Adams Papers

Adams’ Minutes of Crown Evidence, Concluded, and of Samuel Quincy’s Argument for the Crown: 29 November 1770

Adams’ Minutes of Crown Evidence, Concluded, and of Samuel Quincy’s Argument for the Crown1

29 November 1770

Jos. Crosbey.2Kilroys Bayonett appeared to be covered with Blood 5 or 6 Inches, next day.3

James Carter. The next Morning I observed Kilroys Bayonett to be bloody. I am Satisfyed it was blood. I was near to it, as to Mr. Paine.4

Jona. Cary. 4 of my Sons, Maverick and another Lad were at supper in my Kitchen, when the Bells rang and I told em there was fire. They said theyd eat a few mouth fulls more and go.5

Jno. Hill Esqr. Was struck at at the Ropewalks.6

Mrs. Gardiner 7

Mr. S. Quincy.8 It is my Province to apply the Evidence. It is complex and in some Places perhaps difficult.

2 Things I must prove, the Identity, and the Fact. Goes over all the Names and mentions the Witnesses who swore to each of them. Could wish that the fatigues of yesterdy and the Circumstances of my family would have allowd me to have arranged the Evidence more particular, to have extracted the most material Parts of it.

Considers J. W. Austins Testimony. Then Eb. Bridgham’s.

The last Man aim’d at a running Lad. Did not apprehend any Danger.

Dodge. Clark. Langford. As par[ti]cular as any Witness on the Part of the Crown. Boys were damning the sentry, told him the Boys would not hurt him. Gray came up. What’s here? I dont know, but Something will come of it, by and by. Gray with his Hands folded. He leaning on his Stick. He Spoke to Kilroy. D—n you you ant a going to fire. Kilroy presents at Gray, and shoots him dead upon the Spot, and then pushes at Langford with his Bayonet. Here is Evidence of an Heart desperate, wicked, bent deliberately bent upon Mischief. Compared with the Testimony of Hemenway. This is Malice. A Distinction between Malice and Hatred. Keyling 126.9 2 Inst. 6210 Mawgridges Case. Envy, Hatred and Malice. He that doth a cruel Act voluntarily doth it of Malice p[rep]ensed, tho upon a sudden Occasion.

Ferriter testifies that K[ilroy] was at the Ropewalks, and that Gray was there too, and both active in the Affray there. These Circumstances must remove all doubt of the fact and of the Species of Crime.

Archibald, J. Brewer. Saw no Abuse, more than was common. Met Dr. Young with a sword. Dr. said every Man to his own House. Perhaps some use may be made of this Circumstance. There was a general Alarm. Every Body had a Right, and it was very prudent, to arm themselves for their defence.

Bailey. Thinks Mont[gomery] kill’d Attucks. That Montgomery fired is clear from this Witness.

Mr. Palmes. Saw Montgomery. Stepd back, did not fall. Montgomery slippd in pushing 3d time at him and fell. In probability he kill’d Attucks, and continued the same mischivous Spirit in pushing.

Danbrook. Saw a Piece of Rattan. Saw M. fire. Two Persons fell.Attucks at the left Hand of this Witness and leaning on his Stick.

J. Bass. Thos. Wilkinson. The People in the Window cautioning those In the Street, not to go there. Soldiers challenging the People. Not apprehensive of danger. Well placed to observe. They must be believed if any Witnesses. Striking of the Clock. 7 went off, one flashed. Saw no pressing, nothing thrown. 2 or 3 cheers, before, none after the Party came down.

J. Simpson. Curious. Handle, Ease, support, &c. Arms. There is something like these in the Words of Command. C[aptain] P[reston] behind the Soldiers. 8 Guns.

N. Fosdick. Pressing behind him with Bayonetts, in his back. Thrusts, and pushes in the Breast and Arm.

S. Hemenway. Kilroy not in Anger nor in Liquor.

[H]elyer. People in D[ock] S[quare]afraid to go up. 20 seconds between 1 and 2d Gun. A little Boy, running and crying fire, the last Gun was pointed at him and fired.

Ferriter. 3 Attacks at the Ropewalks. Kilroy and Warren in the last Battle at the Ropewalks.

Burdick. Spoke to the bald Man, he thinks. Yes by the e[ternal] God. Intention to fire. Mem. vid. Test.11

Williams. The Guns followed the People as they ran.

Quincy.12 No doubt with me, that K[ilroy] did it sedato Animo. The Person he killed was in Peace. No Insult offerd to K.

Marshall. The Street entirely Still. Fewer People there than usual. He had been warned not to go out that Evening. Moon, to the North. Saw a Party come out of the main Guard door. D—n em where are they? By Jesus let em come. Boisterous Language. The Party came from Quaker Lane, and cryd fire. Very probable the Word fire was a Watch Word. Any one next the Meeting House, steps in, at a Cry of fire, and sets the Bell a ringing.

Mr. Thayer. Heard a Cry of Fire, and supposed it a Watch Word.

Bart. Kneeland. One pointed his Bayonet at his Breast.

Mr. Appleton, and little Master [John Appleton]. His Story and the Manner of his telling of it, must have struck deep into your Mind. Struck by a Soldier, tenderly askd him Soldier, Spare my Life. No damn you we’l kill you all. Brother Adams’s Social Creature.13 Here is food enough for the social Appetite.

