Washington 20th July 1813.
There being sufficient ground to infer, that it is the purpose of the Enemy to combine with the Blockade of our Ports, special licences to neutral vessels, or to British vessels in neutral disguises, whereby they may draw from our Country the precise kind and quantity of Exports essential to their wants, whilst its general commerce remains obstructed; keeping in view also the insidious discrimination between the different Ports of the United States; and as such a system, if not counteracted will have the effect of diminishing very materially the pressure of the war on the Enemy, and encouraging a perseverance in it, at the same time that it will leave the general Commerce of the United States under all the pressure the Enemy can impose; thus subjecting the whole to Britis⟨h⟩ regulation in subserviency to British monopoly; I recommend to the consideration of Congress, the expediency of an immediate and effectual prohibition of Exports, limited to a convenient day in their next Session, and removable, in the mea⟨n⟩time, in the event of a cessation of the Blockade of our Ports.1
RC (DNA: RG 46, Legislative Proceedings, President’s Messages, 13A-E2); Tr (CStbK). RC in a clerk’s hand, signed by JM. Tr in Elbridge Gerry’s hand. Minor differences between the copies have not been noted.
1. On 23 July the House of Representatives passed a bill entitled “An act laying an embargo on all ships and vessels in the ports and harbors of the United States.” The bill was sent to the Senate the same day and debated there in secret session until 28 July, when Republicans Joseph Anderson, George Bibb, James Brown, Eligius Fromentin, Obadiah German, William Branch Giles, Nicholas Gilman, John Lambert, David Stone, and Joseph Varnum voted with the Federalists to defeat it, eighteen to sixteen (Annals of Congress description begins Debates and Proceedings in the Congress of the United States … (42 vols.; Washington, 1834–56). description ends , 13th Cong., 1st sess., 98–101).