomas Jefferson (41 vols. to date; Princeton, N.J., 1950–) description ends 8: 95, 137; and Charles Petrie, King Charles III of Spain: An Enlightened Despot (London, 1971), 227, 229. Charles Pinckney’s rebuttal to JJ’s report argued that Spain’s influence in Portugal would be of “no consequence” at present, since he thought the United States had already concluded a treaty with Portugal. See LDC, description begins Paul H. Smith et al., eds., Letters of Delegates to the Continental Congress, 1774–1789 (26 vols.; Washington, D.C., 1976–98) description ends 23: 447–58, esp. 448; JCC, description begins Worthington C. Ford et al., eds., Journals of the Continental Congress, 1774–1789 (34 vols.; Washington, D.C., 1904–37) description ends 31: 935–48.

5For assurances JJ received that the United States could rely on Spain’s good offices in negotiations with the Algerines, see Carmichael to JJ, 9 Dec. 1785, above, and Giunta, Emerging Nation, description begins Mary A. Giunta et al., eds., The Emerging Nation: A Documentary History of the Foreign Relations of the United States under the Articles of Confederation, 1780–1789 (3 vols.; Washington, D.C., 1996) description ends 3: 262, 290–91. For threats that Spain would retaliate by withholding protection from the Barbary corsairs if the United States did not accept Spain’s terms, see the editorial note “The Barbary States: A Problem with No Ready Solution,” above. Pinckney declared that Spain could not assist the United States either with the Algerines or with Italy. See LDC, description begins Paul H. Smith et al., eds., Letters of Delegates to the Continental Congress, 1774–1789 (26 vols.; Washington, D.C., 1976–98) description ends 23: 448.

6Otto reported that Gardoqui was unconcerned about the lack of progress because the King did not consider the treaty important. Concessions authorized by Floridablanca in his instructions to Gardoqui of September 1786 and 1787, however, bear out JJ’s judgment that Spain was anxious to conclude a treaty. See the editorial note above; and LDC, description begins Paul H. Smith et al., eds., Letters of Delegates to the Continental Congress, 1774–1789 (26 vols.; Washington, D.C., 1976–98) description ends 23: 547.

8Space left blank in manuscript.

9On previous attempts to persuade Spain to open her colonies to American trade, see PRM, description begins E. James Ferguson et al., eds., The Papers of Robert Morris, 1781–1784 (9 vols.; Pittsburgh, Pa., 1973–99) description ends 8: 467–79.

10Spain allowed the lucrative trade with Manila to be conducted only through the port of Acapulco, Mexico. See William Lytle Schurz, “Mexico, Peru, and the Manila Galleon,” Hispanic American Historical Review 1 (November 1918): 389–402; and “Manila as the Spanish Gateway to the East,” Bulletin of the Business Historical Society 4 (June 1930): 3–10.

11See JJSP, description begins Elizabeth M. Nuxoll et al., eds., The Selected Papers of John Jay (3 vols. to date; Charlottesville, Va., 2010—) description ends 2: 50, 107, 233, 235, 269–70, 327, 558–59, 747–77.

Index Entries