James Madison Papers
Documents filtered by: Author="Madison, James" AND Recipient="Randolph, Edmund"
sorted by: date (ascending)
Permanent link for this document:
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Madison/01-06-02-0029

From James Madison to Edmund Randolph, 22 January 1783

To Edmund Randolph

Printed text (Madison, Papers [Gilpin ed.] description begins Henry D. Gilpin, ed., The Papers of James Madison (3 vols.; Washington, 1840). description ends , I, 111–12). The manuscript of the letter, which is missing, probably was lost between 1840 and 1865, the dates of publication of the Gilpin and Congressional editions, respectively. JM inadvertently dated the letter “1782” rather than 1783. The error was his rather than Gilpin’s, for JM’s own chronological list of his letters to Randolph, prepared ca. 1821, shows this letter as of “1782. Jany. 22” (LC: Madison Papers). See also Papers of Madison description begins William T. Hutchinson, William M. E. Rachal, et al., eds., The Papers of James Madison (6 vols. to date; Chicago, 1962——). description ends , III, 100, ed. n.; IV, 41, ed. n. The manuscript of this letter may have contained one or more sentences omitted by Henry D. Gilpin. See Randolph to JM, 7 Feb. 1783, and n. 10.

Philadelphia, January 22, 1782[3]1

Dear Sir,

The repeal of the impost act by Virginia is still considered as covered with some degree of mystery.2 Colonel Bland’s representations do not remove the veil. Indeed, he seems as much astonished at it, and as unable to penetrate it, as any of us.3 Many have surmised that the enmity of Doctor Lee against Morris is at the bottom of it. But had that been the case, it can scarcely be supposed that the repeal would have passed so quietly.4 By this time, I presume, you will be able to furnish me with its true history, and I ask the favor of you to do it.5 Virginia could never have cut off this source of public relief at a more unlucky crisis than when she is protesting her inability to comply with the continental requisitions.6 She will, I hope, be yet made sensible of the impropriety of the step she has taken, and make amends by a more liberal grant. Congress cannot abandon the plan as long as there is a spark of hope.7 Nay, other plans on a like principle must be added. Justice, gratitude, our reputation abroad, and our tranquillity at home, require provision for a debt of not less than fifty millions of dollars,8 and I pronounce that this provision will not be adequately met by separate acts of the States. If there are not revenue laws which operate at the same time through all the States, and are exempt from the control of each—the mutual jealousies which begin already to appear among them will assuredly defraud both our foreign and domestic creditors of their just claims.9

The deputies of the army are still here, urging the objects of their mission. Congress are thoroughly impressed with the justice of them, and are disposed to do every thing which depends on them. But what can a Virginia Delegate say to them, whose constituents declare that they are unable to make the necessary contributions, and unwilling to establish funds for obtaining them elsewhere? The valuation of lands is still under consideration.10

1See hdn.

4Harrison to JM, 4 Jan. 1783, and nn. 3, 4.

6Papers of Madison description begins William T. Hutchinson, William M. E. Rachal, et al., eds., The Papers of James Madison (6 vols. to date; Chicago, 1962——). description ends , V, 457–58; Delegates to Harrison, 21 Jan. 1783, and n. 2.

7The “amends” obviously could not be made before the Virginia General Assembly convened in May 1783, unless a special session met earlier. By “the plan,” JM meant the proposed impost amendment of the Articles of Confederation.

8Considerations of “Justice” and “gratitude” to King Louis XVI of France should impel Congress to pay the overdue interest on loans from the royal treasury and on loans, for which he had stood security, from Dutch bankers. Prolonged default in meeting these interest charges would injure the “reputation” of the United States abroad and thereby bar Congress from negotiating further loans. Similar considerations and also “tranquillity at home” required that the “just claims” of the clamorous civilian creditors and the obviously discontented continental army should be honored. See Papers of Madison description begins William T. Hutchinson, William M. E. Rachal, et al., eds., The Papers of James Madison (6 vols. to date; Chicago, 1962——). description ends , V, 424, n. 9; 473; 474, n. 8; Randolph to JM, 3 Jan., and n. 12; 15 Jan., n. 13; JM to Randolph, 7 Jan.; JM Notes, 9–10 Jan., and nn. 12–14; 13 Jan., and nn. 5, 17; 17 Jan., and n. 2; Conference with Morris, 10 Jan. 1783, n. 5.

10JM Notes, 9–10 Jan., and nn. 2, 3; 14 Jan., and nn. 2, 4, 6, 7, 9; JM to Randolph, 14 Jan., and nn. 4, 5; Delegates to Harrison, 21 Jan. 1783, n. 2.

Index Entries