From Robert R. Livingston
I find with great regret that a report which circulates here of your intention to resign your office gains credit. It appears to me that there are many motives as well of a public as of a private nature which should induce you to take this resolution with great deliberation. Your present station holds you up to the view of your country in the most conspicuous point of light. The attacks which your enemies in administration have made upon you have excited the public attention and served to convince those who were not acquaintd with your character of your1 attatchment to the Liberties of your country in a station in which it might have been expected that you would have some byass to a contrary sentiment. Not to have been [redirected?] by2 the spirit of the corps has done no little honor to your virtue and to your firmness. Will not the latter lose somewhat of its luster if by resigning at this period you suffer yourself in appearance to be drumed out of the regiment and that too when there is every reasonable ground to hope that upon the first vacancy you will be promoted to the command of the troops? The interest that the public will derive from your continuing in your present station independant of your talents experience and knowledge of business are too obvious to have escaped your observation. In a fluctuating government where the members of the legislature are constantly changing and only part of the year in session what better check is there on the3 encroachments of administration4 than one of their own body who shall refuse to concur in improper measures?5 A post in an enemies country serves at once to compell them to act with caution and as point of raliament for6 the broken troops of the garrison. I submit these hasty thoughts to your consideration and shall rejoice if you afford me an opportunity of contradicting the report which is so little relished by your friends and those of the country.
Having hitherto spoken to you as a statesman let me ask you a question as a philosopher which I have put in vain to those of this place (tho this indeed is no wonder since you will find by the list of members of your philosophical society at Philadelphia that it is impossible to find a philosopher at New York). Some time before it snows the air is extremely cold but immediately before the snow falls the thermometer rises many degrees it after falls again during the snow storm and almost always after it is over. If as is now the received opinion the air acts as a menstruum to disolve water it would hold more in solution while it was warm than when cold and the reverse of what I have observed should take place it should be colder when the snow was about to fall than at any other time—to what cause is this to be attributed? My own Idea is that7 water disolved in air is incapable of freezing as indeed is evident from water being held in solution in air8 When the thermometer is many degrees below the freezing point. But as warm air will disolve much more water than cold when the air becomes cold and its volume is diminished it brings the particles of water nearer they naturally attract each other quit the menstruum in which they were disolved [shoot?] into crystals and assume those regular forms in which snow is always found. In their passage from water to snow they give out a quantity of heat which occasiones the rise of the thermometer that is always observable just before the snow falls. This accounts for the two phenomena that distinguish snow from hail its regular formation and the fall of the thermometer—its rise after the snow has fallen is natural since the cause that rendered it warm has ceased to operate and the renewed capacity of
Dft (NHi: Robert R. Livingston Papers); undated, unaddressed, and unfinished; two words illegible.
The absence in SJL of any record of a letter from Livingston in 1792–93 or of a reply by TJ indicates that this unfinished draft was never sent. Internal evidence suggests that Livingston, the chancellor of New York and a prominent Republican leader, probably wrote it late in February or early in March 1793—before news arrived in America early in April of the French declaration of war against England and Holland and the onset of the neutrality crisis—and then abandoned it when he received word of TJ’s decision to continue as Secretary of State after President Washington’s first term ended. Livingston’s plea that TJ not retire in the face of attacks by his enemies in administration, a reference to the barrage of newspaper criticisms unleashed by Alexander Hamilton in the summer and fall of 1792, echoes one of the main arguments used publicly and privately by Republicans in Philadelphia early in 1793 to dissuade the Secretary of State from returning to private life. The first authoritative public announcement of TJ’s decision to remain in office appeared in the 6 Mch. 1793 issue of the Philadelphia General Advertiser (Malone, Jefferson description begins Dumas Malone, Jefferson and his Time, Boston, 1948–81, 6 vols. description ends , iii, 8–10). It seems likely that this report came to Livingston’s notice or that he unofficially learned even earlier of the Secretary of State’s decision—first mentioned to one of his daughters late in January and to the President early in February 1793—and decided that his letter to TJ was no longer necessary (see TJ to Martha Jefferson Randolph, 26 Jan. 1793; Notes of a Conversation with George Washington, 7 Feb. 1793).
1. Thus in manuscript. Livingston here canceled “unchanged.”
2. Preceding three words interlined in place of “felt.”
3. Before deciding on the preceding seven words, Livingston wrote what appears to be “how essential it is to prevent.”
4. Word interlined in place of “executive,” which had been substituted for “the government.”
5. Livingston here canceled “Who shall be always upon duty and who […].”
6. Before settling on the preceding sixteen words, Livingston first wrote “will compel them to be always upon their guard and serve as point to which to raly.”
7. Livingston here canceled “when the air in the [upper?] is charged with vapours.”
8. Preceding two words interlined.