James Madison Papers

From James Madison to Jared Sparks, 5 January 1828

To Jared Sparks

Montpellier Jany. 5. 1828

Dear Sir

I received two days ago your favour of Decr. 29. That of Augst. 25. came also safe to hand. I did not then acknowledge it, because I expected soon to have an occasion for doing it on the receit. of the letters since put into the hands of Col. Storrow. Having heard nothing from him on the subject I conclude that he retains them for a better conveyance than he had found; though I am not without apprehension of some casualty to the packet on the way.

For a reason formerly glanced at, namely, the advantage of having before me the whole of my correspondence with Genl. Washington, in estimating his purpose as to particular portions of it, I did not make use of the suggested opportunity to Washington by my neighbour Mr. P. P. Barbour. I shall now conform to your last suggestion, and await your return from Europe. In the mean time I thank you for your promise to send me the copies of letters from Genl. Washington to me, which are missing on my files. This I hope can be done before your departure.

It1 would afford me particular pleasure to favour in any way, your interesting objects in visiting Europe, and especially by letters to Correspondents who could be of service to you. It happens however that I have not a single one either in Great Britain or in Holland. Our Consul Mr. Maury at Liverpool, is an old & intimate friend, and if you intend to take that place in your route to London, and you think it worth while, I shall gladly give you a line of introduction to his hospitality, and such little services as he may be able to render. In France, you will doubtless be able to obtain through Genl. Lafayette alone, every proper key to the documentary treasures attainable there; besides what his own files may furnish.

I have given a hasty look at Genl. Washingtons letters, with an eye to your request of such autographic specimens as might be proper for depositories in Europe. As letters of little significancy in themselves, might not be worthy of such a use, my attention was chiefly directed to those of a higher character; and I am not sure that there is one such, which is not of too confidential a stamp, or which does not contain personalities too delicate, for the purpose in question. You will be aware also that some of his letters, especially when written in haste, shew specks of inaccuracy which tho’ not derogating at all from the greatness of his character, might disappoint readers abroad accustomed to regard him as a model even in the performances of his pen. It is to be presumed that his correspondence with me, as with a few others, has more of reference to subjects & occasions involving confidential traits, than his correspondence with those less intimate with him. I will again turn to his letters and see whether there be any free from the objections hinted at.

You wish me to say whether I believe “that at the beginning of the Revolution, or at the assembling of the first Congress, the leaders of that day, were resolved on Independence.” I readily express my entire belief that they were not, tho’ I must admit that my means of information were more limited than may have been the case with others still living to answer the enquiry. My first entrance on public life was in May 1776 when I became a member of the Convention in Virginia, which instructed her delegates in Congress to propose the Declaration of Independence. Previous to that date, I was not in sufficient communication with any under the denomination of leaders, to learn their sentiments or views on that cardinal subject. I can only say therefore, that so far as ever came to my knowledge, no one of them ever avowed, or was understood to entertain a pursuit of independence at the assembling of the first Congress, or for a very considerable period thereafter. It has always been my impression that a re-establishment of the Colonial relations to the parent Country previous to the controversy, was the real object of every class of the people, till despair of obtaining it, and the exasperating effects of the war, and the manner of conducting it, prepared the minds of all for the event declared on the 4th of July 1776, as preferable with all its difficulties & perils, to the alternative of submission to a claim of power, at once external, unlimited, irresponsible, and under every temptation to abuse, from interest, ambition & revenge. If there were individuals who originally aimed at Independence, their views must have been confined to their own bosoms or to a very confidential circle.

Allow me Sir to express anew, my best wishes for a success in your historical plan, commensurate with its extent & importance; and my disposition to contribute such mites towards it as may be in my power.

Do me the favour to say when & from what port you propose to embark. May I venture to add a request of the result of your enquiry at Philada. on the subject of the paper in the hands of Claypole,2 as far as it may be proper to disclose it, & trust it to the mail. With great esteem & friendly respects

James Madison

RC (MH-H); FC (DLC). RC docketed by Sparks: “From James Madison Jany. 13. 1828 Recd. Washington.” FC in John C. Payne’s hand; docketed by JM, with his notation: “Note—what is in brackets to be omitted” (see n. 1 below).

1In the FC this paragraph and the next were bracketed by JM.

2David C. Claypoole (1757–1849) was apprenticed to and later partner of John Dunlap; together they published a Philadelphia newspaper, Dunlap and Claypoole’s American Daily Advertiser. On Dunlap’s retirement in 1795, Claypoole became the editor and publisher of Claypoole’s American Daily Advertiser (Gary A. Trudgen, “David C. Claypoole … Patriot Printer,” SAR Magazine 86, no. 3 [1992]: 16–19).

Index Entries