Immaterial who gives the mortal Blow, where there are a Number of Persons together. All present, aiding, abetting, [are?] guilty. No Man shall be an Avenger of his own Cause unless from absolute Necessity.

J. Trowbridge. You ought to produce all your Evidence now.

1Adams Massacre Minutes, MBMS, continued without break from the end of Doc. IV above. See notes 1 and 19 above, and Descriptive List of Sources and Documents.

2Thus in MS. An apparent inadvertence for “Crosswell.”

3Wemms Trial description begins The Trial of William Wemms, James Hartegan, William M’Cauley, [and others] ... for the Murder of Crispus Attucks, [and others], ... Superior Court of Judicature, Court of Assize, and General Goal Delivery ... taken in Short-Hand by John Hodgson, Boston, 1770. description ends 53:

Joseph Crosswell, Taylor, sworn.

Next morning after the 5th of March, in King-street, before the soldiers were apprehended, I saw Killroy, I have known him by sight almost ever since he hath been here, I saw his bayonet bloody, the blood was dryed on five or six inches from the point.

Q. How near were you to the bayonet?

A. About the same distance I am from the Judges, viz, six feet.

Q. Was it shouldered?

A. I forget the posture.

Q. Are you sure it was blood.

A. It appeared to be covered from the point five or six inches, it appeared to me to be blood, and I thought then, it was blood dryed on.

4Wemms Trial description begins The Trial of William Wemms, James Hartegan, William M’Cauley, [and others] ... for the Murder of Crispus Attucks, [and others], ... Superior Court of Judicature, Court of Assize, and General Goal Delivery ... taken in Short-Hand by John Hodgson, Boston, 1770. description ends 53:

James Carter, Writing-school-master, sworn.

The next morning I observed the same with Mr. Crosswell, I do not know his name, but that’s the man, (pointing to Killroy) his gun was rested on his right arm.

Q. Did it appear to you to be covered from the point with blood?

A. Yes, I am positive it was blood.

Q. How nigh was you to him?

A. As nigh as I am to you, Sir, viz. three feet off.

It is not clear whether at this point Paine had taken over the examination of the witnesses. Possibly the witness here was merely pointing at Paine. “James Carter. Next morning I saw Kilroy Bayonet bloody. I called several to look at it. 3 feet.” Paine Massacre Notes.

5Wemms Trial description begins The Trial of William Wemms, James Hartegan, William M’Cauley, [and others] ... for the Murder of Crispus Attucks, [and others], ... Superior Court of Judicature, Court of Assize, and General Goal Delivery ... taken in Short-Hand by John Hodgson, Boston, 1770. description ends 53:

Jonathan Cary, Kegg-maker, sworn.

Q. Did you know young Maverick, who was killed by the firing in King-street, on the 5th of March?

A. Yes, very well.

Q. Did you see him that night?

A. He was at my house that night at supper with some young lads, and when the bells rung, as we all thought for fire, he run out in order to go to it.

6Wemms Trial description begins The Trial of William Wemms, James Hartegan, William M’Cauley, [and others] ... for the Murder of Crispus Attucks, [and others], ... Superior Court of Judicature, Court of Assize, and General Goal Delivery ... taken in Short-Hand by John Hodgson, Boston, 1770. description ends 53–54:

John Hill, Esq; sworn.

Q. Did you see any thing of the affray at the Rope-walks?

A. I saw a party of the soldiers near the Rope-walks with clubs, ordered them to disperse, commanded the peace, told them I was in commission for the peace, they paid no regard to me or my orders, but cut an old man who was coming by, before my face, and some of them struck at me but did not hit me.

Q. Were any of the prisoners among them?

A. I do not know that they were.

“Mary Gardner. Overruled.” Paine Massacre Notes. The Wemms Trial description begins The Trial of William Wemms, James Hartegan, William M’Cauley, [and others] ... for the Murder of Crispus Attucks, [and others], ... Superior Court of Judicature, Court of Assize, and General Goal Delivery ... taken in Short-Hand by John Hodgson, Boston, 1770. description ends is silent.

8Here Samuel Quincy’s argument for the Crown begins. It is given in fuller form in Doc. VII below.

9Reg. v. Mawgridge, Kelyng description begins John Kelyng, Report of divers Cases in Pleas of the Crown, with Directions for Justices of the Peace, 2d edn., London, 1739. description ends 119, 126–127, 84 Eng. Rep. description begins The English Reports; 176 vols. A collection and translation into English of all the early English reporters. description ends 1107, 1110–1111 (Q.B. 1707). The quotations are set out in Doc. VII below.

102 Coke, Institutes description begins Edward Coke, Second Part of the Institutes of the Lawes of England; containing the exposition of many ancient and other Statutes, London, 1642. description ends 62. The quotation is set out in Doc. VII below.

11The last three words indicate that JA’s recollection of the witness’ testimony differs from Quincy’s.

12An interval of space precedes this name in the MS, as if JA had omitted some of Samuel Quincy’s argument; or perhaps the proceedings had been interrupted.

13This refers to JA’s argument in Rex v. Preston, text between notes 2 and 3.

Index Entries