From Harry Toulmin
Fort Stoddert 31st. Octr. 1810.
I have just been honoured with your favour of Septr. 5th. which has been so long on the road in consequence of its going round by way of Natchez.
One of the leading partizans1 takes to himself the merit of having induced the government to make some overtures which he learnt, in the Creek nation, had been made to the Spanish authorities; and has at the same time seen fit to denounce me as a Spanish pensioner, on account of the opposition which I made to the projected enterprize. But few I trust, however, will be disposed to give credit to either, tho’ I am sensible at the same time, that not a device will be left unemployed, to injure me to the utmost.
Our situation here has become very interesting not only on account of the dispositions manifested among ourselves, but on account of the movements among our neighbours: and I have from time to time in letters to Genl. Wilkinson & to Mr Graham, made mention of any thing which I deemed important.
A crisis seems to be fast approaching with the province of West Florida. The utmost panic has seized the people of Mobile on the rumour of a convention army of 1600s men being on its way from Baton-rouge, and certain intelligence, as they thought had brought them to this side of Pearl river. Scouts are kept out by the government, and the people have been packing up their valuables, which some, I am told have actually removed to places of supposed safety. Some of the French below the line have applied to me in much distress to know whether it will be illegal for them to bring their families up, and there are several accordingly who have sought an asylum within the American limits.
Their minds however, I hope will soon be at ease, as they will learn that an armed force coming against them has no existence but in the fears of their rulers.
Col. Ruben Kemper, who has been introduced to me by an old friend in the inclosure No. 1.2 as well as (through a friend here) by an American officer living near the Mississippi, comes as an agent from the Baton-rouge convention, with offers of good will & friendship to the people in this part of the province, where it is evident that there are none at present ingaged to act in concert with the settlements in the west.
There was a Major White3 joined with him in the mission who it is said was held in esteem among the Spaniards, but sickness on the road occasioned his return, and Coll. K. will not deem it prudent to venture below the American boundary. He will have an opportunity, however, of communicating, through the french settlers who reside near the line, the pacific views of the convention, and their desire ultimately to unite themselves to the American government. It is indeed supposed by well informed people that even the Spanish officers at Mobile would give up the country to the U. S. without any resistance.
I have seen the address of the convention to the people of Mobile:4 it is altogether temperate & friendly: but I have no idea that they will be able to form any open party among the people, or to obtain possession of the country by pacific means, unless arrangements can be made to secure in the first instance a good understanding with the Spanish officers. Tho’ many may wish a change; no man will stand forward as an advocate for it. Even the french are generally peacable, domestic men, who have no idea of encouraging civil commotion.
I venture to inclose the extract No. 2. but you will observe from the conclusion, that I dare not give the name:5 nor should I deem it proper to send the extract itself to any person but yourself, as the writer, having considerable property under different governments, might feel himself aggrieved, whatever may be the result of the present crisis.
I am the more pleased with it, as I did expect that British predilections would have rendered him blind to any advantages which might be enjoyed under the American government. Be pleased to accept assurances of the very high and sincere respect, with which I have the honour to be, dear Sir, your faithful & obedt sert.
RC and enclosures (DLC). RC docketed by JM. Enclosure no. 1 (2 pp., docketed by JM) is Jonathan Longstreth to Toulmin, 14 Oct. 1810. Enclosure no. 2 (2 pp.; in Toulmin’s hand) is an “Extract from a letter dated 28th. Octr.”
1. Probably Joseph Pulaski Kennedy.
2. Reuben Kemper had been recently entrusted by the convention at Baton Rouge with the task of organizing an expedition to seize the Spanish post at Mobile. He arrived at Fort Stoddert on 24 Oct. 1810 and was introduced to Toulmin by the commander, Lt. Col. Richard Sparks. The letter he carried from Jonathan Longstreth to Toulmin was a defense of the conduct of the convention at Baton Rouge, first in seizing the Spanish post there and subsequently in declaring West Florida independent of Spanish rule (John H. Johnson to Kemper, 11 Oct. 1810, Padgett, “Official Records of the West Florida Revolution and Republic,” La. Historical Quarterly, 21 : 747–48; Cox, The West Florida Controversy, pp. 457–58).
3. Joseph White had been commissioned by the convention at Baton Rouge to assist Kemper in the enterprise against Mobile (Cox, The West Florida Controversy, p. 421).
4. On 10 Oct. 1810 the convention at Baton Rouge had issued an address to the people of Mobile and Pensacola, announcing the appointment of Kemper and White as its commissioners to request that the people in those Spanish possessions either authorize the convention to act on their behalf or send deputies of their own to Baton Rouge (ibid.).
5. The writer of the extract acquitted the U.S. government of involvement in the disturbances in West Florida and stated his aversion to any change in the status of the province. He doubted, however, that West Florida could sustain its independence, and he preferred therefore to see the region come under the control of the U.S. His letter, the writer stressed to Toulmin, was for “yourself alone. Should the sentiments contained in it be divulged as mine; they would probably subject me to the charge of disaffection or treason with both parties, and you know what I have at stake.” Toulmin’s description of his correspondent as a man of “British predilections” with “considerable property under different governments” suggests that it was either James or John Innerarity, the two leading Scottish-born clerks of the trading firm Panton, Leslie, and Co.