James Madison Papers

To James Madison from Francis Corbin, 3 April 1816

From Francis Corbin

The Reeds, Virginia Apl. 3d. 1816.
Wh: Ch: Po: Off:

Dear Sir

Orders, it is said, have been issued to the Collectors of the Federal Taxes and Excise to receive none but Virginia Notes, although more than one half of the people, in this central part of the State, sold their Crops, previous to such orders, for the Bank Notes of the Chartered Banks of the District of Columbia, from a belief that, as those Banks were established by Congress, and are under the immediate controul of the Secretary of the Treasury, and the Auspices of the Federal Government, they were as good, and even better, than the Notes of the Virginia Banks or of any of the Banks of any single State. These “Ex post Facto” orders can have no other Effect than to favor speculators & the vilest part of the Community, the Town Monopolizers of Bank Discounts, Town Usurers, Town Sharpers and Shavers, “et hoc genus omne.”1 If some new order be not issued the Collectors will swindle the people and the Federal Treasury out of large Sums; the most grievous injustice will be done to our Farmers & Planters, and will, I am satisfied, occasion difficulties in the Collection and the greatest distress to the people.

Owing to the machinations of artful and designing speculators, the curtailment of Discounts by the two Virginia Banks, and an unfortunate Act of the last Assembly,2 which I think impolitic and unconstitutional, an artificial difference has been created in some Counties, in others not, between the notes of Our Banks and those of the Chartered Banks of the District. This difference, which varies, according to the proximity of places to the Seat of machinations, from 12 ½ pr. Ct. in Richmond to 6 pr. Ct. in Frederick’sbrg, will be so much money picked from the Pockets of the People. This, tho’ it will be a loss to them, will be no gain to the Fedl. Treasury, but will be a clear profit to the Collectors. It is surmised indeed, tho’ I cannot give any Credit to the surmise, that the Bank of Pennsylvania is largely indebted to the Bank of Virginia, and that the Treasury Order may be intended, perhaps, to aid the former in the discharge of it’s debt to the latter. Incredible!

It has been always reckoned by wise and honest Rulers, like yourself, a blessed thing to have some friend to communicate to him salutary truths on public affairs and on the public opinion of them.3 Knowing this to be your virtuous sentiment I have written this letter with my accustomed frankness, and without any reserve.

Be pleased to present my respectful compliments to Mrs. Madison, and accept for yourself the very sincere and friendly regards of Dear Sir, with the greatest Consideration, your much obliged and most faithful Hle. Servt.

Francis Corbin

RC (DLC).

1And everything of that kind.

2Corbin may have been referring to “An Act to amend and explain an Act, entitled, an Act to amend the several Acts prescribing the mode of ascertaining the taxable property within the Commonwealth, and of collecting the public revenue …,” passed on 27 Feb. 1816 (Acts Passed at a General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Virginia, Begun … on Monday the Fourth Day of December … One Thousand Eight Hundred and Fifteen … [Richmond, 1816; Shaw and Shoemaker description begins R. R. Shaw and R. H. Shoemaker, comps., American Bibliography: A Preliminary Checklist for 1801–1819 (22 vols.; New York, 1958–66). description ends 39680], 7–9).

3JM received other questions about the taxes imposed during the War of 1812. According to Representative John Forsyth of Georgia, reporting a conversation he had had with JM, in a letter to Gov. David B. Mitchell (Forsyth to Mitchell, 6 May 1816 [GU: Telamon Cuyler Collection]), the collection of the taxes in that state would be “oppressive to the people.” He had suggested to the president that “an arrangement might be made by the Governor of Georgia which would render it unnecessary,” namely that the governor “place to the credit of the U.S. at one of the Banks in Georgia the whole amount of the Tax due in this State for the current year.” JM had apparently replied that he “could not give more than a general assurance that everything which could properly be done should be performed to save the State from any inconvenience this circumstance was likely to produce,” since he had yet to consult with the Secretary of the Treasury (ibid.).

Index Entries