To the Continental Congress Committee
on the Mustering Department
Head Quarters West-point August 20th 1779
I was duly honored with your letter of the 5th of last month,1 which several circumstances have prevented my answering sooner; an attention to other objects of more immediate urgency and the necessity of making inquiries of some delicacy,2 preparatory to a determination.
As the question related to the continuing or abolishing a department which has [been]3 heretofore looked upon as a very necessary one, I thought it of importance enough to take the sense of a Council of General Officers upon it. The Council upon a full consideration of the matter gave it as there opinion that the department was now become unnecessary and the continuance of it inexpedient4—The principles upon which they decided were that part of the duties of the inspectorship were substantially the same with those of the Mustering department; and that the objects of this might be fully obtained in the former with very little additional trouble to the Gentlemen in that line and with a great saving of expence to the public—But after this determination it was requisite to ascertain whether the Inspectors would be willing formally to undertake the office; and it was thought best to sound them with caution as the functions of their present employment are very extensive and it might seem (though in reality it was not) to be imposing too heavy a burthen; and because the Muster Master’s department has hitherto been regarded rather as a civil than a military one—The greatest number has been now consulted and have Chearfully agreed to undertake the business the remoteness of others has prevented their sense being known.
The Baron himself thinks it will be advancive of the service—It is thought as the Officers of the inspectorship are among the best in the line, and as they derive weight from their military rank, they will be better able to answer the purpose of the Institution. I took the liberty to throw out a hint that the union of these departments would no doubt be an additional motive to the public to continue and extend their privileges; but no extension need take place at present.
Upon the present plan all the Inspectors yet appointed are attached to Brigades & divisions; there must be one or two appointed not attached to any particular corps to muster occasionally the detachments remote from the Army in garrison &c. This I apprehend from the present establishment of the Inspectorship I have power to appoint.5
Congress in [abolishing]6 the mustering department will have to transfer the duties to the Inspectorship; but it will be proper to provide that no Colonel shall muster his own regiment. Before I conclude I think it a piece of Justice to observe that Colonel Ward has always appeared to me attentive industrious and intelligent in the execution of his duty; and the Conduct of the Officers under him has given satisfaction. I have the honor to be With great respect Gentlemen Your most Obedt Servt
LS, in Caleb Gibbs’s writing, DNA:PCC, item 152; Df, DLC:GW; copy, DNA: PCC, item 169; Varick transcript, DLC:GW. The members of the committee on the mustering department were Henry Laurens, Joseph Spencer and Nathaniel Scudder.
Henry Laurens, writing for the committee, replied to GW on 3 Sept. from Philadelphia: “We have received Your Excellency’s favor of the 20th Ulto & return our thanks for its contents, which will afford us much assistance in forming a Report to Congress respecting the Mustering department, but the Papers which accompanied our Letter of the 5th July are also necessary to our further proceeding, we therefore request you Sir, to order these to be transmitted to us by an early opportunity” (ALS, DLC:GW; copy, DNA:PCC, item 152; copy, DNA: PCC, item 169).
GW replied to the committee on 13 Sept. from headquarters at West Point: “I have had the Honor to receive Your polite and obliging Letter of the 3d Instant, and inclose by this conveyance, the papers which you request. They ought to have been transmitted before, but it is likely the circumstance of their being Original, was not attended to at the time I wrote, and produced the omission” (LS, in Robert Hanson Harrison’s writing, DNA:PCC, item 152).
On 29 Nov., the committee submitted resolutions to Congress recommending the elimination of the mustering department and suggesting that the inspectors of the army take over its duties “in such manner, and under such regulations as the Commander in Chief shall direct.” Congress approved the resolutions on 12 Jan. 1780 (see JCC, description begins Worthington Chauncey Ford et al., eds. Journals of the Continental Congress, 1774-1789. 34 vols. Washington, D.C., 1904–37. description ends 15:1329–30, 16:47; see also Smith, Letters of Delegates, description begins Paul H. Smith et al., eds. Letters of Delegates to Congress, 1774–1789. 26 vols. Washington, D.C., 1976–2000. description ends 13:402, 448–449).
1. This letter has not been found; however, on 26 July, GW informed a council of general officers that the committee on the mustering department had asked for his recommendation as “to the necessity or expediency of continuing the department” (see Council of General Officers, that date [first council]).
2. GW’s aide-de-camp Alexander Hamilton, who penned the draft, wrote and then crossed out the following text at this point on that document: “into the disposition of the Inspectors.”
3. This word appears on the draft but apparently was omitted inadvertently from the LS.
5. Hamilton originally ended the draft at this point but then crossed out the closing and added the next paragraph.
6. Caleb Gibbs inadvertently wrote “establishing” on the LS, but, on the draft, Hamilton wrote “abolishing.”