From Thomas Jefferson
Monticello Apr. 19. 09.
I have to acknolege your favor of the 9th. and to thank you for the political information it contained. Reading the newspapers but little & that little but as the romance of the day, a word of truth now & then comes like the drop of water on the tongue of Dives. If the British ministry are changing their policy towards us, it is because their nation, or rather the city of London which is the nation to them, is shaken, as usual, by the late reverses in Spain. I have for some time been persuaded that the government of England was systematically decided to claim a dominion of the sea by conquest, & to levy contributions on all nations, by their licenses to navigate, in order to maintain that dominion to which their own resources are inadequate. The mobs of their cities are unprincipled enough to support this policy in prosperous times, but change with the tide of fortune, & the ministers, to keep their places, change with them. I wish mr. Oakley may not embarras you with his conditions of revoking the orders of council.1 Enough of the non importation law should be reserved 1. to pinch them into a relinquishment of impressments, & 2. to support those manufacturing establishments which their orders, & our interests, forced us to make.
I suppose the conquest of Spain will soon force a delicate question on you as to the Floridas & Cuba which will offer themselves to you. Napoleon will certainly give his consent without difficulty to our recieving the Floridas, & with some difficulty possibly Cuba. And tho’ he will disregard the obligation whenever he thinks he can break it with success, yet it has a great effect on the opinion of our people & the world to have the moral right on our side, of his agreement as well as that of the people of those countries.
Mr. Hackley’s affair is really unfortunate. He has been driven into this arrangement by his distresses which are great. He is a perfectly honest man, as is well known here where he was born;2 but unaccustomed to political subjects he has not seen it in that view. But a respect for the innocence of his views cannot authorize the sanction of government to such an example. If Jarvis continues to wish to go to Rio Janeiro, Lisbon would become vacant, & would suit Hackley. Ought the lying, malicious, & impudent conduct of Meade to force him on the government for Cadiz? I know that the present Secretary of State has not seen his conduct in that light, or he would have removed him as Navy agent: but such has been his conduct in truth; and I have no doubt he will bring forward the transaction between Hackley & Yznardi, in new appeals to the public through the newspapers. Rather than he should obtain what he has so little merited, I would suggest mr. Jefferson as a competitor, altho’ I do not know that he has ever thought of a Consulship, nor would I suggest him, if Yznardi remains in the way. But as to all this do what circumstances will best permit; I shall be satisfied that whatever you do will be right.
I now inclose you the statement which I promised, with Le Maire’s note of the articles within his department.3 If they were not found to be what he has stated, be so good as to make the necessary corrections, & whatever the amount is may be paid, entirely at your own convenience into the bank of the US. in diminution of my note.
Dinsmore & Neilson4 set out yesterday for Montpelier. If mrs. Madison has any thing there which interests her in the gardening way, she cannot confide it better than to Nielson. He is a gardener by nature, & extremely attached to it. Be so good as to assure her of my most friendly respects, and to accept the same for yourself.
[Enclosure No. 1]
|392. bushels of coal @ 25||98.|
|100. bottles of Madeira||100.|
|36. do. Noyau||36.|
|expences filling the ice-house||77.205|
|months months D|
|John Freeman. 76½ out of 132 @ 400.||231.81|
|the deed for John is inclosed.5|
[Enclosure No. 2]
I hereby assign & convey to James Madison President ⟨of the Uni⟩ted States, the withinnamed servant, John, otherwise called John Freeman, during the remaining term of his service from the 11th. day of March last past when he was delivered to the said James [Madison] for the consideration of two hundred and thirty one Dollars 81. cents. Witness m⟨y hand⟩ this 19th. day of April 1809. at Monticello in Virginia.
RC and enclosure no. 1 (DLC); enclosure no. 2 (DLC: Carter G. Woodson Collection); FC and FC of enclosure no. 1 (DLC: Jefferson Papers). Enclosures in Jefferson’s hand.
1. Charles Oakley, newly appointed secretary of the British legation in Washington, carried Canning’s instructions of 23 Jan. 1809 to David Erskine containing the foreign secretary’s conditions for repealing the orders in council (Mayo, Instructions to British Ministers description begins Bernard Mayo, ed., Instructions to the British Ministers to the United States, 1791–1812, Annual Report of the American Historical Association for the Year 1936, vol. 3 (Washington, 1941). description ends , pp. 261–66, 268). Oakley reached Washington on 7 Apr., and Erskine’s negotiations with JM and Secretary of State Smith were concluded on the day Jefferson wrote (Adams, History of the U.S., 5:66, 73).
2. Hackley was related to Jefferson’s son-in-law Thomas Mann Randolph and apparently was a native Virginian (although he had settled in New York by 1804). Jefferson appointed Hackley the U.S. consul at Sanlucar (St. Lucar) late in 1806 after Hackley had asked for a diplomatic post. Hackley probably went abroad on Jefferson’s advice that “some thing might be done for him” if he “was already there” (Senate Exec. Proceedings description begins Journal of the Executive Proceedings of the Senate of the United States of America (3 vols.; Washington, 1828). description ends , 2:45; Edwin Morris Betts and James Adam Bear, Jr., eds., The Family Letters of Thomas Jefferson [Columbia, Mo., 1966], pp. 254 and n. 3, 323, 325–26). Jefferson must have been embarrassed by the turn of events that kept the Cadiz consulate out of Hackley’s reach, for in February 1808 he had written his daughter with a hint that the incumbent consul (Yznardi) in Cadiz might die or soon resign in Hackley’s favor (Betts and Bear, Family Letters of Jefferson, p. 326). However, Yznardi had managed to remain the titular consul at Cadiz by making an agreement which George Erving, the U.S. chargé, approved; and in time he was succeeded by James L. Cathcart, while Hackley was back at his minor post at Sanlucar by 1816 (Yznardi to JM, 30 Dec. 1808 [DNA: RG 59, Diplomatic Despatches, Spain]; ASP description begins American State Papers: Documents, Legislative and Executive, of the Congress of the United States … (38 vols.; Washington, 1832–61). description ends , Miscellaneous, 2:315).
3. Etienne Lemaire was maître d’hôtel during Jefferson’s tenure in the President’s House. Jefferson’s statement (enclosure no. 1) accompanied the RC, but Lemaire’s note has not been found.
4. John Neilson was an Irish-born builder who worked with James Dinsmore on Monticello and Montpelier (Hunt-Jones, Dolley and the “Great Little Madison,” pp. 66–67).
5. See enclosure no. 2. John Freeman was Jefferson’s servant who was brought from Monticello to serve in Washington and remained in JM’s employ.