John Jay Papers
Documents filtered by: Author="Jay, John"
sorted by: date (ascending)
Permanent link for this document:
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jay/01-01-02-0107

Proofs That the Colonies Do Not Aim at Independence, after 9 December 1775

Proofs That the Colonies Do Not Aim at Independence

[Philadelphia, after 9 December 1775]

It has long been the Art of the Enemies of America to sow ^the Seeds of^ Dissensions among us and thereby weaken that Union on which our Salvation from Tyranny depends. For this Purpose Jealousies have ^been^ endeavoured to be excited, and false Reports, wicked Slanders and insidious Misrepresentations been so industriously formed and propagated

Well knowing that while the People reposed the Confidence in the Congress, the Designs of the Ministry would probably be frustrated no Pains have been spared to traduce, and ^that^ respectable Assembly and misrepresent their Designs and Actions.

Among other aspersions cast upon them, is an ungenerous & groundless Charge of their aiming at Independence, or [illegible] a total Separation from G. Britain.

Whoever will be at the Trouble of reviewing their Journal will find ample Testimony against this accusation, and for the Sake of those ^who^ may not have either Leisure or Opportunity of ^to^ persueng it, I have selected the following Paragraphs which abundantly prove the Malice and Falsity of such a Charge—

Page 59

Page 59. The Congress in giving orders for securing the Stores taken at Crown Point & Ticonderogah direct “That an Exact Inventory be taken of all such Cannon and Stores, in order that they may be safely returned, when the Restoration of the former Harmony between Great Britain & these Colonies, so ardently wished for by the latter shall render it prudent and consistent with the over-ruling Law of self Preservation.1

Page 63. The Congress after resolving that the Colonies ought to be put in a State of Defence—thus proceed [illegible] “But as we most ardently wish for a Restoration of the Harmony formerly subsisting between our Mother Country and these Colonies, the Interruption of which must, at all Events be exceedingly injurious to both Countries, that with a sincere Design of contributing by all the Means in our Power, (not incompatible with a just Regard for the undoubted Rights and true Interests of these Colonies) to the Promotion of this most desirable Reconciliation, and ^an^ humble and dutiful Petition be presented to his Majesty Resolved that Measures be entered into for opening a negotiation, in order to accommodate the unhappy Disputes subsisting between Great Britain and these Colonies, and that this be made a Part of the Petition to the King.”2

Page 64. The Congress recommend to the Convention of New York

“to persevere the more vigorously in preparing for their Defence, as it is very uncertain whether the earnest endeavours of the Congress to accommodate the unhappy Differences between Great Britain and the Colonies, by conciliatory measures, will be successful.”3

Page 84 The Congress in order to rescue the Province of Massachusetts Bay from Anarchy, advise them to that their “Assembly or Council exercise the Powers of Government until a Governor of his Majesty’s Appointment will consent to govern them the colony according to its Charter.”4

Page 87 The Congress in their vote for a general fast did recommended ^that^ we should “offer up our joint Supplications to the all wise, omnipotent & merciful Disposer of all Events (among other Things) “to bless our rightful Sovereign King George the Third—that a speedy End may be put to the civil Discord between Great Britain and the American Colonies without further Effusion of Blood. “And that all America may soon behold the a gracious Interposition of Heaven for the Redress of her many Grievances, the Restoration of her invaded Rights and a Reconciliation with the parent State on Terms constitutional and honorable to both5

Page 149. The Congress after declaring the Reasons which compelled them to recur to arms, then express themselves—“Lest this Declaration should disquiet the Minds of our Friends & Fellow Subjects in any Part of the Empire, we assure them that we mean not to dissolve that Union which has so long & so happily subsisted between us, and which we sincerely wish to see restored. Necessity has not yet driven us into that desperate Measure, or induced us to excite any other Nation to War against them. We have not raised Armies with ambitious Designs of separating from Great Britain, and establishing independent States.6

[Page] 150 “We most humbly implore the divine Goodness to dispose our Adversaries to Reconciliation on reasonable Terms.7

Page 155—In the Petition to the King, every Line of which breaths affection for his Majesty & Great Britain, are these remarkable Sentences:

“Attached to your Majesty’s Person Family & Government, with all ^the^ Devotion that Principle & affection can inspire, connected with Great Britain by the strongest Ties that can unite Societies; and deploring every Event that tends in any Degree to weaken them, we solemnly assure your Majesty, that we not only most ardently desire the former Harmony between her and these Colonies may be restored, but that a Concord may be established between them upon so firm a Basis as to perpetuate its Blessings uninterrupted by any future Generations Dissentions to succeeding Generations in both countries.” “We beg Leave further to assure your Majesty that notwithstanding the Sufferings of your loyal Colonists during the Course of this present Controversy our Breasts retain too tender a Regard for the Kingdom from which we derive our Origin, to request such a Reconciliation as might in any Manner be inconsistent with her Dignity or Welfare.”8

