To George Washington from Edmund Randolph, 21 October 1794
From Edmund Randolph
Philadelphia October 21. 1794
Sir
A New York paper of yesterday declares in the most express terms, that the British instruction of the 8th of June 1793, so far as relates to the carrying of corn, meal and Flour to France, is revoked. It comes in such a shape, that I believe it; and we may hourly expect something on that head. You recollect, that this was the first order, which bore upon the United States, and is the same, upon which Mr Pinckney, Mr Hammond and myself kept up a controvery. If it be true, it is a very pleasant indication.1
By a letter from Baltimore, which was shewn to me this morning, it appears, that Colo. Monroe arrived in France, during the first week in August; and the fall of Robespierre is put beyond every possibility of question. The time of his arrival renders it impossible for him to be associated with Robespierrian politics. I have the honor sir, to be with the highest respect yr mo. ob. serv.
Edm: Randolph
ALS, DNA: RG 59, Miscellaneous Letters; LB, DNA: RG 59, Domestic Letters; LB, DNA: RG 59, GW’s Correspondence with His Secretaries of State.
1. This news appeared in the Daily Advertiser (New York), 20 Oct., contained in a letter from R. Parker to Messrs. Harrison, Ausley, and Co. For a summary of the British orders of 8 June 1793, see Thomas Jefferson to GW, 30 Aug. 1793, n.1; for the full text, see , 1:240. Even before official notification of the orders was received, the U.S. minister to Great Britain, Thomas Pinckney, was directed “provisionally” to protest the orders (Jefferson to Pinckney, 7 Sept. 1793, , Foreign Relations , 27:55–59). For the continuing controversy to which Randolph refers here, see GW to the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives, 12 May 1794, n.2.