The American Peace Commissioners to Robert R. Livingston
Paris, Decr. 14. 1782.1
We have the honour to congratulate Congress on the Signature of the Preliminaries of a Peace between the Crown of Great Britain & the United States of America, to be inserted in a definitive Treaty so soon as the Terms between the Crowns of France & Great Britain shall be agreed on. A Copy of the Articles is here inclosed,2 and we cannot but flatter ourselves; that they will appear to Congress as they do to all of us, to be consistent with the honour and Interest of the United States, and we are persuaded Congress would be more fully of that Opinion if they were apprized of all the Circumstances and Reasons which have influenc’d the Negotiation. Although it is impossible for us to go into that Detail, we think it necessary nevertheless to make a few Remarks on such of the Articles, as appear most to require Elucidation.
Remarks on Article 2d: relative to Boundaries.
The Court of Great Britain, insisted on retaining all the Territories comprehended within the Province of Quebec, by the Act of Parliament respecting it. They contended that Nova Scotia should extend to the River Kennebeck; and they claimed not only all the Lands in the Western Country, and on the Missisippi, which were not expressly included in our Charters and Governments, but also all such Lands within them as remained ungranted by the King of Great Britain: It would be endless to enumerate all the Discussions and Arguments, on the Subject. We knew this Court and Spain to be against our Claims to the Western Country, and having no Reason to think that Lines more favourable could ever have been obtained, we finally agreed to those described in this Article: indeed they appear to leave us little to complain of, and not much to desire. Congress will observe that although our Northern Line, is in a certain Part below the Latitude of Forty five, yet in others it extends above it, divides the Lake Superior, and gives us Access to its Western & Southern Waters, from which a Line in that Latitude would have excluded us.
Remarks on the Article 4th: respecting Creditors.
We had been informed that some of the States, had confiscated British Debts, but although each State has a Right to bind its own Citizens, yet in our Opinion, it appertains solely to Congress, in whom exclusively are vested the Rights of making War and Peace, to pass Acts against the Subjects of a Power with which the Confederacy may be at War. It therefore only remained for us to consider, whether this article is founded in Justice & good Policy.
In our Opinion no Acts of Government could dissolve the Obligations of Good Faith, resulting from lawfull Contracts between Individuals of the two Countries, prior to the War. We knew that some of the British Creditors were making common Cause with the Refugees, and other Adversaries of our Independence,3 besides, sacrificing private Justice to Reasons of State and political Convenience, is always an odious Measure, and the Purity of our Reputation in this Respect in all foreign Commercial Countries, is of infinitely more Importance to us, than all the Sums in question. It may also be remarked, that American and British Creditors, are placed on an equal footing.
Remarks on Articles 5 & 6: respecting Refugees.
These Articles were among the first discussed, and the last agreed to. And had not the Conclusion of this Business, at the Time of its Date, been particularly important to the British Administration, the Respect, which both in London and Versailles, is supposed to be due to the honour, Dignity and Interests of Royalty, would probably have for ever prevented our bringing this Article so near to the Views of Congress and the sovereign Rights of the States, as it now stands. When it is consider’d, that it was utterly impossible to render this Article perfectly consistent, both with American and British Ideas of Honour, we presume that the middle Line adopted by this Article, is as little unfavourable to the former, as any that could in Reason be expected.
As to the Separate Article,4 We beg leave to observe, that it was our Policy to render the Navigation of the River Missisippi so important to Britain, as that their Views might correspond with ours on that Subject. Their possessing the Country on the River, North of the Line from the Lake of the Woods, affords a Foundation for their claiming such Navigation: and as the Importance of West Florida to Britain was for the same Reason rather to be strengthen’d than otherwise, we thought it adviseable to allow them the Extent contained in the Separate Article, especially as before the War it had been annex’d by Britain to W. Florida, and would operate as an [a]dditional Inducement to their joining with us in agreeing, that the Navigation of the River should forever remain open to both.— The Map used in the Course of our Negotiations was Mitchells.
As we had reason to imagine that the Articles respecting the Boundaries, the Refugees & Fisheries, did not correspond with the Policy of this Court, we did not Communicate the Preliminaries to the Minister, until after they were signed; and not even then the Separate Article. We hope that these Considerations will excuse our having so far deviated from the Spirit of our Instructions. The Count de Vergennes, on perusing the Articles appear’d surprized, but not displeased, at their being so favourable to us.5
We beg leave to add our Advice that Copies be sent us of the Accounts directed to be taken by the different States, of the unnecessary Devastations and Sufferings sustained by them from the Enemy in the Course of the War.— should they Arrive before the Signature of the definitive Treaty they might possibly answer very good purposes.—6
With great Respect, We have the honour to be, / Sir, / Your most obedient, & / most humble Servants.
Enter’d on the Minutes.
W. T. Franklin Secy:
RC and enclosure (PCC, No. 85, f. 254–270); internal address: “The Honble: Robert R. Livingston Esqr. / Secretary for Foreign Affairs.” Dft (Adams Papers). LbC-Tr (Adams Papers); APM Reel 103.
1. On 12 Dec. the commissioners met at Henry Laurens’ residence to sign their letter of that date to Francis Dana, above, and decided that JA and John Jay would draft their joint letter to Robert R. Livingston. That evening the two men drew up the letter and on the following day JA circulated the draft, dated 13 Dec., to his colleagues for their “Corrections and Additions.” The final letter, together with the enclosed preliminary treaty and other dispatches from the commissioners as individuals, was sent on board the packet General Washington, Capt. Joshua Barney, which left Lorient on 17 Jan. 1783 and reached Philadelphia on 12 March (JA, D&A description begins Diary and Autobiography of John Adams, ed. L. H. Butterfield and others, Cambridge, 1961; 4 vols. description ends , 3:42, 54, 58, 95–96; Pennsylvania Gazette, 19 March 1783; from Barney, 18 Dec., below). Livingston replied on 25 March, below. In his 12 April letter to James Warren, below, JA noted the delay in Barney’s departure and judged it “partly accidental and partly designed.”
2. Congress’ dispatch book indicates that this letter arrived with four enclosures, but only the copy of the preliminary treaty is with the letter in the PCC. According to the dispatch book, the three missing enclosures were copies of the preliminary treaty proposed by the American and British commissioners, respectively, and an unidentified article offered by the Americans (PCC, No. 185, III, f. 56).
3. At this point in the draft is the canceled passage: “it was our Policy to render that opposition as insignificant as possible, and it was easy to foresee that by Satisfying these Creditors, they would be among the first to clamour for Peace and the Return of Commerce.”
4. The draft contains neither this paragraph concerning the separate article nor the reference to the article in the next paragraph.
5. This paragraph is in John Jay’s hand in the draft.
6. In the draft, this paragraph reads: “We beg Leave to add our Advice, that Congress should take Measures to obtain, as soon as possible an Account of the Losses Sustained and Cruelties suffered by the Citizens of the respective States of America, by Plunder Burnings, Robberies and Exportations of Negroes, Plate and other Property, by the British Forces, and transmit them to Us, and preserve them for their own Use, as soon as possible— Should Such an Account arrive before the Signature of the definitive Treaty, it may Serve as a Ground Work for demanding Satisfaction.”
Immediately above that paragraph is an alternative passage in Henry Lauren’s hand, perhaps intended for insertion after the words “We beg Leave”: “to urge Congress to obtain the most ample Account of Losses sustained by the Citizens & respective States of America by Plunder, Robbery, burnings—exportation of Negroes &c &c by the British Troops & to a transmission as early as possible.”