Page 163 In the ^last^ Address of the Congress to the People of Great Britain are the following Passages

We are accused of aiming at Independence; but how is this accusation supported? by the allegations of your Ministers not by our Actions—Abused insulted & contemned what steps have we pursued to obtain Redress?—We have carried our dutiful Petitions to the Throne—We have applied to your Justice for Relief.”

page 165 “Give us leave most solemnly to assure you, that we have not yet lost Sight of the Object we have ever had in View, a Reconciliation with you on constitutional Principles, and a Restoration of that friendly Intercourse which to the Advantage of both, we till lately maintained.”9

Page 174

Page 172 ^In^ the Address of the Congress to the Lord Mayor Alderman and Livery of London, there is this Paragraph vizt.

North America My Lords; wishes most ardently for a lasting Connection with Great Britain on Terms of just and equal Liberty.”10

From these Testimonies the it appears extremely evident that to be charge the Congress with aiming at a separation of these Colonies from great Britain is to charge them falsely and without a single Spark of Evidence to support the Accusation

Many other Passages in their Journal might be mentioned, but as that would exceed the Limits of this Paper, I shall reserve them for some future Publication.

It is much to be wished that People would read the Proceedings of the Congress and judge for themselves consult their own Judgments, and not suffer themselves to be duped by Men who are paid for deceiving them.

ADft, PWacD: Sol Feinstone Collection, on deposit, PPAmP (EJ: 11815). Endorsed in another hand: “Proofs that the colonies do not aim at independence. Probably in 1775.” Dating of this text is derived from its citations to an edition of the journals of Congress published in December 1775 (see note 1, below). Its publication was first announced in the Pennsylvania Evening Post of 9 Dec. 1775 and the Pennsylvania Packet of 11 Dec. 1775.

1JJ gave page citations to Journal of the Proceedings of the Congress, held at Philadelphia, May 10, 1775, printed by William and Thomas Bradford, Philadelphia, 1775 (Early Am. Imprints description begins Early American Imprints, series 1: Evans, 1639–1800 [microform; digital collection], edited by American Antiquarian Society, published by Readex, a division of Newsbank, Inc. Accessed: Columbia University, New York, N.Y., 2006–8, http://infoweb.newsbank.com/ description ends , no. 14569). This reference corresponds to the entry of 18 May 1775 in JCC description begins Worthington C. Ford et al., eds., Journals of the Continental Congress, 1774–1789 (34 vols.; Washington, D.C., 1904–37) description ends , 2: 56. Endnotes for later citations will give corresponding entries in the modern JCC description begins Worthington C. Ford et al., eds., Journals of the Continental Congress, 1774–1789 (34 vols.; Washington, D.C., 1904–37) description ends series for the reader’s convenience.

2Entry for 26 May 1775, JCC description begins Worthington C. Ford et al., eds., Journals of the Continental Congress, 1774–1789 (34 vols.; Washington, D.C., 1904–37) description ends , 2: 65–66.

3Entry for 26 May 1775, JCC description begins Worthington C. Ford et al., eds., Journals of the Continental Congress, 1774–1789 (34 vols.; Washington, D.C., 1904–37) description ends , 2: 64.

4Entry for 9 June 1775, JCC description begins Worthington C. Ford et al., eds., Journals of the Continental Congress, 1774–1789 (34 vols.; Washington, D.C., 1904–37) description ends , 2: 84.

5Entry for 12 June 1775. JJ omitted portions of the litany of prayers and other sections of Congress’s call for a general fast. JCC description begins Worthington C. Ford et al., eds., Journals of the Continental Congress, 1774–1789 (34 vols.; Washington, D.C., 1904–37) description ends , 2: 87–88.

6Entry for 6 July 1775, JCC description begins Worthington C. Ford et al., eds., Journals of the Continental Congress, 1774–1789 (34 vols.; Washington, D.C., 1904–37) description ends , 2: 155.

7Entry for 6 July 1775, JCC description begins Worthington C. Ford et al., eds., Journals of the Continental Congress, 1774–1789 (34 vols.; Washington, D.C., 1904–37) description ends , 2: 156–57.

8In this selection from the Olive Branch Petition, JJ omitted several lines without indicating the elisions. JCC description begins Worthington C. Ford et al., eds., Journals of the Continental Congress, 1774–1789 (34 vols.; Washington, D.C., 1904–37) description ends , 2: 160. See also JJ’s draft of the petition, 3–19 June 1775, above.

9Entry for 8 July 1775, JCC description begins Worthington C. Ford et al., eds., Journals of the Continental Congress, 1774–1789 (34 vols.; Washington, D.C., 1904–37) description ends , 2: 166, 167.

10Entry for 8 July 1775, JCC description begins Worthington C. Ford et al., eds., Journals of the Continental Congress, 1774–1789 (34 vols.; Washington, D.C., 1904–37) description ends , 2: 171.

Index Entries