From Henry Hill Jr., 10 November 1805 (Abstract)
§ From Henry Hill Jr. 10 November 1805, Havana. “I have the honor to acknowledge the recpt. of your circulars of 1st. & 12th. of July, and am happy that the instructions contained in that of the 12th., are such as in future will prevent an abuse which has been largely acted upon in this Island, to the prejudice of our legitimate commerce.
“I have also the honor, to enclose you a statement of the abuses upon our commerce in this Island, with some observations thereon, which I wrote with the intention of publishing in the United states for the information of our merchants;1 but on reflecting that it might militate against the views of the Govt., which it is my duty and wish to promote, and conceiving them, the best judges of the propriety of publishing, & of the expediency of correcting the abuses enumerated, I transmit it to your department to be made use of as may be deemed convenient.
“My returns in January will furnish matter & proofs to authenticate facts, which I hope to have the hono⟨r⟩; of delivering myself, as I propose visiti⟨n⟩;g the United States at that time, and leaveing here a substitute till my return, unless instructions from you should direct me otherwise.
“I hope that this exposition of abuses with other proofs you are already in possession of, will call the attention of our government to the adoption of measures which may speedily alleviate from oppressive impositions a considerabl⟨e⟩; branch of our commerce.
“I am aware of the delicacy of placing any restrictions upon the enterprize of our merchants, but conceive that in this instance it might be made a popular measure, & would be ultimately greatly to their advantage & the country generally. It could not but have the desired effect. I know the sentiments of the people of this Island are such, of the planters particularly who are the prevailing interest, that they would oblige this Govt. to admit our trade on any terms we should please to dictate.
“I view the abuses upon us of an enormous & flagrant nature, and the object of restraining them by legislative aid, not alone as a matter of interest to our merchants, but in a national light, and conceive the honor, character, & interest of the nation concernd, to prevent them. This statement of abuses is accompanied with the orders of the 28th. of may & June therein refered to.
“I also inclose you copy of a sentence passed against Josiah Blakely Esqr. which will serve to shew you the punishment annexed to the act of officiating as Consul of the United states in this Island.2 I appealed for Mr Blakeley from this sentence to the Council of the Indies in Madrid, to prevent its being carried into effect; but this sentence so much alarmed him that he left StYago immediately on receiving intimation of it, and has gone to NewOrleans. He is a persecuted and unfortunate man, I know him well, and has not deserved the malice of his enemies, nor the persecution he has suffered. He left a Mr. Andrew Hadfeg in charge of his office, whom I have confirmed in it, conceiving an agent necessary in that place. Captures by french privateers have not been so frequent of late as hither to. This Government have taken more effectual measures to suppress their piracies—many of them have assumed the Spanish flag. But at Barracoa a scene of iniquitous plunder is still continued by them, which is the only port in the Island where they now carry any prizes. At the West End of the Island there is a number of privateers cruizing, which plunder almost every Vessel they meet with, and send their prizes to campeachy.
“In this quarter there has been three recent captures by Spanish privateers. The schooner Lititia of Phila. Capt Franklin bound from Phila. to New Orleans, sailing under a coasting licence, with a valuable Cargo of dry goods—Brig Argo of Dresden Capt Lilly bound from Jamaica to New York with a Cargo Rum & Brig Mary of newbern N.Carolina, Capt. Barnet, bound from Jamaica to newbern with a cargo of Rum and $12.000 in specie.3
“The former of these Vessels was given up without being libelled with $250 damag⟨es.⟩; The second was cleared in the marine Court of admiralty and damages awarded, the latter is now under adjudication. The present Genl. of Marines seems favorably disposed towards our commerce and if he persecutes the privateersmen as he promises to do, I hope our commerce may be subjected to less interruption than hitherto. It is only Captures by spanish privateers or Ships of War he has cognizance of. Those made by french privateers come under the jurisdiction of the Govr. and Auditor of War; from neither of whom justice can be expected. The former is timid, and fearful of exposing himself to some responsability, therefore will do nothing without the consent of the latter which exhonerates him from any responsability, and the auditor is a venal character who will do nothing without money, and sells his authority and decrees, to the party that will pay the most for them.
“Sea Letters and certificates of property are esteemed indispensable documents here, and every Vessel navigating these seas ought to be furnishd with them.”
Adds in an 11 Nov. postscript: “An Embargo is this day laid on, in consequence of a Schooner sailing with some troops & 50.000 Dollars said to be destined to St. Augustine, which is probable as the troops of that place have not been paid for some time.”
RC, enclosures, and duplicates of enclosures (DNA: RG 59, CD, Havana, vol. 1). RC 8 pp.
1. The enclosure (29 pp.; marked “duplicate”) is a copy of Hill’s 1 Nov. 1805 statement of “Abuses on the commerce of the United States in the Island of Cuba.” Hill listed thirteen examples of Spanish regulations and practices that hindered U.S. trade with Cuba, including a duty of 32½ percent on goods imported in American ships and on the sale of American ships there to non-Spanish buyers, the requirement of a vast number of documents describing the cargoes, the corruption, and the insistence that American merchants and captains hire Spanish translators and brokers. He argued that because the war impeded Spanish trade with the colony, it was dependent on Americans for goods and provisions; he noted that when no ships had arrived for several days, the alarmed authorities lowered the duty by 7 percent, and in January and March of 1805, they had opened ten ports to neutral trade and allowed neutrals to import products that had previously been allowed to enter only in Spanish vessels. He reported that Cuban exports amounted to $12,000,000 annually and since the port of Havana was opened to trade six hundred American ships had arrived; he added that without them to carry away Spanish produce, the plantations and merchants would fail, and he suggested that an interdiction on trade from the United States would demonstrate that. He cited figures to support his argument that American merchants failed to make a profit on goods they sold in the island, except for the slave trade, but the merchants were unable to see that. The local authorities argued that the Americans must be gainers by the trade, since they flocked to the island while knowing well what awaited them. He compared trade conditions at Cuba with those at other West Indian islands, Spanish, British, and French, to Cuba’s detriment. In an added note he further broke down the duties paid in Spain and in Cuba and differentiated between overall cost of duties on goods imported from the United States via Spain and those directly imported. In a postscript dated ca. 11 Nov., he said he had been told the intendant had resolved “to prohibit all British manufactured goods.” In a second undated note following the postscript, he analyzed more minutely the method of calculating the duties using soap as an example and proved that the duty was not the stated 32½ percent but was actually 37 percent. He said “[i]t was a long time before” he could ascertain how the duties were calculated, adding that “not three merchants in this city” could understand it.
2. The enclosure (3 pp.; in Spanish) is a copy of the decree affirming a 15 Sept. 1803 decree banishing Josiah Blakeley from Cuba with the added condition that should he return, he would be imprisoned for five years. He was sentenced for having, with the connivance of others, issued fraudulent papers to cover a shipment of goods in 1799.
3. The schooner Letitia, Captain Franklin, bound from Philadelphia to New Orleans, was captured off Matanzas, Cuba, on 16 Oct. 1805 by the Spanish privateer Vengeance, Capt. Antonio Rouett; the brig Argo, Captain Lilly, was bound from Jamaica to New York with a cargo of rum, when it was captured by the Spanish privateer Flor de Mays, Captain Lissard, and carried into the west end of Cuba (New-York Commercial Advertiser, 6 Nov. 1805; New York Mercantile Advertiser, 15 Nov. 1805).