James Madison Papers
Documents filtered by: Recipient="Monroe, James"
sorted by: date (ascending)
Permanent link for this document:
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Madison/01-08-02-0092

From James Madison to James Monroe, 4 December 1784

To James Monroe

Richmond Decr. 4. 1784

Dear Sir

On Saturday last a proposition was agreed to for establishing Circuit Courts throughout this Commonwealth, and yesterday a bill for that purpose was reported.1 On wednesday next it will undergo a discussion of the Come. of the Whole. The circumstances under which it has passed thus far seem to promise a favorable issue, but the dangers which it is yet to go thro’ are formidable. They proceed from latent & interested objections which have on several former occasions proved fatal to similar attempts. The plan is pretty analagous to the Nisi prius establishmt. in England.2 On Teusday sundry propositions were made by Mr. Jones, in favor of the 4 art. of the Treaty of peace. They passed by a large majority with blanks as to the length of time to be given for the payment of the principal and for disallowing the interest. The former was filled up with seven years, in preference of 10, 8, 6, & 5 which were contended for on different sides. The latter with the period between Apl. 19: 1775, & March. 3. 1783, in preference to the period between the first date & May 1784, the date of the exchange of Ratifications. The bill will probably pass but not I fear without some improper ingredients, & particularly some conditions relative to the N. W. Posts or the Negroes which lye without our province. The bill for the Religious Asst. was reported yesterday and will be taken up in a Come. of the Whole next week. Its friends are much disheartened at the loss of Mr. Henry.3 Its fate is I think very uncertain. Another act4 of the H. of D. during the prest. week is a direction to the Executive to carry into effect the vote of a Bust to the M. de la fayette, to be presented to the City of Paris, & to cause another to be procured to be set up in this Country. These resolutions are so contrived as to hide as much as possible the circumstance in the original vote of the bust being to be presented to the Marquis himself. I find by a Letter from Gl. Washington that he was on the 28th. ult: just setting out to accompany the Marquis to Annapolis & thence to Baltimore. The latter may therefore soon be expected at Trenton. He has been much caressed here as well as every where else in his Tour, and I make no doubt he will leave Congs. with equal reason to be pleased with his visit. I meant to have sent you a copy of the Resolutions touching the Busts, but have been disappointed in getting one. They were offered by Mr. Jones & agreed to unanimously, as they no doubt will also be in the Senate. Wishing you all happiness I am Dr. Sir Yrs Sincerely

J. Madison Jr.

RC (DLC). Docketed by JM. Addressed to Monroe “in Congress.”

2The “Nisi prius establishmt.” which had been the model for Edmund Pendleton’s original draft of the circuit court bill provided for “the trial of issues of fact before a jury and one presiding judge” (Henry C. Black, Black’s Law Dictionary [St. Paul, 1951], p. 1197).

3Patrick Henry’s vote was lost when he was chosen governor and retired from the House of Delegates. On 24 Dec. the House, by a 45 to 38 vote, tabled the General Assessment bill until the Oct. 1785 session (JHDV description begins Journal of the House of Delegates of the Commonwealth of Virginia; Begun and Held at the Capitol, in the City of Williamsburg. Beginning in 1780, the portion after the semicolon reads, Begun and Held in the Town of Richmond. In the County of Henrico. The journal for each session has its own title page and is individually paginated. The edition used is the one in which the journals for 1777–1786 are brought together in two volumes, with each journal published in Richmond in either 1827 or 1828 and often called the “Thomas W. White reprint.” description ends , Oct. 1784, p. 82). JM voted for the deferment.

4JM deleted some four or five words at the beginning of this sentence and substituted “Another act.” The penmanship indicates JM made the alteration at some later time, after the return of the document.

Index Entries