To William Bradford
Jan 24. 1774
My worthy friend,
Yours of the 25 of last month came into my hands a few days past. It gave singular pleasure not only because of the kindness expressed in it but because I had reason to apprehend the letter you recd. last from me had miscarried and I should fail in procuring the intelligence I wanted before the Trip I design in the Spring.1
I congratulate you on your heroic proceedings in Philada. with regard to the Tea. I wish Boston may conduct matters with as much discretion as they seem to do with boldness: They seem to have great Tryals and difficulties by reason of the obduracy and ministerialism of their Governour.2 However Political Contests are necessary sometimes as well as military to afford excercise and practise and to instruct in the Art of defending Liberty and property. I verily believe the frequent Assaults that have been made on America[,] Boston especially [,] will in the end prove of real advantage. If the Church of England had been the established and general Religion in all the Northern Colonies as it has been among us here and uninterrupted tranquility had prevailed throughout the Continent, It is clear to me that slavery and Subjection might and would have been gradually insinuated among us. Union of Religious Sentiments begets a surprizing confidence and Ecclesiastical Establishments tend to great ignorance and Corruption all of which facilitate the Execution of mischievous Projects.3 But away with Politicks! Let me address you as a Student and Philosopher & not as a Patriot now. I am pleased that you are going to converse with the Edwards and Henry’s & Charles &c&c who have swayed the British Sceptre though I believe you will find some of them dirty and unprofitable Companions unless you will glean Instruction from their follies and fall more in love with Liberty by beholding such detestable pictures of Tyranny and Cruelty.4 I was afraid you would not easily have loosened your Affections from the Belles Lettres. A Delicate Taste and warm imagination like yours must find it hard to give up such refined & exquisite enjoyments for the coarse and dry study of the Law: It is like leaving a pleasant flourishing field for a barren desert; perhaps I should not say barren either because the Law does bear fruit but it is sour fruit that must be gathered and pressed and distilled before it can bring pleasure or profit. I perceive I have made a very awkward Comparison but I got the thought by the end and had gone to[o] far to quit it before I perceived that it was too much entangled in my brain to run it through. And so you must forgive it. I myself use to have too great a hankering after those amusing Studies. Poetry wit and Criticism Romances Plays &c captivated me much: but I begin [to] discover that they deserve but a moderate portion of a mortal’s5 Time. and that something more substantial more durable more profitable befits a riper Age. It would be exceeding improper for a labouring man to have nothing but flowers in his Garden or to determine to eat nothing but sweet-meats and Confections. Equally absurd would it be for a Scholar and man of Business to make up his whole Library with Books of Fancy and feed his Mind with nothing but such Luscious performances
When you have an Opportunity and write to Mr. Brackinridge pray tell him I often think of him and long to see him and am resolved to do so in the Spring.6 George Luckey was with me at Christmas and we talked so much about old Affairs & Old Friends that I have a most insatiable desire to see you all. Luckey will accompany me and we are to set off on the 10th. of April if no disa[s]ter befalls either of us.7 I want again to breathe your free Air. I expect it will mend my Constitution & confirm my principles. I have indeed as good an Atmosphere at home as the Climate will allow: but have nothing to brag of as to the State and Liberty of my Country. Poverty and Luxury prevail among all sorts: Pride ignorance and Knavery among the Priesthood and Vice and Wickedness among the Laity. This is bad enough But It is not the worst I have to tell you. That diabolical Hell conceived principle of persecution rages among some and to their eternal Infamy the Clergy can furnish their Quota of Imps for such business. This vexes me the most of any thing whatever. There are at this [time?] in the adjacent County not less than 5 or 6 well meaning men in close Goal for publishing their religious Sentiments which in the main are very orthodox.8 I have neither patience to hear talk or think of any thing relative to this matter, for I have squabbled and scolded abused and ridiculed so long about it, [to so lit]tle purpose that I am without common patience.9 So I [leave you] to pity me and pray for Liberty of Conscience [to revive among us.]10
I expect to hear from you once more before I see you if time will admit: and want to know when the Synod meets & where:11 What the Exchange is at and as much about my friends and other Matters as you can and think worth notice. Till I see you Adieu.
NB Our Correspondence is too far advanced to req[uire a]pologies for bad writing & [b]lots.
January 24. 1774
Your Letter to Mr. Wallace is in my hands and shall be forwarded as soon as possible. I hear nothing from him by Letter or fame.12
2. Governor Thomas Hutchinson (1711–1780), who five months later would be superseded by General Thomas Gage. “Ministerialism” connoted subservience to the Lord North ministry rather than true loyalty to the king.
