To John Hancock
New York Septr 14th 1776.
I have been duly honored with your favor of the 10th with the Resolution of Congress which accompanied It, and thank them for the confidence they repose in my Judgement respecting the evacuation of the City. I could wish to maintain It, Because I know It to be of Importance,1 But I am fully convinced that It cannot be done, and that an attempt for that purpose if persevered in, might & most certainly would, be attended with consequences the most fatal and alarming in their nature. Sensible of this, Several of the Genl Officers since the determination of the Council mentioned in my last, petitioned that a Second Council might be called to reconsider the propositions which had been before them upon the Subject.2 accordingly I called One on the 12th when a large Majority not only determined a removal of the Army prudent but absolutely necessary, declaring they were entirely convinced from a full and minute inquiry into our Situation, that It was extremely perilous and from every movement of the Enemy and the Intelligence received, their plan of Operations was to get in our rear, & by cutting off the Communication with the Main, oblige us to force a passage thro em on the terms they wish, or to become prisoners in some short time for want of necessary supplies of Provision. We are now taking every method in our power to remove the Stores &c. in which we find almost insuperable difficulties. They are so great & so numerous, that I fear we shall not effect the whole before we meet with some interruption. I fully expected that an Attack somewhere would have been made last Night. In that I was disappointed, & happy shall I be If my apprehensions of One to Night or in a day or two, are not confirmed by the Event. If It is deferred a little while longer I flatter myself All will be got away, and our Force be more concentred & of course more likely to resist them with success.
Yesterday afternoon Four Ships of War, Two of Forty & Two of Twenty eight Guns went up the East River, passing between Governors and Long Island, and Anchored about a Mile above the City opposite Mr Stivansents where the Rose Man of War was laying before.3 The design of their going not being certainly known, gives rise to various Conjectures—Some supposing they are to cover the landing of a part of the Enemy above the City—Others that they are to assist in destroying our Battery at Horn’s Hook, that they may have a free and uninterrupted Navigation in the Sound—It is an Object of great importance to them, and what they are industriously trying to effect by a pretty constant Cannonade & Bombardment.
Before I conclude, I would beg leave to mention to Congress, that the pay now allowed to Nurses for their attendance on the sick, is by no means adequate to their services—the consequence of which is, that they are extremely difficult to procure, Indeed they are not to be got, and we are under the necessity of substituting in their place a Number of Men from the respective Regiments, whose service by that means is entirely lost in the proper line of their duty, and but little benefit rendered to the Sick. The Officers I have talked with upon the Subject, All agree that they should be allowed a Dollar Week, and that for less they cannot be had.4 Our Sick are extremely numerous and we find their removal attended with the greatest difficulty; It is a matter that employs much of our time & care, and what makes It more distressing, is the want of proper & convenient places for their reception. I fear their sufferings will be great and many, However nothing on my part that Humanity or policy can require shall be wanting to make them comfortable so far as the State of things will admit of. I have the Honor to be with great respect Sir Your Most Obedt Sert
LS, in Robert Hanson Harrison’s writing, DNA:PCC, item 152; LB, DLC:GW; copy, DNA:PCC, item 169; Varick transcript, DLC:GW. Congress read this letter on 16 Sept. (JCC description begins Worthington Chauncey Ford et al., eds. Journals of the Continental Congress, 1774-1789. 34 vols. Washington, D.C., 1904–37. description ends , 5:760).
1. The LB reads: “Because It is known to be of Importance.”
3. The Rose, which had sailed up the East River on 2 Sept., was anchored near the mouth of Bushwick Creek at this time (see GW to Hancock, 4 Sept.; Mackenzie, Diary description begins Diary of Frederick Mackenzie Giving a Daily Narrative of His Military Service as an Officer of the Regiment of Royal Welch Fusiliers during the Years 1775–1781 in Massachusetts, Rhode Island and New York. 2 vols. Cambridge, Mass., 1930. description ends , 1:38–39; and the logs of the Carysfort, Orpheus, and Roebuck, 13 Sept., in Clark and Morgan, Naval Documents description begins William Bell Clark et al., eds. Naval Documents of the American Revolution. 11 vols. to date. Washington, D.C., 1964—. description ends , 6:805–6, 839). For the sailing of the four warships up the East River to join the Rose, see GW to Heath, 13 Sept., n.4. Petrus Stuyvesant (1727–1805) lived at Petersfield on the East River in one of three country houses in the Bowery area that had been owned by Gov. Petrus Stuyvesant during the previous century.