From James Monroe
Aranjuez March 21st. 1805.
Our last to you was of the first instt. which was sent by original & duplicate by Bordeaux, in which you had copies of our correspondence with Mr. Cevallos to the 28 ulto. Since then we have discussed the question relative to W. Florida, in his last note on which point is a passage relative to France of which I enclose you an extract.1 Having in our note to him of the 26th. ulto. stated that the 3d. art: of the treaty of St. Ildefonso was inserted in our treaty with France as the measure of our right; that it was done because France could not define the boundaries, and that we could admit no other rule than a just construction of that article, we only informed him in reply that we were still of the same opinion, and thought our title unquestionable. We called on him again for his opinion on the last point, the western limits of Louisiana, to which we have not yet recd. an answer.2 After that point is gone thro’, and we receive answers to our letters to Genl. Armstrong sent by Captn. Dulton of wh. copies were sent you,3 we shall soon be able to see whether any thing can be done. We have sent a copy of this extract to genl. armstrong, with such remarks as were applicable to it.4 In asserting our rights with suitable firmness, we have treated the govt. of France with great delicacy & respect, as I trust you will find when the whole subject is before you. I do not go further into the business at present, as this being sent by mail to Mr. Jarvis at Lisbon, is exposed to inspection tho’ under cover from a banker at madrid to one there; but as soon as the business takes a decisive character, be it what it may you shall hear from us and also receive copies of every communication, by a special messenger. Be so good as forward the enclosed without delay to their address. I am sincerely your friend & servt.
Hearing that Mr. Purviance was sick of an obstinate nervous complaint5 I lately enclosed a letter for L’d. Mulgrave to Mr. Erving authorising him in that case to act, wh. I hope will be approved by the President.
RC and enclosures (DNA: RG 59, DD, Spain, vol. 8); Tr and Tr of enclosures (DNA: RG 59, DD, Spain, vol. 7); letterbook copy (NN: Monroe Papers). RC docketed by Wagner as received 21 May. For the enclosures, see nn. 1–2 and 4.
1. The enclosed extract contains the last three paragraphs of Cevallos’s 14 Mar. 1805 note to Pinckney and Monroe (4 pp.; note printed in ASP, Foreign Relations, 2:655–57), denying that any part of West Florida belonged to Louisiana and quoting in support of his statement a 30 Aug. 1804 letter from Talleyrand to Spanish ambassador Federico Gravina, stating that the eastern boundaries of Louisiana were the Mississippi and Iberville rivers and lakes Pontchartrain and Maurepas.
2. The enclosure is a copy of Monroe and Pinckney to Cevallos, 16 Mar. 1805 (1 p.; printed ibid., 657), acknowledging receipt of his 14 Mar. letter and requesting his answer to their note on the western limits of Louisiana.
4. The enclosure is an incomplete copy of Monroe to Armstrong, 17 Mar. 1805 (9 pp.; Tr of complete copy, DNA: RG 59, DD, Spain, vol. 7), enclosing an extract of Cevallos’s 14 Mar. letter (see n. 1 above), repeating Monroe’s arguments in favor of the American view of the Louisiana boundaries, stating that the French could not now claim to know the extent of the boundaries when they had claimed not to in 1803, saying that the U.S. appeal to France about the boundaries was only for information and not to France as arbiter, and adding that Spain was basing all its actions on the expectation of French support, therefore if the Madrid negotiations failed, France would bear the responsibility.