Virginia Delegates in Congress
to Thomas Jefferson
RC (New York State Library, Albany). Except for JM’s signature, this letter is entirely in the hand of Theodorick Bland.
Philadelphia Jany 23d. 1781
It is with much concern that we have learnt from Your Excellencys and the Baron de Steubens letters to Congress,1 the Misfortunes2 our Country has sufferd from the Invasion under the command of the detestable Arnold, and that he has ventured with impunity even to our Capitol.3 we have some reason to Imagine that the same plan of operations which induced Clinton to send him there will occasion him to remain in our Bay and continue that alarm to our state and Maryland which he has so successfully begun in order to Harrass our Militia encrease our expences, waste our resources destroy our Magazines and Stores when he finds it practicable, and by thus distracting us prevent our sending the necessary Succours to the Southern Army. This Sr. is a game we are open to at every period of our short enlistments, and in a great measure exposed to for want of a Militia organized to take the field, a few Gun boats or Galleys, and some good fortifications in the most advantageous Situations on our Rivers for defence, but this late event has renderd this so obvious, that we are fully persuaded our Country will now see the necessity of adopting arrangements very different from what have been of late trusted to. We have been anxiously expecting to hear that some steps were taken at Rhode Island in Consequence of our application to the Minister—but it is more probable you will hear before we do[.] shd. that event take place, which we have spared no pains to have accomplished; and of this we have little doubt shd. it be found practicable;4—Nothing new has happend here since we last wrote.5
The Judge of the Admiralty of this State has given us notice that there are three Negroes Tom Hester & Celia confined in Goal here in consequence of a condemnation of the Vessel in which they were taken. They say they are the property of a certain Money Godwin of Norfolk in Virginia, that their Master went off with the British fleet under Leslie and gave them permission to do the same, on which they went on board the Vessel in which they were taken. If on enquiry your Excellency shall find these facts to be truly stated, we shall with pleasure execute your instructions for securing the slaves for those to whom [they] shall be adjudged.6
We have the honor to be with the utmost respect Yr Excelly’s Most Obt. & humble servants
James Madison Junr.
1. Steuben’s letters of 8 and 11 January were read in Congress on 18 and 22 January, respectively, while Jefferson’s of 10 January was read on the 18th (Journals of the Continental Congress, XIX, 70, 74; Boyd, Papers of Jefferson description begins Julian P. Boyd et al., eds., The Papers of Thomas Jefferson (16 vols. to date; Princeton, N.J., 1950——). description ends , IV, 330, 333–35).
2. After this word, Bland wrote and deleted “and disgrace.”
4. The matter here referred to was the cargo of the ship “Le Comité” (Nightingale to Virginia Delegates, 6 December 1780 and n. 4, 15 February 1781; Virginia Delegates to Nightingale, 2 January 1781 and nn.).
6. If, as seems likely, Francis Hopkinson (1737–1791), judge of the Court of Admiralty of Pennsylvania, notified the Virginia delegates of this matter by letter, it has not been found. Although the Tory Money Godwin remains merely a name, he may have been a member of the family long and prominently identified with Nansemond County and the Norfolk neighborhood. And yet, no trace of a name even remotely resembling Money Godwin has been found in Norfolk municipal or county records. The escaped slaves may have invented the name of a fictitious master as a delaying tactic. General Leslie and his British troops evacuated Portsmouth about 19 November 1780 (Jameson to JM, 18–19 November 1780, n. 10). On 3 February 1781 Jefferson asked Colonel Thomas Newton of Norfolk, a commissioner of the Navy Board of Virginia, to ascertain the facts about Godwin and the three Negroes (Boyd, Papers of Jefferson description begins Julian P. Boyd et al., eds., The Papers of Thomas Jefferson (16 vols. to date; Princeton, N.J., 1950——). description ends , IV, 521). Jefferson apparently did not instruct the delegates, as they here suggested that he might wish to do.