John Jay Papers
Documents filtered by: Recipient="Jay, John"
sorted by: date (descending)
Permanent link for this document:
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jay/01-07-02-0405

To John Jay from Richard Peters, 21 February 1826

From Richard Peters

Belmont February 21st. 1826.

My dear Sir

I am recovering from a long spell of our fashionable Influenza which is leaving me debilitated; but not materially injured. Generally, thro’ a long pilgrimage, I have had no ^durable^ ill health or disease, chronic or temporary. So that it would be ingratitude to a kind providence, in me to complain. I often think of the few old friends left behind the multitudes who are gone to that undiscovered country “from whose bourne no traveller returns.”1 Among them, my recollections of the long & sincere love & friendship I have undeviatingly cherished for you, affords to me the most gratifying & cordial satisfaction.

I have been often impressively solicited to request your permission to make public your letters to me on the subject of our beloved Washington’s valedictory Address. But I have not deemed myself warranted so to do, without consulting your opinion & inclination. Were it optional with me, I would, assuredly, furnish every information required by the friends of our chief, & indeed by every friend to his country. The base endeavours made by the Hamilton family, to withdraw from the political creed of every sincere patriot, the name which gives to it the highest lustre & its fortunate & merited influence; has produced a crisis demanding every means to defeat their vain & unwarrantable attempt. Every thing they can do is & has been long Known. But nothing appears on the true & important side of the question. We have, here, an historical Society, composed of intelligent, literary, & highly respectable members; who are uneasy & even indignant under the present state of that subject. I copy for your perusal recent requests I have received from them; & beg you would be pleased to communicate to me your sentiments as to your former letters; & accompany them with any additional observations you deem fit.

Mrs. Hamilton, under the pretext of a friendly visit, went to Mount Vernon, & prevailed, gradatim & artfully, on Judge Washington,2 to search all the Papers in his possession, left by the General, for any letters, drafts, or copies of anything written by Col Hamilton, for or to Genl W. But not a scrape of a pen could be found suitable to her purpose. No copy of the Farewell Address, or anything relating to it. Ch. Justice ^Marshall^ also diligently searched, among the papers from which he composed Genl. W’s life;3 & the same result occurred. So that I am satisfied, that Col. H. never sent on the copy of the Address you mention, with the amendments engrafted in it; but may have sent the separate paper containing them, with the return of the original. If this fair copy be now found among his (Col. H’s) papers, or elsewhere it is the one which has roused the vanity of Mrs. H. & family. You will perceive in Mr Rawle’s letter that there are many interlineations in the original now found in the hands of the printer. Whether these, all or any of them, be those suggested by you & the other friends to whom the original draft was sent; it would be difficult, if not impossible, now to decide. At any rate the discovery is enough to defeat the unjust, silly, & mishievous project of the H. family.

(Copy)

“Dear Sir.

The historical society of Pennsylvania has appointed us a Committee, to obtain such information as may be practicable in respect to the originality of the composition of the valedictory Address of the venerable & beloved Washington.

Conceiving that it may be in your power to throw light on a subject which has lately excited so much interest; we take the liberty of requesting a communication of such facts & impressions in relation to it, as you may be willing to suffer us to lay before the public. With the greatest respect & esteem, we are your sincere friends &c,

Judge Peters.

William Rawle.
Benjn. R. Morgan.
C. J. Ingersol.[”]

Extract from a letter from Mr Rawle (President of the Society)

13th. Feby 1826.

“Mr C. Ingersol tells me he had a conversation with you, on the subject of the valedictory address of the man whom you & I loved & revered; but whose particular friendship you most eminently possessed.

In the new attempt to strip him of a portion of his merits, we, (the members of the historical Society,) take a warm interest to defend his exalted name. I have seen & read the Manuscript, in the hands of Mr Claypoole the printer of the address, who requested, & was permitted by, Genl W. to retain it,4 every word of which is in his own writing; & it cannot be believed that he would have laboriously copied the composition of another. It fills 32 quarto pages; & has all the marks of being from the original Author: — such as erasures, interlineations, transposition of paragraphs, &c.

You, my dear Sir, can, I find from Mr Ingersol, throw much light on the subject. You have, I am told, a letter, certificate, or testimonial, from Mr Jay, explaining the whole transaction. It would be highly satisfactory to us to be permitted to see, & if not improper, to make it known to the public.”

With your approbation I will communicate such parts of your letters, as are deemed essential; & take the responsibility for so doing on myself— or do it in any way agreeable to you. With the most affectionate assurances of my sincere & uninterrupted friendship, believe me ever most truly yours,

Richard Peters.

John Jay Esqr.

ALS, NNC (EJ: 09584). Addressed: “John Jay Esqr / Bedford / State of/ New York”. Endorsed: “Judge Peters / Recd. By Post— 21 25 Feby 1826 / answd. 3d. March—”. Endorsed: “The above endorsement / is the autograph of / Chief Justice Jay—”. C, NNC (EJ: 09585). For JJ and the disputed authorship of Washington’s Farewell Address, see the editorial note “Jay, History, and Memory,” above.

1Hamlet, act 3, scene 1: An undiscovered country from whose bourne no traveller returns.

2Elizabeth Hamilton visited Bushrod Washington in July 1818. However, in a letter dated 6 Oct. 1825, to Charles King, Washington stated that while she requested letters from him, “To the best of my recollection the farewell address was never alluded to, even in conversation and I feel considerable confidence in stating that it was not until after this visit, that I was informed in Phila, by a friend, that the authorship of that address was attributed to Genl H. in whispers by certains in N. York & Phila—”. The friend was presumably RP. Paltsits, Washington’s Farewell Address, 81, 279–81.

3Marshall published his Life of George Washington, in five volumes, from 1804 to 1807. In his reply to the committee of 22 Feb. 1826, Marshall wrote “I have no information on the claims which have been made for others to the composition of this address, nor do I know anything, except from public report, which is not in the correspondence that was placed in my hands. I have seen nothing there to induce suspicion that it was written by any other than its avowed author.” Memoirs of the HSP, 245.

4David C. Claypoole (1757–1849) first published the address in the Philadelphia-based American Daily Advertiser, 19 Sept. 1796. Claypoole’s statement, with a memoir by Rawles, was published in the Memoirs of the HSP, 265–67.

Index Entries