1. Not found.

2. On the evening of 22 Feb. a ball in honor of George Washington was held at Ricketts’ Circus in Philadelphia, preceded by an artillery salute at the arsenal and a parade of military volunteers. The following day JA reported to AA (Adams Papers) his attendance, despite frigid weather, which he staved off by drinking three glasses of madeira at dinner and two more on arriving home (Philadelphia Gazette, 21, 23 Feb.).

3. After French overtures to William Vans Murray and Joel Barlow, JA on 18 Feb. nominated Murray to serve as minister plenipotentiary on a second peace mission to France. Many Federalists were shocked by JA’s decision, in part because he did not consult with anyone about it, including the members of his cabinet. Timothy Pickering described Federalists as being “thunderstruck” about the decision, and James McHenry later called the nomination “either doubted or condemned by most if not all of the federal members of Congress.” McHenry also alleged that JA’s decision to act without the knowledge of his cabinet broke with “established practice,” a view shared by both Alexander Hamilton and Theodore Sedgwick when they also voiced opposition to the move. Boston Federalist George Cabot branded its supporters “Federal hypocrites with Jacobin hearts.” However, not all Federalists opposed the nomination, including John Jay, Henry Knox, John Marshall, and Washington, all of whom felt that JA’s timely measure would avert war with France. The press response was also mixed. William Cobbett’s Philadelphia Porcupine’s Gazette, 20 Feb., satirized the nomination, labeling it “a most atrocious falshood.” The Philadelphia Aurora General Advertiser, 20 Feb., supported JA’s decision, and so too did the Boston Independent Chronicle, 25–28 Feb., Boston Columbian Centinel, 27 Feb., and Massachusetts Mercury, 1 March. After members of Congress expressed a preference for a delegation over a single envoy, JA on 25 Feb. nominated Patrick Henry and Oliver Ellsworth to join Murray. The Senate confirmed the appointments on 27 Feb., and—after Henry declined and was replaced by William R. Davie on 1 June—the envoys departed for France on 3 Nov. (U.S. Senate, Exec. Jour. description begins Journal of the Executive Proceedings of the Senate of the United States of America, Washington, D.C., 1789–. description ends , 5th Cong., 3d sess., p. 313–314, 317–319; Hamilton, Papers description begins The Papers of Alexander Hamilton, ed. Harold C. Syrett, Jacob E. Cooke, and others, New York, 1961–1987; 27 vols. description ends , 22:487–490, 493, 500, 503–504; 24:24; 25:212–215, 220; Henry Cabot Lodge, Life and Letters of George Cabot, Boston, 1878, p. 224; Washington, Papers, Retirement Series description begins The Papers of George Washington: Retirement Series, ed. W. W. Abbot, Edward G. Lengel, and others, Charlottesville, Va., 1997–1999; 4 vols. description ends , 3:389–390, 4:397; DeConde, The Quasi-War description begins Alexander DeConde, The Quasi-War: The Politics and Diplomacy of the Undeclared War with France, 1797–1801, New York, 1966. description ends , p. 183; Elkins and McKitrick, Age of Federalism description begins Stanley Elkins and Eric McKitrick, The Age of Federalism, New York, 1993. description ends , p. 617–620).

4. After the Porcupine’s Gazette expressed vociferous opposition to JA’s proposed second mission to France, the New York Mercantile Advertiser, 27 Feb., suggested that Cobbett would be deported under the Alien Act. Cobbett responded in Porcupine’s Gazette, 28 Feb., that despite such rumors he was confident that no deportation order was forthcoming because JA would not use the Alien Act “as the means of gratifying his own private revenge.” Cobbett was not prosecuted, but he later alleged that JA did indeed contemplate such an order: “I was afterwards informed, by those who knew the fact, that the Old Man really thought of sending me off, but was opposed in his project by the Attorney General” (William Cobbett, Porcupine’s Works; Containing Various Writings and Selections, Exhibiting a Faithful Picture of the United States of America, 12 vols., London, 1801, 10:153).

5. AA replied to this letter on 3 March, reporting that the news of Murray’s appointment had “universally Electrified the public,” because “it came so sudden Was a measure so unexpected, that the whole community were like a flock of frightned pigions; nobody had their Story ready: some call’d it a hasty measure; others condemnd it as an inconsistant one; some swore some cursd.” Observers marveled that JA had made the nomination without consulting advisers, AA said, and she congratulated him on his self-reliance: “The true Americans whose confidence is firm, and unshaken; believe & say, that the President acts an independant part, pinning his faith upon no Mans sleave.” Wagers were being made as to whether the Senate would confirm the nomination, she added, noting that she had discussed her views on the subject only with TBA. AA also expressed outrage at Cobbett’s “impudence” (Adams Papers).