3. In this paragraph, JM appears to take a middle-of-the-road position toward England’s policies. He counterbalances his wish that the Bostonians would temper their boldness with more discretion by implying that his fellow Virginians should mix some boldness with their oversupply of discretion.
4. What English histories, if any, JM had read is unknown, but he could have come to associate monarchs with tyranny, cruelty, and follies by his study of the Memoirs of Cardinal de Retz (above, Commonplace Book, 1759–1772).
5. JM underlined this word. The period after the next word should have been a comma, and Bradford made the correction in his copybook version.
6. How or where JM expected to see Brackenridge, who was isolated in his school near the southern boundary of Maryland’s eastern shore, is not clear. Brackenridge, however, was still a candidate for an A.M. degree from the College of New Jersey (Claude M. Newlin, Hugh Henry Brackenridge, pp. 25–27). For this reason JM may have hoped to meet him in Philadelphia or Princeton.
7. Luckey, like other candidates for ordination as Presbyterian clergymen in the early 1770’s, was probably on an itinerant preaching mission. JM’s cordial mention of him contrasts sharply with the opinion expressed in his letter of 9 November 1772 to Bradford (q.v.).
8. Near the beginning of this sentence JM either left out a word or words between “this” and “in” or, as Bradford assumed when transcribing the letter into his copybook, meant the “in” to be “and.” Although the unaccustomed fervor displayed by JM in this passage, together with some stronger evidence from other sources (Lewis Peyton Little, Imprisoned Preachers and Religious Liberty in Virginia [Lynchburg, 1938], pp. 127–40, 516–21), suggests that he was witnessing “persecution” close by Montpelier, the editors think he more likely had only “the adjacent county” of Culpeper in mind. There, in 1773–1774, flagrant intolerance led to the imprisonment of a half-dozen Baptist preachers (Robert B. Semple, A History of the Rise and Progress of the Baptists in Virginia , revised and extended by Reverend G. W. Beale [Richmond, 1894], pp. 382, 481–84).
9. Judging from this statement, JM was already conspicuous in his own locality as a defender of religious dissenters. In a brief autobiography which he sent to James K. Paulding in 1832, he declared that he was “under very early and strong impressions in favor of liberty both Civil and Religious. His devotion to the latter found a particular occasion for its exercise in the persecution instituted in his County as elsewhere, against the preachers belonging to the sect of Baptists… . Notwithstanding the enthusiasm which contributed to render them obnoxious to sober public opinion, as well as the laws then in force, against Preachers dissenting from the Established Religion, he spared no exertion to save them from imprisonment, and to promote their release from it. This interposition, tho’ a mere duty prescribed by his conscience, obtained for him a lasting place in the favor of that particular sect.” Fortunately, he concluded, American independence brought with it religious freedom (LC: William C. Rives Papers). Apparently it was religious issues, more than tax and trade regulation disputes with England, which were rapidly luring JM away from his beloved studies and arousing his interest in contemporary politics.
10. The bracketed words in this and the preceding sentence, illegible in the original letter, were taken from Bradford’s copybook version. William C. Rives, one of the anonymous editors of the Congressional edition of JM’s papers, made the sentence say: “So I must beg you to pity me, and pray for liberty of conscience to all” (Madison, Letters description begins (Cong. ed.). [William C. Rives and Philip R. Fendall, eds.], Letters and Other Writings of James Madison (published by order of Congress; 4 vols.; Philadelphia, 1865). description ends [Cong. ed.], I, 12). Rives sometimes made improper alterations in JM’s phraseology, but it is possible that here the handwriting may have been less faded when he read it than it is now. In any event, JM clearly wrote “Liberty of Conscience” instead of the expression “religious Toleration” used by him in his letter to Bradford on 1 December 1773. If JM in each instance took special care to state exactly what he meant, he had moved to a significantly more liberal position during the month intervening between these two letters.
11. The Synod of New York and Philadelphia of the Presbyterian Church convened in Philadelphia on 18 May 1774.
12. “Fame” in the eighteenth century frequently signified “public report or rumor” rather than “eminence.” If Bradford’s letter to Caleb Wallace is the same one mentioned by JM in his letter of 25 September 1773, Wallace’s whereabouts in North Carolina or Georgia must have been unknown to JM (JM to Bradford, 25 September 1773, n. 6).